CDCR Form 115 Discipline
Table of contents
Click To travel To Chapters
1. What is CDCR Form 115 Discipline?
2. What are Examples of CDCR Form 115 Discipline?
In California’s prison system, the CDCR Form 115 Discipline Report is used to document rule violations by inmates. These violations range from minor administrative infractions to serious offenses that may result in significant penalties or even criminal charges. Understanding real-life examples of these rule violations can help inmates and their families better navigate the disciplinary process. Below, we outline specific examples of CDCR Form 115 discipline for both administrative violations and serious violations.
1. Examples of Administrative Violations
Administrative violations are minor infractions of prison rules that do not involve violence, criminal activity, or significant security concerns. These are documented using the standard Form 115.
Example 1: Failure to Follow Scheduled Programs
An inmate assigned to a work program fails to report to their assigned duty without providing a valid reason. For instance, the inmate skips their scheduled cleaning shift in the facility, which disrupts the daily operations of the prison.
Example 2: Inappropriate Conduct in Common Areas
An inmate repeatedly talks loudly or uses offensive language in the library or dining hall, ignoring staff warnings to comply with the rules of conduct.
Example 3: Possession of Unauthorized Items
An inmate is found with non-dangerous contraband, such as extra food from the dining hall or unapproved clothing items that do not pose a threat to security.
Example 4: Failure to Comply with Bedtime Rules
An inmate refuses to return to their designated housing unit at the required time, delaying evening count procedures.
Administrative violations typically result in minor disciplinary actions, such as:
Verbal warnings.
Loss of privileges, such as recreation time or access to the canteen.
Confinement to quarters for up to 10 days.
2. Examples of Serious Violations
Serious violations involve more significant breaches of prison rules and are documented using Form 115A. These infractions often include violent behavior, possession of dangerous contraband, or actions that disrupt prison security.
Example 1: Use of Violence or Threats
An inmate is involved in a physical altercation with another inmate, using force or threats of violence. For instance, one inmate punches another during an argument over seating arrangements in the dining hall.
Example 2: Possession of Dangerous Contraband
An inmate is caught with a weapon, such as a sharpened piece of metal or a homemade knife, during a routine cell inspection.
Example 3: Drug or Alcohol Use
An inmate fails a drug test and is found to have consumed illegal substances while in custody. Alternatively, an inmate is discovered intoxicated after brewing homemade alcohol (“pruno”) in their cell.
Example 4: Attempting to Escape
An inmate is found tampering with locks or planning an escape, such as creating a hole in the facility wall or conspiring with others to overpower guards.
Example 5: Disruption of Prison Operations
An inmate participates in an organized protest or hunger strike that disrupts normal prison activities, such as blocking staff access to key areas or refusing to comply with roll call.
Example 6: Unauthorized Possession of a Cell Phone
An inmate is caught using a contraband cell phone to communicate with individuals outside of the facility, violating prison security protocols.
3. The Disciplinary Process for Form 115 Violations
Once a violation is reported, the following process typically occurs:
Written Report: The inmate receives a copy of the Form 115 or Form 115A with detailed information about the alleged violation.
Hearing: A hearing is scheduled to determine whether the violation occurred. Inmates accused of serious violations have additional rights, such as the ability to call witnesses or request investigative assistance.
Outcome: If the violation is proven, disciplinary sanctions are imposed, which can include:
Loss of good conduct credits (up to 360 days for serious offenses).
Suspension of visitation, phone, or mail privileges.
Confinement to quarters or privilege group changes.
4. Impact of CDCR Form 115 Violations on Inmates
Violations documented using Form 115 can have serious consequences, particularly for serious infractions. These can include:
Extended Incarceration: Loss of good conduct credits delays the inmate’s release date.
Program Disqualification: Inmates may lose access to certain work, education, or rehabilitation programs.
Parole Impact: Serious violations may harm an inmate’s chances of being granted parole.
5. Avoiding CDCR Form 115 Discipline
Inmates can avoid disciplinary actions by:
Understanding and following prison rules and regulations.
Seeking clarification from staff if unsure about policies.
Reporting conflicts or safety concerns before they escalate.
