§ 4463 CVC - Disability Placard Forgery
Table of contents
Click To travel To Chapters
1. What is Disability Placard Forgery?
2. What are examples of Disability Placard Forgery?
California Vehicle Code § 4463 deals with vehicle registration fraud, and one of the most serious offenses under this statute is disability placard forgery. This crime involves altering, forging, or using fraudulent disability placards with the intent to gain parking privileges or other benefits designated for individuals with disabilities. Disability placards are meant for those who have legitimate physical disabilities that impair their ability to walk long distances, providing them with access to special parking spaces and other accommodations. However, some individuals attempt to exploit these privileges by forging or using fake disability placards.
Here are a few examples that demonstrate how disability placard forgery can occur under California Vehicle Code § 4463:
1. Creating a Fake Disability Placard
One of the most straightforward forms of disability placard forgery is the creation of a fake placard. This involves designing and printing a fraudulent disability placard that mimics the official placards issued by the California DMV. The fake placard may include forged logos, signatures, and other identifying information to make it appear genuine. The person creating the placard may have no legal right to obtain such a permit but forges the document in an attempt to gain access to special parking spaces.
Example: Alex, who does not have a disability, decides to create a fake disability placard by printing one from the internet. He uses this placard to park in handicapped spots near his workplace, avoiding the need to walk far. Alex is committing disability placard forgery under § 4463 CVC.
2. Altering an Existing Placard
Another form of disability placard forgery involves altering an existing placard. This may include changing details like the expiration date, the name of the registered person, or the medical condition associated with the placard to make it seem valid when it has expired or was not issued for the individual using it.
Example: Sarah has a legitimate disability placard that expired last month. Instead of renewing the placard with the DMV, she alters the expiration date on the placard to make it appear current. She uses the altered placard to park in disabled parking spaces, committing disability placard forgery.
3. Using a Fraudulent Placard
In some cases, individuals may not create or alter the placard themselves but still commit forgery by using a fraudulent placard. This involves possessing or displaying a forged or altered placard, even if the person didn’t directly make the forgery. If they use or display the forged placard with the intent to deceive, they can be charged under § 4463 CVC.
Example: James borrows his friend’s disability placard to park in a handicapped spot while attending a concert. His friend had obtained the placard through fraudulent means but James is unaware that it is fake. Even though James didn’t forge the placard himself, by using it inappropriately, he can still face charges for disability placard forgery.
4. Possessing Blank or Incomplete Placards with Fraudulent Intent
Sometimes, individuals may possess blank or incomplete disability placards with the intention of forging them later. Simply possessing these materials with the intent to forge or alter them can be grounds for prosecution under California law. This is considered an act of preparation for committing the crime of forgery.
Example: Lucas is caught by police in possession of several blank, unissued disability placards in his car, along with a list of names and identification numbers. He intended to forge these placards for resale to people who wanted to park in handicapped spaces. Lucas can be charged with possession of fraudulent disability placards under § 4463 CVC.
5. Passing or Attempting to Pass a Fake Placard as Genuine
If someone attempts to pass off a fake disability placard as genuine—whether by submitting it to the DMV, presenting it to law enforcement, or displaying it on a vehicle—they can be charged under § 4463 CVC. The key factor is that they knowingly present the forged placard as if it were real, with the intent to deceive and gain benefits reserved for people with disabilities.
Example: Megan goes to the DMV and attempts to renew a disability placard that she has altered to reflect a longer expiration date. She tries to pass off the altered placard as authentic to avoid paying for the renewal fee. Megan is guilty of attempting to pass a fraudulent placard as genuine under the law.
6. Fraudulent Use of a Disability Placard for Business Purposes
In some cases, individuals may use disability placards to gain access to premium parking for business purposes or to avoid parking fees. This is an example of how disability placard forgery is sometimes exploited for financial gain or convenience.
Example: Paul, the owner of a delivery service, regularly uses a forged disability placard on his company van. By doing so, he avoids paying for parking in premium spots and gains easier access to locations in busy areas. Paul is committing fraud by misusing a disability placard to benefit his business.
3. What are the penalties for Disability Placard Forgery?
Disability placard forgery is a serious offense under California law, falling under California Vehicle Code § 4463. This section of the law makes it illegal to forge, alter, or use fraudulent disability placards with the intent to deceive, allowing individuals to illegally access privileges reserved for those with disabilities, such as parking in handicapped spaces. The penalties for violating § 4463 CVC can be severe, ranging from misdemeanor charges to felony convictions, depending on the nature of the offense and the circumstances surrounding it.
