Destroy Arrest Records

Table of contents

Click To travel To Chapters

1. What is Destroy Arrest Records?

In California, arrest records are an official record of an individual’s interactions with law enforcement, including the arrest process, charges filed, and subsequent legal proceedings. While an arrest does not necessarily result in a conviction, having an arrest record can still have serious consequences for an individual’s reputation and future opportunities. “Destroying arrest records” refers to the legal process of eliminating these records, usually through expungement or sealing, which allows individuals to move forward without the burden of past arrests impacting their lives.

Under California law, it is possible to request the destruction of arrest records under specific circumstances, but this is not a process to be taken lightly. Understanding the procedure, eligibility, and requirements for destroying arrest records is essential for anyone looking to clear their record.

How Can Arrest Records Be Destroyed?

Destroying or clearing arrest records is typically accomplished through expungement or sealing. These legal actions essentially remove or hide the arrest records from public view and may help individuals gain a fresh start. However, it is important to note that “destroying” arrest records does not literally erase them from all databases; it simply makes them inaccessible in most cases.

Expungement: In California, expungement is a legal process where a court removes an individual’s arrest record from public access. This may apply to cases where the person was arrested but not convicted, or if the charges were later dropped. Expungement generally involves filing a petition with the court and demonstrating that the person is eligible to have their record cleared.

Sealing Arrest Records: Sealing an arrest record is another option for those wishing to protect their privacy. Sealing essentially prevents the record from being accessed or used by the public or potential employers. Sealing may be an option if the individual was never convicted or if the conviction was overturned on appeal.

Who is Eligible to Destroy Their Arrest Records?

Eligibility for destroying or sealing arrest records varies depending on the specific circumstances of the case. Some of the general requirements include:

No Conviction: If you were arrested but never convicted of a crime, you may be eligible for expungement or sealing of the arrest record.
Dropped Charges: If charges were dropped or dismissed, individuals may also apply for record destruction.
Acquittal: If you were found not guilty of the charges, you might be able to seal or expunge the arrest record.
Diversion Programs: If you completed a diversion program, which is often offered to first-time offenders, you may also be eligible to expunge your arrest record.

2. What are examples of Destroy Arrest Records?

Destroying or clearing arrest records refers to the legal process of removing or sealing records related to an individual’s arrest from public view. While the term “destroying” may sound absolute, what it really entails is the legal action of either expunging or sealing an arrest record, preventing the public or potential employers from accessing this sensitive information. In California, clearing or sealing arrest records can significantly improve an individual’s prospects, particularly when it comes to employment, housing, and other opportunities.

Here are some examples of situations where arrest records may be destroyed or sealed under California law:

1. Expungement of Arrest Records After Charges are Dropped

One of the most common examples of destroying arrest records is when an individual’s charges are dropped or dismissed. In these cases, the person is generally considered to have not been convicted, and they may be eligible to expunge or seal the arrest record.

Example: A person is arrested on charges of theft, but after investigation, the charges are dropped due to lack of evidence. The individual may request that their arrest record be expunged or sealed, ensuring that the arrest does not impact their future.

2. Sealing Records After an Acquittal

If an individual is arrested and charged with a crime but later acquitted in court, they can petition to have their arrest records sealed or expunged. An acquittal means the person was found not guilty, and therefore, they may no longer want their arrest record to be accessible.

Example: An individual is arrested on charges of assault, but the court finds them not guilty after trial. They can then petition to have the arrest record sealed to prevent it from being used against them in the future.

3. Expungement After Completing a Diversion Program

In California, individuals who participate in certain diversion programs, often for first-time offenders, may be eligible to expunge their arrest records once they successfully complete the program. Diversion programs typically involve rehabilitation and may result in a case dismissal or reduction of charges.

Example: A person arrested for drug possession successfully completes a drug diversion program, which results in the charges being dismissed. After completion, they may file for expungement of the arrest record.

4. Sealing Records After Juvenile Arrests

In some cases, juveniles who have been arrested for a crime may be eligible to have their arrest records sealed. Juvenile records are typically sealed once the individual reaches the age of majority (18), but they may also petition the court earlier, especially if the individual has not been convicted or if charges were dropped.

Example: A teenager is arrested for vandalism but never convicted. After turning 18, they can petition the court to have their juvenile arrest record sealed, ensuring it doesn’t follow them into adulthood.

5. Expungement After Being Arrested but Never Charged

In situations where someone is arrested but never formally charged with a crime, they can still request the destruction of their arrest records. If the police or prosecutors decide not to file charges, the person may file a petition to expunge the record of the arrest itself.

Example: A person is arrested for suspected DUI but is never charged because the prosecutor finds insufficient evidence. This person can file for expungement to clear the arrest from their record.