3. What are the Penalties for CDCR Form 115 Discipline?
In the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) system, a Form 115 Discipline Report is issued when an inmate violates prison rules. The penalties for these violations vary depending on whether the offense is classified as an administrative violation or a serious violation. These penalties can have significant consequences on an inmate’s privileges, rehabilitation opportunities, and even their release date. Below is a comprehensive breakdown of the potential penalties associated with CDCR Form 115 discipline.
Loss of Good Conduct Credits
One of the most impactful penalties for serious rule violations is the forfeiture of good conduct credits, which are earned by inmates for adhering to rules and participating in rehabilitative programs.
Administrative Violations: Inmates may lose a small portion of their good conduct credits.
Serious Violations: Inmates can lose up to 360 days of good conduct credits for the most severe violations, such as:
Acts of violence (e.g., murder, manslaughter, or assault).
Possession of dangerous contraband.
Escaping or attempting to escape.
The loss of these credits directly impacts an inmate’s release date, extending their incarceration.
Privilege Restrictions
Violations documented with Form 115 can lead to restrictions on privileges that inmates normally enjoy. These may include:
Visitation Rights: Temporary or permanent suspension of in-person or virtual visits.
Canteen Access: Loss of access to purchase snacks, toiletries, or other items from the prison commissary.
Mail and Phone Use: Limitations on sending or receiving mail or making phone calls.
Recreational Activities: Loss of yard time, access to exercise equipment, or participation in group activities.
Confinement to Quarters
Inmates who commit certain violations may be confined to their quarters for a set period. This penalty involves restricting the inmate to their housing unit, preventing participation in communal activities.
Duration: Up to 10 days for administrative violations.
Program Reassignment or Suspension
Inmates who refuse to participate in assigned programs, such as work assignments, education classes, or rehabilitation initiatives, may face:
Reassignment: Removal from their current program and placement into a less desirable one.
Privilege Group Downgrade: Placement into privilege group B or C, resulting in fewer benefits and opportunities.
Mandatory Counseling or Drug Testing
Violations involving drug or alcohol use often result in mandatory participation in counseling programs or random drug testing. Examples include:
Alcohol Counseling: Required attendance in substance abuse recovery sessions.
Random Drug Testing: Periodic testing to ensure compliance with sobriety expectations.
Loss of Personal Property or Appliances
Inmates may lose access to personal items such as:
Televisions, radios, or other approved appliances.
Personal property, including items purchased through the canteen.
This penalty is often imposed to reinforce compliance with institutional rules.
Additional Penalties for Serious Violations
Serious violations (documented using Form 115A) carry harsher penalties. Examples include:
Referral for Prosecution: Serious violations involving criminal behavior, such as violence or possession of contraband, may be referred to the local district attorney for prosecution. Convictions could lead to additional criminal charges and sentences.
Isolation or Segregation: Inmates may be placed in administrative segregation or solitary confinement, isolating them from the general prison population.
Permanent Record Impacts: Documentation of serious violations is added to the inmate’s central file, potentially affecting:
Parole eligibility.
Participation in early release programs.
Potential for Child or Family Impact
In cases involving visitation violations or child endangerment, inmates may lose contact with their families or face additional restrictions, including supervised visitations.
Compounding Penalties for Repeated Violations
Repeated violations can lead to escalating penalties. For example:
Additional loss of good conduct credits.
Longer durations of privilege suspensions.
Harsher program restrictions.
Chronic rule-breaking can also harm an inmate’s reputation among prison staff and other inmates, further complicating their ability to reintegrate successfully into prison programs or society after release.
How Penalties Are Determined
The severity of the penalty depends on:
Nature of the Violation: Whether the act was classified as administrative or serious.
Circumstances: Factors such as intent, repeat offenses, and whether the violation posed a threat to prison safety.
Hearing Outcome: The decision made during the disciplinary hearing, which considers evidence, testimony, and any mitigating factors.
4. What are Legal Defenses for CDCR Form 115 Discipline?
When an inmate in a California state prison is accused of violating prison rules and receives a CDCR Form 115 Discipline Report, they are entitled to defend themselves against the allegations. Depending on the circumstances, there are several legal defenses that can be used to contest the charges during the disciplinary hearing. Below, we outline the most common defenses inmates may use when facing disciplinary action under the CDCR system.
Lack of Evidence
A fundamental defense against a Form 115 violation is the lack of sufficient evidence to prove the alleged infraction. For a hearing officer to find an inmate guilty of a rule violation, there must be credible and clear evidence to support the claim.
