13004.1 VC –Counterfeit Identification Cards
Table of contents
Click To travel To Chapters
1. What is Counterfeit Identification Cards?
2. What are examples of 13004.1 VC –Counterfeit Identification Cards ?
California Vehicle Code Section 13004.1 (VC) makes it a crime to manufacture, sell, or possess counterfeit identification cards. Counterfeit identification cards are fraudulent documents made to resemble official IDs, such as driver’s licenses or state-issued identification cards, with the intent to deceive others.
Here are some common examples that fall under the violation of 13004.1 VC:
1. Creating Fake Identification Cards for Sale
One of the most common examples of violating VC 13004.1 is when an individual manufactures fake IDs with the intent to sell them. This includes:
Fake Driver’s Licenses: Someone may create a fraudulent driver’s license that looks similar to a real one issued by the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) but contains altered details, such as a fake name, date of birth, or address.
Fake State ID Cards: Individuals may forge or produce counterfeit state-issued ID cards designed to look like legitimate identification cards. These cards are often used by minors who wish to bypass age restrictions for purchasing alcohol, cigarettes, or entering clubs.
Fake Identification for Employment: Another example includes manufacturing counterfeit IDs to help someone get a job by providing fraudulent identification to an employer who requires proof of identity.
2. Possessing or Using Fake Identification Cards
Simply possessing or using a counterfeit identification card can also fall under the violation of VC 13004.1, even if the person did not manufacture it. Examples include:
Using a Fake ID to Buy Alcohol or Cigarettes: A minor using a fake ID to purchase alcohol or cigarettes is engaging in an illegal act under VC 13004.1. This can also lead to charges for unlawful use of identification cards under VC 13004.
Using Fake ID to Enter Restricted Areas: Minors or others may use counterfeit identification to gain access to age-restricted venues, such as bars, nightclubs, or casinos, where entry is limited to individuals above a certain age.
Using a Fake ID for Travel: Some individuals may use counterfeit IDs to attempt to board a flight, rent a car, or engage in other activities that require age verification or identity confirmation.
3. Selling Fake IDs Online
With the rise of e-commerce and online markets, selling counterfeit IDs over the internet has become a growing issue. Examples of illegal online activity under VC 13004.1 include:
Online Marketplace Transactions: A person may create a fake identification card and sell it via websites, social media platforms, or other online channels. This can include selling IDs to minors who want to purchase alcohol, gain access to clubs, or deceive others.
Dark Web Sales: Some people go a step further and engage in the sale of counterfeit IDs through the dark web, where individuals use encrypted services to buy and sell illegal products and services, including fake identification.
4. Creating Fake IDs for Personal Use
Another example of violating VC 13004.1 involves creating fake IDs for personal use, even if they are not intended for resale. Some individuals may manufacture counterfeit IDs for various purposes, such as:
Using Fake ID to Avoid Age Restrictions: A person may create a fake ID to mislead authorities or individuals about their age in order to access restricted activities, such as gambling or buying age-restricted products.
Creating Fake Identification for Travel or Convenience: In some cases, individuals create counterfeit IDs to ease travel restrictions, such as boarding a flight, or to gain access to venues that require proof of identity.
5. Forgery of Official Documents with Fake IDs
Sometimes individuals may combine the use of fake IDs with other forms of document forgery. For example:
Fake IDs Used for Forged Signatures: A person may use a counterfeit ID as part of a broader fraudulent scheme, such as forging documents, contracts, or financial paperwork by presenting the fake ID as valid identification to trick others.
Counterfeit IDs for Legal Transactions: Some individuals may attempt to forge official documents, such as contracts, leases, or bank transactions, by using a counterfeit ID to pass off as someone else.
3. What are the penalties for 13004.1 VC –Counterfeit Identification Cards ?
California Vehicle Code Section 13004.1 (VC) makes it illegal to manufacture, sell, or possess counterfeit identification cards, such as fake driver’s licenses or state-issued ID cards. This crime is taken seriously, and violators may face significant penalties if convicted. The penalties for a violation of 13004.1 VC depend on the circumstances of the crime, the defendant’s criminal history, and whether the offense is charged as a misdemeanor or felony.