6. Sealing Records After a Dismissal of Charges

In some cases, even if charges are filed, an individual’s record can be sealed if the case is dismissed before a conviction is reached. This is another way to clear an arrest record that may otherwise appear on a background check.

Example: A person is arrested for a crime and charges are formally filed. However, due to legal issues with the case (e.g., lack of evidence or witness testimony), the court dismisses the charges. The person may be eligible to seal the arrest record following the dismissal.

7. Expungement of Arrest Records Due to California Proposition 47

California Proposition 47, passed in 2014, allows individuals who have been convicted of certain nonviolent felonies to petition for reclassification of their offense as a misdemeanor. In many cases, this may allow for the sealing or expungement of any related arrest records.

Example: A person was arrested and convicted for felony drug possession years ago. Under Proposition 47, they can petition the court to have the felony reduced to a misdemeanor, and then potentially expunge or seal their arrest record related to that conviction.

8. Expungement After a Probation Violation

In certain circumstances, individuals who have violated probation but successfully completed the terms set by the court can have their arrest records expunged. This is often the case when an individual has committed a non-violent crime and the violation does not involve a new criminal offense.

Example: An individual was arrested for petty theft and placed on probation. They later violated their probation conditions but completed all requirements. After completing the probation requirements, they may be eligible to expunge their arrest record.

3. What are the penalties for Destroy Arrest Records?

In California, destroying or tampering with arrest records is a serious offense. The act of unlawfully destroying, altering, or concealing arrest records can result in significant legal consequences. This includes the potential for criminal charges, fines, and other penalties. Below, we will explore the legal implications and penalties related to destroying or tampering with arrest records under California law.

1. Legal Definition of Destroying Arrest Records

Destroying arrest records typically refers to the unlawful destruction, alteration, or removal of records related to an individual’s arrest. These records are maintained by law enforcement agencies, courts, and other government entities, and they are considered part of the public record. If someone intentionally destroys or tampers with these records to hide a past arrest, they could face criminal prosecution.

In some cases, people may try to destroy arrest records to prevent them from being accessible during background checks or to avoid the consequences of their criminal history becoming public. However, such actions are illegal and can have serious repercussions.

2. Penalties for Destroying Arrest Records

The penalties for destroying arrest records can vary depending on the circumstances and whether the individual is convicted under the applicable laws. Below are the key penalties that may apply:

a. Criminal Charges

Destroying or tampering with public records, including arrest records, is generally classified as a felony or a misdemeanor in California, depending on the severity of the crime and the intent behind the action. Criminal charges may include:

Felony Charges: In more serious cases, such as when the destruction of arrest records is done with fraudulent intent (e.g., to avoid legal consequences or conceal a crime), the individual may face felony charges. Felony convictions often carry harsher penalties, including significant fines and lengthy prison sentences.
Misdemeanor Charges: If the destruction is deemed less severe or unintentional, it may result in misdemeanor charges. A misdemeanor conviction can still result in serious consequences, including smaller fines, probation, and potential jail time.

b. Fines

California law imposes fines for individuals found guilty of destroying or tampering with arrest records. The fines can vary based on the severity of the offense. For felony charges, fines can range from several thousand dollars to tens of thousands of dollars. In misdemeanor cases, fines are typically lower but can still be significant.

c. Imprisonment

Individuals convicted of destroying or tampering with arrest records may face imprisonment. The length of the sentence will depend on whether the offense is classified as a felony or misdemeanor and other factors such as prior criminal history. For felonies, individuals could face several years in state prison. For misdemeanors, jail time may be shorter, but it can still be a substantial penalty.

d. Probation

In cases where a person is not sent to jail or prison, they may instead be placed on probation. During probation, the individual must comply with specific conditions set by the court, such as reporting regularly to a probation officer, attending counseling or rehabilitation programs, and staying out of trouble with the law. Violating the terms of probation can result in additional penalties, including jail time.

3. Other Consequences of Destroying Arrest Records

In addition to the criminal penalties mentioned above, there are other significant consequences associated with destroying arrest records:

a. Damage to Reputation

Being caught tampering with or destroying public records can severely damage an individual’s reputation. Such behavior suggests an attempt to hide a criminal past, which can raise suspicion and cause others to question the person’s integrity. This can have a lasting effect on personal and professional relationships.

b. Difficulty in Clearing Criminal Records

Individuals who attempt to destroy or tamper with arrest records may also face difficulties when trying to clear their criminal record legally. If the court or law enforcement agency discovers that the records have been tampered with, this can complicate any efforts to expunge or seal arrest records, as tampering undermines the legitimacy of the process.

c. Legal Costs

If someone is caught destroying arrest records, they may face significant legal fees as they try to navigate the criminal justice system. Legal defense costs, fines, and the potential costs of an extended court process can be financially burdensome.

