Penal Code § 135 PC - Destroying or Concealing Evidence
1. What is Penal Code § 135 PC?
Penal Code § 135 PC Law Reads As Followed:
Penal Code § 135 PC makes it a misdemeanor for any person to willfully destroy, mutilate, or conceal evidence that may be used in a legal proceeding, such as a trial, inquiry, or investigation. The intent behind this crime is to obstruct justice by preventing relevant evidence from being presented in court. The law requires that the person knowingly and intentionally hides or destroys the evidence with the purpose of preventing its use in a legal matter.
2. What Are Examples of Penal Code § 135 PC?
In California, Penal Code § 135 PC makes it a crime to destroy, conceal, or alter evidence with the intent to prevent it from being used in a legal proceeding. This statute is aimed at preventing individuals from obstructing justice by tampering with or eliminating evidence that could be critical to a criminal investigation or trial.
Understanding the types of actions that may be considered a violation of Penal Code § 135 PC is important for anyone who might find themselves facing charges under this law. In this article, we’ll explore examples of what constitutes destroying or concealing evidence and how these actions might lead to criminal charges.
1. Destroying Documents or Records
One of the most common examples of Penal Code § 135 PC is the deliberate destruction of documents, papers, or records that could be used as evidence in a legal proceeding. This could include:
Shredding or burning documents that are part of an investigation or could be used in court.
Deleting electronic files such as emails, texts, or digital records that are relevant to an ongoing investigation.
Example: A business owner who destroys financial records that may be used to prove tax fraud could be charged with destroying evidence under Penal Code § 135 PC.
In such cases, the defendant must have knowingly destroyed the documents with the intent to prevent them from being introduced as evidence during a trial, inquiry, or investigation.
2. Hiding Physical Evidence
Another example of violating Penal Code § 135 PC involves concealing physical evidence that is related to a crime or investigation. This could include hiding items like weapons, drugs, or clothing that might link an individual to a crime. Common methods of concealing evidence include:
Hiding a weapon used in a crime to prevent it from being found by law enforcement.
Placing illegal substances in a location where authorities are unlikely to find them.
Example: After committing a robbery, a suspect hides the stolen items in a neighbor’s house to avoid detection by law enforcement. If these items were to be used as evidence in the robbery trial, the defendant could face charges for concealing evidence under Penal Code § 135 PC.
3. Altering Evidence
Altering evidence with the intention of changing its appearance to mislead investigators is another example of violating Penal Code § 135 PC. Altering evidence can involve tampering with physical items or electronic data, such as:
Changing the time stamp on digital files to alter the timeline of events.
Modifying or erasing security camera footage to remove evidence of a crime.
Tampering with witness statements or records to make them appear different than originally presented.
Example: A person edits video surveillance footage to remove their presence at a crime scene. By doing so, they are altering evidence with the intent to mislead law enforcement or the courts.
4. Destroying DNA Evidence
In cases involving violent crimes such as murder, assault, or sexual offenses, DNA evidence can play a crucial role in linking a suspect to the crime. Destroying or concealing DNA evidence can have severe legal consequences. Common actions include:
Washing off blood or bodily fluids from clothing or a crime scene.
Destroying personal items such as a towel, piece of clothing, or a weapon that could contain DNA evidence.
Example: After an altercation, an individual wipes off blood from their hands or clothes, hoping to prevent DNA evidence from linking them to the victim. This act of destroying potential evidence could lead to charges under Penal Code § 135 PC.
5. Destroying or Concealing Digital Evidence
In today’s digital age, electronic evidence such as text messages, emails, social media posts, and online transactions can play an essential role in criminal investigations. Destroying or concealing digital evidence is another form of obstruction of justice under Penal Code § 135 PC. Examples of such actions include:
Deleting incriminating text messages or emails that could be used as evidence.
Erasing browser history or files that could link the individual to illegal activities.
Wiping a smartphone or computer clean of data that could be used in a criminal investigation.
Example: A person is investigated for online fraud and deletes all their emails with their co-conspirator to prevent law enforcement from accessing crucial evidence. This would be considered an act of concealing evidence under Penal Code § 135 PC.
6. Hiding or Destroying Drug Evidence
In drug-related cases, concealing or destroying drugs or paraphernalia used to commit the offense is another example of evidence tampering. Actions such as:
Swallowing drugs to eliminate them before being searched by law enforcement.
Throwing drugs out of a window to avoid detection during a traffic stop.
Example: During a police search, a suspect swallows a bag of illegal drugs to prevent it from being used as evidence. This would be a clear violation of Penal Code § 135 PC.
7. Concealing Evidence by Moving it to Another Location
In some cases, an individual may move evidence from one place to another to prevent it from being discovered by law enforcement. This could involve:
Transferring stolen property to a different location to hide it from investigators.
Transporting a weapon to another location after a shooting or violent crime to avoid it being found at the crime scene.