Misdemeanor Penalties for 13004.1 VC
In most cases, the offense of manufacturing, selling, or possessing counterfeit identification cards is classified as a misdemeanor under California law. If charged as a misdemeanor, the penalties can include:
Fines: A person convicted of violating VC 13004.1 can be ordered to pay a fine. The fine can range from $250 to $1,000 depending on the circumstances of the case and the discretion of the judge.
Community Service: In addition to or instead of a fine, the defendant may be required to complete 24 hours of community service. This could involve tasks that benefit the community, such as working at nonprofit organizations or helping with local government projects.
Imprisonment: In some cases, the court may impose jail time for a misdemeanor conviction. The defendant could face up to one year in county jail. However, the court may also opt for probation instead of jail time, particularly if it is the defendant’s first offense or if there are mitigating circumstances.
Felony Penalties for 13004.1 VC
While most cases under VC 13004.1 are charged as misdemeanors, there are certain circumstances where the offense could be elevated to a felony. This typically occurs when there are aggravating factors, such as the defendant’s criminal history or the scale of the operation (e.g., manufacturing large quantities of counterfeit IDs).
If the offense is charged as a felony, the penalties become much more severe:
Imprisonment: A felony conviction can result in imprisonment in county jail for up to one year. However, in more serious cases, the defendant may face a prison sentence for two to three years.
Fines: A felony conviction under VC 13004.1 can result in a maximum fine of $10,000. This is a significant increase compared to the fines associated with misdemeanor convictions.
Felony Probation: In lieu of prison time, the court may impose felony probation. This is a type of supervision where the defendant must comply with certain conditions, such as attending counseling, paying restitution, or submitting to regular check-ins with a probation officer.
Factors That Can Affect the Penalty
Several factors can influence the severity of the penalty for a violation of VC 13004.1. These factors include:
Criminal History: If the defendant has prior convictions, especially for similar offenses or other crimes involving deception, the penalties may be more severe. California law allows for harsher sentences for repeat offenders, and the court may impose additional penalties to discourage future criminal behavior.
Scale of the Offense: The penalties can vary based on the scale of the counterfeit ID operation. For example, if the defendant was involved in a large-scale operation manufacturing and selling counterfeit IDs to minors or for fraudulent activities, this could result in felony charges with more severe penalties.
Intent: If the defendant acted with malicious intent or had the specific purpose of committing fraud, the penalties may be increased. Conversely, if the defendant can prove that they did not have fraudulent intent, such as in cases where the ID was created for a harmless purpose (e.g., as a gag gift), the court may be more lenient.
Cooperation with Authorities: If the defendant cooperates with law enforcement or provides valuable information about others involved in the counterfeit ID operation, this could lead to reduced penalties or a more favorable sentence.
Alternative Sentences
In some cases, the court may opt for alternative sentencing options instead of jail time. These could include:
Probation: The court may grant summary probation or informal probation, which means the defendant will not serve jail time but will be under supervision and must comply with specific conditions set by the court. This could include community service, attending counseling or education programs, or paying restitution.
Restitution: If any victims suffered financial harm as a result of the counterfeit ID, the court may order the defendant to pay restitution to compensate for any losses incurred.
Related Offenses and Penalties
It’s important to note that other related offenses may come into play when someone is caught with counterfeit IDs. These can include:
Unlawful Use of Identification Cards (VC 13004): If someone uses or possesses a fake identification card with the intent to deceive, they may be charged under VC 13004, which carries penalties such as fines, jail time, or both.
Forgery (PC 470): Forging or counterfeiting a driver’s license or identification card can lead to additional charges under Penal Code 470, which can carry both misdemeanor and felony penalties, depending on the circumstances.
Possession of Fake IDs (PC 470(b)): If someone is caught with a fake ID with the intent to use it to commit fraud, they can be charged under PC 470(b), which is also a wobbler offense and can result in significant fines and imprisonment.
4. What are legal defenses for 13004.1 VC –Counterfeit Identification Cards ?
California Vehicle Code Section 13004.1 (VC) criminalizes the manufacture, sale, or possession of counterfeit identification cards. This law is designed to protect against fraud and identity theft by making it illegal to create or distribute fake identification documents, such as driver’s licenses or state-issued ID cards. However, there are several legal defenses that can be raised to challenge a charge under VC 13004.1.