4. Exceptions to Destroying Arrest Records

In some cases, individuals may legally request the destruction or sealing of arrest records, such as when charges were dropped, dismissed, or when the person was acquitted. California law allows for the expungement of arrest records under certain circumstances. However, this must be done through proper legal procedures, and tampering with records outside these avenues is illegal.

4. What are legal defenses for Destroy Arrest Records?

Destroying arrest records is a serious offense in California and is treated as a criminal act. If someone is accused of tampering with, altering, or destroying arrest records, they could face significant legal consequences. However, there are several legal defenses that may apply to such charges, depending on the circumstances of the case.

In this article, we will explore the common defenses to destroying arrest records and how a skilled criminal defense attorney can help individuals facing such charges.

1. Lack of Intent

One of the most common defenses in a case involving the destruction of arrest records is the argument that the defendant lacked the intent to commit the crime. Under California law, tampering with public records, including arrest records, typically requires a specific intent to deceive or obstruct justice.

If the defendant can prove that they did not intend to destroy or alter the records, they may be able to avoid conviction. For example, if the defendant accidentally disposed of the records without realizing their importance or due to a clerical error, this lack of intent could serve as a valid defense.

In legal terms, if the destruction was unintentional and there was no malicious purpose behind it, the defendant may not be guilty of a crime. Proving a lack of intent is often essential in cases involving charges for destroying public records.

2. Mistake of Fact

A “mistake of fact” is another potential defense in cases involving the destruction of arrest records. In this defense, the defendant argues that they acted under a mistaken belief about a key fact related to the case.

For example, an individual may destroy arrest records because they believe they were legally allowed to do so or that the records were no longer needed. If the defendant had a reasonable belief that they had the legal right to destroy the records or that the records were no longer in effect, this could be considered a defense to the charges.

It is important to note that a mistake of fact must be reasonable. A defendant cannot use this defense if they acted recklessly or with disregard for the law.

3. Lack of Knowledge

If the defendant did not know that the arrest records existed or that the records were subject to legal protection, this could serve as a valid defense. In some cases, individuals may not be aware that certain records are considered public or that they should be preserved. For instance, if a person accidentally discarded arrest records without realizing their significance, lack of knowledge could be an effective defense.

The prosecution would need to prove that the defendant knew about the records and had the ability to act on that knowledge. If the defendant can show that they were unaware of the records’ existence, they may not be convicted of destroying them.

4. Unlawful Search or Seizure

In some cases, the evidence against the defendant may have been obtained through an unlawful search or seizure. If the arrest records were obtained in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights, such as through an illegal search or seizure, the evidence may be inadmissible in court.

Under the exclusionary rule, evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment may be excluded from court proceedings. If a criminal defense attorney can show that the evidence was gathered improperly, the case against the defendant could be weakened or dismissed altogether.

This defense is more commonly used in cases where law enforcement illegally seizes records or other evidence, but it can still be relevant in cases of destruction if the records in question were improperly obtained.

5. Record Destruction Was Authorized

In some instances, individuals may be authorized to destroy certain arrest records under California law. For example, records may be eligible for expungement or sealing in specific circumstances. If the defendant can show that they were legally permitted to destroy or remove the records based on the legal status of their case (such as a dismissed charge or acquittal), this could be a defense.

For example, California law allows individuals who were arrested but not convicted of a crime to petition to have their arrest records sealed or destroyed. If the defendant was acting in accordance with the legal procedures for record expungement or sealing, they may be justified in destroying or altering the records.

6. False Accusations

In some cases, individuals may be falsely accused of destroying arrest records. False accusations can occur for various reasons, such as personal vendettas, misunderstandings, or mistakes by law enforcement. If the defendant can show that the charges are based on false information or that they were not involved in the destruction of the records, they may be able to successfully defend themselves.

This defense typically requires the defendant to provide evidence or testimony that disproves the allegations and shows that they were not responsible for destroying the records.

7. Insufficient Evidence

Finally, a defense strategy could be based on the argument that the prosecution does not have enough evidence to prove that the defendant destroyed the arrest records. To convict someone of a crime, the prosecution must prove each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. If the prosecution fails to present sufficient evidence that the defendant intentionally destroyed or tampered with the arrest records, the charges may be dropped or the defendant may be acquitted.

A skilled criminal defense attorney can work to challenge the prosecution’s evidence, including by disputing the chain of custody of the records, pointing out inconsistencies in the case, or questioning the credibility of witnesses.

our clients say it best

Client Testimonials

5. What are related offenses to Destroy Arrest Records?

Destroying arrest records is a serious criminal offense in California, but it is often linked to other criminal activities that involve the manipulation or destruction of public records or official documents. Understanding the related offenses can help individuals facing charges for this crime to fully grasp the potential legal implications and the broader context of such charges.

In this article, we will explore several crimes that are closely related to destroying arrest records, such as falsifying records, tampering with evidence, and obstructing justice.