Example: A suspect who committed a crime hides the weapon used in the crime in a friend’s garage to prevent it from being discovered by police. This would be considered concealing evidence under Penal Code § 135 PC.
3. What are Common Defenses Against Penal Code § 135 PC?
In California, Penal Code § 135 PC makes it a crime to destroy, conceal, or alter evidence with the intent to prevent it from being used in a legal proceeding, such as a trial or investigation. The intent behind this law is to preserve the integrity of the legal system by preventing individuals from obstructing justice. However, there are several legal defenses that can be raised to challenge a charge under Penal Code § 135 PC.
Understanding these defenses is crucial for anyone facing accusations of destroying or concealing evidence. In this article, we will discuss some common defenses used in cases involving charges under Penal Code § 135 PC.
1. Lack of Willfulness
One of the most common defenses to a charge of destroying or concealing evidence is lack of willfulness. To be convicted under Penal Code § 135 PC, the prosecutor must prove that the defendant acted willfully. This means the defendant must have intentionally destroyed or concealed evidence with the purpose of preventing it from being used in a legal proceeding.
If the defense can show that the defendant’s actions were accidental, not intentional, then the charge may not hold. For example, if someone accidentally throws away a piece of paper or deletes an email without realizing that it was evidence, they may not be guilty of willfully destroying or concealing evidence.
Example: A person cleans their desk and unknowingly throws away a document that could be relevant to a case. If the destruction was not intentional, this could be a valid defense.
2. No Knowledge of the Evidence’s Relevance
In addition to acting willfully, the defendant must have knowledge that the evidence they destroyed or concealed was relevant to an ongoing legal proceeding, such as a criminal investigation or trial. If the defendant did not know that the object they destroyed or concealed was going to be used as evidence, they may not be guilty under Penal Code § 135 PC.
If the defendant did not have any awareness that the item was evidence or could be used in a legal proceeding, this can serve as a defense against the charges.
Example: If someone discards a receipt that they believe is just ordinary trash and is unaware that it is relevant to an ongoing investigation, they may not be guilty of destroying evidence.
3. No Evidence Was Actually Destroyed or Concealed
Another defense to a Penal Code § 135 PC charge is that the defendant did not actually destroy or conceal any evidence. The law only applies to the destruction or concealment of objects that are relevant to a legal proceeding. If the object in question was not actually evidence, then the defendant cannot be convicted under this statute.
If the object destroyed or concealed was not relevant to the case, the defendant may argue that they were not obstructing justice. The defense can present evidence showing that the destroyed object had no bearing on the legal proceedings.
Example: A person throws away a receipt that is unrelated to any legal case. Since the receipt was not evidence in any trial, inquiry, or investigation, they would not be guilty of violating Penal Code § 135 PC.
4. No Ongoing Legal Proceeding
For Penal Code § 135 PC to apply, there must be an ongoing legal proceeding, such as a trial, inquiry, or criminal investigation. If no legal proceeding was taking place when the evidence was destroyed or concealed, then the defendant cannot be guilty of violating this statute.
This defense would be relevant in cases where the destruction of evidence occurred before any legal action or investigation began. If the defendant can prove that the destruction or concealment happened before the legal proceeding was initiated, they may be able to avoid a conviction.
Example: If someone destroys evidence before they are aware that an investigation or legal action has begun, they may be able to argue that there was no legal proceeding at the time of the offense.
5. Lack of Intent to Obstruct Justice
In some cases, a defense may argue that the defendant did not have the intent to obstruct justice by destroying or concealing evidence. If it can be shown that the destruction or concealment was done for reasons unrelated to hindering the legal process, this may be a valid defense.
Example: A person may have destroyed documents for personal reasons unrelated to the legal case, such as cleaning up their workspace or getting rid of irrelevant items. If there was no intention to interfere with the legal process, this could negate the charges.
6. False Accusation or Wrongful Arrest
It is also possible that a defendant was falsely accused of destroying or concealing evidence. In some situations, an individual might be wrongfully arrested based on mistaken identity, false claims, or a misunderstanding. If the defense can prove that the defendant was not involved in the destruction or concealment of evidence, the charges may be dismissed.
This defense often involves disproving the facts of the case, showing that the defendant had no involvement in the destruction of evidence, or that they were not responsible for the actions.
Example: A person may be accused of destroying evidence because someone else planted the evidence in their possession. If the defense can prove that the defendant was not responsible for the destruction or concealment of the evidence, the charges may be dropped.
7. Improper Search and Seizure
If evidence was obtained through an illegal search and seizure, it could be suppressed and excluded from the trial. In some cases, if law enforcement obtained evidence in violation of the defendant’s rights, the defendant may argue that any evidence against them should be thrown out.
If the destruction or concealment of evidence was discovered during an illegal search, the defendant could potentially avoid conviction for the charges.