If you have been accused of violating this statute, it is important to understand the possible defenses that could help reduce or dismiss the charges against you. Below are common legal defenses used in cases involving counterfeit IDs:
1. Lack of Intent to Defraud
One of the most common defenses to charges under VC 13004.1 is that the defendant did not have the intent to defraud or deceive others. California law specifies that to violate this statute, the person must act with fraudulent intent—meaning they intend to deceive someone for personal gain, such as using a fake ID to buy alcohol or enter a restricted area.
If the defendant did not intend to deceive or commit fraud, this could be a strong defense. For example, if someone created a fake ID for a harmless purpose (such as a novelty gift or a prop for a movie), they might argue that they did not intend to commit fraud and were not attempting to deceive anyone.
Example:
A defendant could argue that they made a fake ID as a joke for a friend’s birthday party, and there was no intent to use it for any illegal or fraudulent purposes.
2. No Knowledge of the Counterfeit Nature of the ID
In some cases, a defendant may claim that they were unaware that the identification card was counterfeit. This defense can be used if the individual did not know that the ID they were in possession of was fake, or if they were misled into believing the ID was legitimate.
If the defendant did not know they were dealing with a fraudulent or counterfeit ID, they could argue that they had no intent to break the law. This defense may apply if the defendant unknowingly purchased a fake ID or was unaware that someone else had altered their ID.
Example:
If someone buys what they believe to be a legitimate identification card from a vendor but later finds out it is counterfeit, they could argue that they did not know the ID was fake and were not intending to use it for fraudulent purposes.
3. Entrapment
Entrapment is a defense that applies when law enforcement officers coerce or pressure a person into committing a crime that they otherwise would not have committed. In counterfeit ID cases, if a defendant can prove that law enforcement officers induced them to manufacture or sell counterfeit IDs (for example, through undercover sting operations), they may argue that they were entrapped into committing the crime.
Entrapment is a complex defense, and it typically requires evidence that law enforcement went beyond simply providing an opportunity for a crime to occur—they must have actively encouraged or persuaded the defendant to commit the offense.
Example:
If an undercover officer offered a defendant a large sum of money to create and sell a fake ID, and the defendant only agreed due to persistent pressure from the officer, the defendant might argue that they were entrapped.
4. Lack of Evidence or Unlawful Search and Seizure
A lack of evidence is a key defense in many criminal cases, including those involving counterfeit identification cards. If the prosecution cannot prove that the defendant was manufacturing, selling, or possessing counterfeit IDs, the charges may be dismissed.
Additionally, the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects individuals against unlawful search and seizure by law enforcement. If evidence of counterfeit IDs was obtained through an illegal search—such as a search without a valid warrant or probable cause—then that evidence may be excluded from the case.
If the defense can prove that law enforcement violated the defendant’s constitutional rights when gathering evidence, the court may dismiss the charges or suppress the evidence.
Example:
If the police conducted a search of the defendant’s property without a warrant or without probable cause, and this search uncovered counterfeit IDs, the defense could argue that the evidence should be excluded because it was obtained unlawfully.
5. Duress
Duress is a legal defense in which the defendant argues that they committed the crime because they were forced to do so under the threat of immediate harm or death. This defense is generally only applicable in situations where the defendant had no reasonable opportunity to escape or resist the coercion.
In a case involving counterfeit identification cards, a defendant might argue that they were forced to manufacture or sell fake IDs because of a threat made against their safety. However, duress is a narrow defense and is not likely to be successful unless the threat was serious and imminent.
Example:
A defendant might claim that they were forced to create counterfeit IDs for a dangerous person who threatened to harm them or their family if they refused.
6. Mistaken Identity
Another possible defense is mistaken identity, where the defendant argues that they were wrongly identified as the person responsible for the counterfeit IDs. This defense can be used if the defendant believes that the charges were brought against them based on incorrect information, or if there is confusion regarding who was responsible for the offense.
Example:
If someone else was involved in the creation or sale of counterfeit IDs and the defendant was mistakenly identified as the perpetrator, they could argue that they were not involved in the crime and that the evidence is incorrect.
our clients say it best
Client Testimonials
5. What are related offenses to 13004.1 VC –Counterfeit Identification Cards ?
Protecting Your Rights, Defending Your Future
Get in touch with our lawyers today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help you. We are here to answer your questions and provide you with the support you need during this difficult time.
Client Satisfaction Is Priority
You Are More Than What They Say
We Always Go The Extra Mile