If you or someone you know is facing charges for disability placard forgery, it’s important to understand the legal consequences. Below is an overview of the potential penalties under California law for disability placard forgery.
Misdemeanor vs. Felony: Understanding the “Wobbler” Nature of the Offense
Disability placard forgery is considered a “wobbler” offense under California law, meaning that it can be charged either as a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the severity of the crime and the defendant’s criminal history.
Misdemeanor Charges: In less severe cases or where the defendant has no prior criminal history, the offense may be charged as a misdemeanor.
Felony Charges: In cases involving aggravating factors, such as previous convictions for similar offenses, or where the fraud is deemed particularly severe, the defendant may face felony charges.
Misdemeanor Penalties for Disability Placard Forgery
If convicted of disability placard forgery as a misdemeanor, the penalties can include:
Up to 1 Year in County Jail: The defendant may be sentenced to up to one year in a county jail.
A Fine of Up to $1,000: The court may impose a fine of up to $1,000, in addition to other penalties.
Probation: The defendant may be sentenced to probation, either formal or informal (summary), depending on the court’s decision. Probation may come with conditions such as regular check-ins with a probation officer, attending counseling or education programs, and avoiding further legal violations.
Felony Penalties for Disability Placard Forgery
If the offense is charged as a felony, the penalties can be far more severe. These penalties may include:
Up to 3 Years in County Jail: The defendant could face 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years in county jail under California’s realignment program. Realignment refers to the state’s policy of housing certain offenders in county jails rather than state prisons.
A Fine of Up to $10,000: In addition to jail time, the defendant could face a fine of up to $10,000 as part of their punishment.
Formal Probation: If the defendant is sentenced to probation instead of jail, it will be formal probation, meaning the defendant will be subject to stricter supervision by a probation officer and may face additional conditions such as mandatory drug testing, fines, or restitution.
Additional Consequences
Aside from the direct penalties outlined above, individuals convicted of disability placard forgery may also face other consequences, including:
Driver’s License Consequences: If the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) believes that you committed fraud in any application you made to them, they may suspend, revoke, or refuse to issue or renew your California driver’s license. This can significantly impact your ability to legally drive in California, especially if the fraud is related to your vehicle registration or disability placard application.
Inability to Obtain a Disability Placard in the Future: A conviction for disability placard forgery could result in the DMV refusing to issue a disability placard in the future, leaving the defendant without access to the benefits and privileges that come with it.
Factors That Influence Penalties
While the penalties for disability placard forgery are set out under the law, several factors can influence how a court decides to charge and sentence someone convicted under § 4463 CVC:
Prior Criminal History: If the defendant has a history of committing similar offenses or other criminal behavior, the court may impose harsher penalties. A previous conviction for vehicle registration fraud or another form of forgery could lead to felony charges for disability placard forgery.
The Extent of the Fraud: The scale of the fraud can also affect sentencing. If the individual forged or used multiple placards or forged placards with the intent to sell them for profit, the court may lean toward more severe penalties. Similarly, attempting to pass fraudulent placards as legitimate in multiple instances could increase the severity of the offense.
Use of the Fraudulent Placard: The defendant’s actions with the forged or altered placard can influence the charges. For instance, using a forged placard to gain an unfair advantage in business (such as avoiding parking fees or accessing exclusive areas) may be seen as more egregious than using a placard for personal convenience.
Intent to Defraud: Disability placard forgery is a crime of intent. If the defendant can show that they did not have fraudulent intent, they may be able to avoid a conviction or reduce their charges. For example, if the defendant was unaware that the placard was fraudulent or was misled by another person, it could be a mitigating factor in their case.
4. What are legal defenses for Disability Placard Forgery?
Disability placard forgery is a serious criminal offense under California Vehicle Code § 4463. It involves forging, altering, or using fraudulent disability placards to gain access to benefits such as parking in disabled spaces or avoiding parking fees. If you are facing charges for disability placard forgery, it is crucial to understand the legal defenses available to you. In California, there are several potential defenses that can be used to contest charges of disability placard forgery and to protect your rights in court.
Here, we will explore the most common and effective legal defenses to a charge of disability placard forgery under California Vehicle Code § 4463.
1. Lack of Intent to Defraud
One of the key elements of a disability placard forgery charge is the intent to defraud. Fraud involves an intentional act of deception for personal or financial gain. Without the intent to deceive, there is no crime under California law.