Example: If an inmate is accused of possessing contraband but no physical evidence or witness testimony ties them to the item, the lack of evidence can serve as a defense.
Defense Strategy: Question the reliability of witness statements, surveillance footage, or documentation that implicates the inmate.
Procedural Violations
CDCR disciplinary procedures must be followed meticulously. If prison staff fail to adhere to these protocols, it may provide grounds for contesting the violation. Examples of procedural errors include:
Failing to issue the Form 115 within the required 15 days of the alleged infraction.
Holding the disciplinary hearing beyond the 30-day timeline without justification.
Not providing the inmate with proper notice of the charges or hearing.
Defense Strategy: Demonstrate how these procedural errors impacted the fairness of the hearing or the inmate’s ability to prepare a defense.
Misidentification
In some cases, the inmate accused of the violation may not be the person who committed the act. Misidentification can occur due to:
Mistaken identity by a prison official or guard.
Confusion during chaotic incidents, such as fights or disturbances.
Example: An inmate is accused of participating in a fight, but surveillance footage or witness testimony reveals they were not involved.
Defense Strategy: Provide evidence, such as alibi witnesses or surveillance footage, to prove the inmate was not responsible.
No Violation of Rules
A common defense is that the inmate’s actions did not actually violate prison rules or that the behavior was misinterpreted.
Example: An inmate is accused of failing to comply with a work assignment but has medical documentation proving they were unable to participate due to illness or injury.
Defense Strategy: Clarify the circumstances of the alleged violation and provide documentation or testimony to show that no rule was broken.
Inadequate Investigation
For serious violations, inmates have the right to a pre-hearing investigation. If the investigation was incomplete or biased, it may weaken the case against the inmate.
Example: Witnesses who could support the inmate’s defense were not interviewed, or important evidence was not considered.
Defense Strategy: Highlight gaps in the investigation and request additional evidence or witness testimony.
Retaliation or Bias
In some cases, a Form 115 may be issued unfairly due to retaliation or bias by prison staff.
Example: A guard issues a false disciplinary report because of a personal conflict with the inmate or as retaliation for filing a grievance against the staff member.
Defense Strategy: Provide evidence of the retaliation or bias, such as a history of grievances or statements from other inmates.
Inability to Participate in the Process
Inmates have the right to participate in their disciplinary hearing, but certain circumstances can hinder their ability to do so. These situations can serve as a defense if they impact the outcome of the hearing:
Serious Mental Health Issues: If an inmate’s mental health condition prevents them from understanding the charges or participating effectively in the hearing.
Language Barriers or Illiteracy: If the inmate does not speak English or is illiterate, they have the right to a staff assistant to ensure they understand the process.
Defense Strategy: Argue that the inmate was denied proper assistance or accommodations, making the hearing unfair.
Right to Call Witnesses or Present Evidence
Inmates accused of serious violations have the right to:
Call witnesses to testify on their behalf.
Present evidence in their defense.
If these rights are denied, it may constitute grounds to challenge the violation.
Example: An inmate requests a witness who could corroborate their innocence, but the hearing officer denies the request without valid justification.
Defense Strategy: Appeal based on the denial of procedural rights and demonstrate how the missing evidence or testimony could have influenced the outcome.
Legitimate Emergency or Necessity
An inmate may argue that their actions were justified due to an emergency or necessity.
Example: An inmate leaves their assigned area without permission to assist another inmate experiencing a medical emergency.
Defense Strategy: Show that the violation was necessary to prevent harm or respond to an urgent situation.
Insufficient Training or Guidance
Sometimes inmates unknowingly violate rules due to a lack of proper training or unclear communication of the rules.
Example: An inmate is accused of improperly storing items in their cell, but they were never informed of the specific storage guidelines.
Defense Strategy: Argue that the violation occurred due to insufficient guidance from prison staff and request leniency.
our clients say it best
Client Testimonials
5. What are Related Offenses to CDCR Form 115 Discipline?
Protecting Your Rights, Defending Your Future
Get in touch with our lawyers today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help you. We are here to answer your questions and provide you with the support you need during this difficult time.
Client Satisfaction Is Priority
You Are More Than What They Say
We Always Go The Extra Mile