1. Falsifying or Forging Public Records (Penal Code § 115)

Falsifying or forging public records is a crime under California Penal Code § 115. This offense involves the intentional creation, alteration, or falsification of public documents with the intent to deceive or defraud others. Public records include a wide range of documents, such as birth certificates, death certificates, contracts, and police reports.

If someone destroys arrest records to conceal criminal activity or to mislead authorities, they could face charges for both destroying the records and falsifying public documents. In cases where the destruction of records is accompanied by efforts to fabricate or alter them, this offense could carry severe penalties, including imprisonment and fines.

2. Tampering with Evidence (Penal Code § 141)

Tampering with evidence is a criminal offense under California Penal Code § 141. This crime occurs when a person intentionally alters, conceals, or destroys evidence with the intent to obstruct or influence an investigation or trial. Evidence tampering is often associated with crimes such as bribery, witness tampering, or obstruction of justice.

Destroying arrest records can be seen as a form of evidence tampering, particularly if the individual is trying to prevent the discovery of a prior arrest or conviction. Whether the person is attempting to obstruct an ongoing investigation or hide a previous criminal history, charges for tampering with evidence are serious and can lead to significant criminal penalties, including prison time.

3. Obstruction of Justice (Penal Code § 118.1)

Obstruction of justice involves actions that interfere with the administration of justice or impede the legal process. Under California Penal Code § 118.1, individuals can be charged with obstructing justice if they knowingly and willfully interfere with law enforcement activities, investigations, or legal proceedings.

Destroying arrest records can be considered obstruction of justice if the purpose of the act is to prevent the discovery of information that could be used in a criminal case. Whether the destruction is meant to conceal a previous crime or hinder the prosecution of an ongoing case, obstruction of justice charges may be applicable in situations where arrest records are intentionally destroyed to frustrate justice.

4. Identity Theft (Penal Code § 530.5)

In some cases, the destruction of arrest records may be part of a broader scheme to commit identity theft. Under California Penal Code § 530.5, identity theft occurs when someone knowingly uses another person’s personal information, such as their name, Social Security number, or date of birth, without authorization, typically to commit fraud or other criminal activities.

Destroying arrest records could be part of an effort to conceal a person’s criminal history to obtain a job, loan, or other benefits under a false identity. If the destruction of arrest records is tied to identity theft, the penalties can be severe and may involve both state charges and federal charges, depending on the scope of the crime.

5. Conspiracy to Commit a Crime (Penal Code § 182)

Conspiracy to commit a crime is an offense under California Penal Code § 182. This charge applies when two or more people agree to commit a crime and take steps toward its completion. If multiple individuals collaborate to destroy arrest records or otherwise alter public records to conceal criminal activity, they could be charged with conspiracy.

In cases where a group is involved in the destruction of arrest records or related offenses, conspiracy charges can carry severe consequences. Even if the crime itself is relatively minor, the act of conspiring to commit a crime can result in significant penalties, including imprisonment.

6. Perjury (Penal Code § 118)

Perjury is the act of knowingly lying or making false statements under oath, and it is a crime under California Penal Code § 118. If someone destroys arrest records to avoid having to testify to certain facts or provide truthful information in court, they could face charges for perjury.

For example, if a defendant is asked under oath about their criminal history and they destroy arrest records to avoid revealing prior arrests, this could lead to perjury charges. Since perjury is considered a felony, it can carry severe penalties, including imprisonment and substantial fines.

7. Destruction of Government Property (Penal Code § 502.5)

The destruction of government property, including public records like arrest records, is a violation under California Penal Code § 502.5. This offense applies when a person intentionally destroys, alters, or damages government property, with the intention of disrupting government operations or preventing the government from performing its functions.

In cases where the destruction of arrest records is considered the intentional destruction of government property, the person could face charges under this statute. Depending on the circumstances, the penalties could include imprisonment, fines, and restitution.

8. Unlawful Access to Criminal Justice Databases (Penal Code § 502.6)

California Penal Code § 502.6 makes it illegal to gain unauthorized access to criminal justice databases, such as those maintained by law enforcement agencies, in order to alter, destroy, or remove records. If an individual gains illegal access to a law enforcement database to destroy arrest records, they could face charges for unlawfully accessing and tampering with the data.

This offense is taken seriously, and penalties can include prison time, heavy fines, and long-term consequences for one’s criminal record. The destruction of records through unauthorized access to criminal justice databases is an especially serious crime that could result in both state and federal charges.

Protecting Your Rights, Defending Your Future

Get in touch with our lawyers today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help you. We are here to answer your questions and provide you with the support you need during this difficult time.

Client Satisfaction Is Priority

You Are More Than What They Say

We Always Go The Extra Mile

Get A Free Consult

818.650.1744

@Gracelegalgroup