If you can demonstrate that you did not intend to defraud the DMV, law enforcement, or anyone else, you may be able to have the charges dismissed or reduced. For example:
Unknowingly Using a Forged Placard: If you used a disability placard without knowing it was fraudulent (such as when a friend or family member gave it to you without disclosing that it was fake), you can argue that you lacked fraudulent intent.
No Knowledge of Forgery: If you were unaware that a placard you received or used was forged or altered, this lack of intent to defraud could serve as a strong defense. The prosecution must prove that you knowingly used or displayed a fraudulent placard, and without this element, the charges may be weakened or dropped.
Example: Maria borrowed her mother’s disability placard to use while parking for a doctor’s appointment. She did not know that her mother had altered the placard. Maria had no intention of committing fraud, and thus, lacked the intent required for a conviction under § 4463 CVC.
2. Mistaken Identity or False Allegations
Another defense that could be used in a disability placard forgery case is mistaken identity or false allegations. This defense involves arguing that you are being wrongfully accused of the crime, often due to a misunderstanding or false information.
Wrongful Identification: In some cases, a person may be accused of using a fraudulent placard when, in fact, someone else is responsible for the forgery. For example, if a person was unknowingly given a fraudulent placard, they may argue that they were misidentified as the one committing the forgery.
False Claims by Another Party: If someone else made false claims about your involvement in the forgery or fraud, this could also serve as a defense. For example, a person who lent you the placard might falsely claim that you knew it was forged.
Example: John is accused of using a fake disability placard while driving his vehicle. However, he can prove that the placard was given to him by a friend, who later admitted to forging it. John can use this defense to show he was not responsible for the forgery.
3. Insufficient Evidence
In many cases, insufficient evidence is one of the most effective defenses. If the prosecution cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you were involved in the forgery or knew that the placard was fake, the charges may be dropped or reduced.
Lack of Physical Evidence: If there is no tangible evidence linking you to the forgery—such as no fingerprints, forged documents, or surveillance footage showing your involvement—then the prosecution may have a weak case against you.
Circumstantial Evidence: Often, forgery cases rely heavily on circumstantial evidence, which means the evidence does not directly point to guilt but instead suggests that the defendant was likely involved. Circumstantial evidence can be much less convincing than direct evidence and may not meet the high burden of proof required in criminal cases.
Example: Emily is accused of using a forged disability placard, but there is no direct evidence that she altered or created the placard. The prosecution relies on circumstantial evidence, such as her being in possession of the placard. Since this evidence alone is not enough to prove her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, Emily’s defense attorney could argue that the case lacks sufficient evidence.
4. Possession Without Intent to Use Fraudulently
Sometimes, people may find themselves in possession of a fraudulent placard, but without the intent to use it for fraudulent purposes. If you can show that you had the placard without intending to deceive anyone or use it to gain an unfair advantage, you may be able to avoid conviction.
Possession with No Intent to Use: If you had a fraudulent placard but never used it or attempted to use it for personal gain, you may be able to argue that you were merely in possession of it unknowingly, or with no fraudulent intent.
No Knowledge of Its Use for Fraud: Even if you knew the placard was not legitimate, you could argue that you never intended to use it in any way that would defraud the system or benefit personally from its use.
Example: Alan was given a disability placard by a relative who had forged it. Alan kept it in his car but never displayed it or used it. He could argue that his mere possession of the placard without using it fraudulently does not meet the criteria for a conviction under § 4463 CVC.
5. You Did Not Know the Placard Was Forged
In some cases, the defendant may argue that they did not know the placard was forged and that they were a victim of someone else’s actions. If you can prove that you did not know the placard was fraudulent when you received or used it, you may avoid a conviction for forgery.
Unaware the Placard Was Forged: If you were given the placard by someone else and had no reason to believe it was fraudulent, this can be a valid defense. The prosecution must prove that you knew the placard was fake, and if they cannot establish this, the case may be dismissed.
Example: Lisa received a disability placard as a gift from her elderly neighbor, who had forged it. Lisa used it without knowing it was fake. Since she had no knowledge of the forgery, she may be able to avoid a conviction.
our clients say it best
Client Testimonials
5. What are related offenses to Disability Placard Forgery?
Protecting Your Rights, Defending Your Future
Get in touch with our lawyers today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help you. We are here to answer your questions and provide you with the support you need during this difficult time.
Client Satisfaction Is Priority
You Are More Than What They Say
We Always Go The Extra Mile