Example: If law enforcement conducted a search without a valid warrant or probable cause and discovered evidence that the defendant allegedly destroyed, the defense might argue that the evidence was obtained unlawfully.
our clients say it best
Client Testimonials
4. What are The Penalties for Violating Penal Code § 135 PC?
In California, Penal Code § 135 PC makes it a crime to willfully destroy, conceal, or alter evidence with the intent to prevent it from being used in a legal proceeding, such as a trial, inquiry, or criminal investigation. This statute plays a crucial role in preserving the integrity of the legal system by criminalizing efforts to obstruct justice through the destruction or concealment of evidence.
If you or someone you know is facing charges under Penal Code § 135 PC, it’s essential to understand the potential penalties involved. In this article, we will outline the penalties for violating Penal Code § 135 PC, including the classification of the offense, the consequences of a conviction, and the potential legal outcomes.
1. Penal Code § 135 PC – Misdemeanor Offense
Penal Code § 135 PC is classified as a misdemeanor in California. This means that a conviction for destroying or concealing evidence typically results in less severe penalties compared to felony offenses. However, despite its misdemeanor status, it remains a serious crime, and the penalties can still have significant consequences for the defendant.
2. Potential Misdemeanor Penalties
If a defendant is convicted of violating Penal Code § 135 PC as a misdemeanor, they may face the following penalties:
Imprisonment in County Jail: The defendant can be sentenced to up to six months in county jail. The length of the jail sentence will depend on the circumstances of the case, the defendant’s criminal history, and whether the defendant chooses to negotiate a plea deal.
Fines: A misdemeanor conviction under Penal Code § 135 PC can also carry a maximum fine of up to $1,000. The court may impose a fine in addition to jail time or as a standalone penalty, depending on the severity of the offense and other factors considered during sentencing.
3. Factors That Can Affect Sentencing
While Penal Code § 135 PC is classified as a misdemeanor, there are certain factors that can influence the severity of the penalties. These include:
Criminal History: A defendant with prior convictions, particularly related to obstruction of justice or similar crimes, may face harsher penalties. Judges typically take criminal history into account when determining sentencing.
Intent and Circumstances of the Offense: If the defendant acted with extreme intent to obstruct justice, or if the destruction or concealment of evidence had significant consequences for the case or other individuals, the penalties may be more severe.
Aggravating or Mitigating Circumstances: In some cases, certain factors such as whether the evidence was critical to a high-profile case or whether the defendant showed remorse could affect the sentencing. Judges may consider these circumstances when determining whether to impose the maximum sentence or offer a reduced penalty.
4. Possible Alternative Sentencing Options
In some cases, an experienced criminal defense attorney may be able to negotiate an alternative sentence to jail time. These alternatives may include:
Probation: Instead of serving jail time, the defendant could be placed on probation, where they must comply with certain terms and conditions set by the court. These conditions may include regular check-ins with a probation officer, community service, attending counseling or anger management classes, or paying restitution to victims if applicable.
Diversion Programs: In certain cases, defendants who meet specific eligibility requirements may be able to participate in diversion programs, which allow for rehabilitation instead of jail time. If the defendant successfully completes the program, the charges may be reduced or dismissed.
5. Impact on Employment and Personal Life
While a Penal Code § 135 PC violation is a misdemeanor, a conviction can still have lasting consequences on the defendant’s personal and professional life. A criminal record can make it more difficult to secure employment, especially in fields that require security clearances or trust. Additionally, it could impact the defendant’s reputation and relationships.
However, in some cases, it is possible to have a conviction expunged after completing the terms of the sentence, such as probation or jail time. Expungement under Penal Code 1203.4 allows the individual to petition the court to remove the conviction from their criminal record, effectively restoring their legal rights.
6. Immigration Consequences
In most cases, a Penal Code § 135 PC conviction will not lead to significant immigration consequences for non-citizens. However, it is important to consult an immigration attorney if you are not a U.S. citizen. While this particular offense is not considered a deportable crime under U.S. immigration law, it could still affect a non-citizen’s immigration status, particularly if they have other criminal convictions or if the conviction affects their ability to apply for citizenship or permanent residency.
5. What Are the Related Offenses To Penal Code § 135 PC?
In California, Penal Code § 135 PC makes it a crime to willfully destroy, conceal, or alter evidence with the intent to prevent it from being used in a legal proceeding, such as a trial, investigation, or inquiry. This offense is classified as a misdemeanor and aims to protect the integrity of the judicial system by ensuring that individuals do not obstruct justice by tampering with evidence.
However, Penal Code § 135 PC is just one of many laws that deal with the illegal manipulation or obstruction of evidence. California’s criminal code contains several other statutes that target related actions, such as presenting false evidence, preparing false evidence, or planting evidence to mislead the court. In this article, we will explore the related offenses to Penal Code § 135 PC, which often carry similar, if not more severe, penalties.
1. Penal Code § 132 PC – Offering False Written Evidence
Penal Code § 132 PC criminalizes the act of offering false written evidence in a legal proceeding. This includes presenting forged documents, falsified signatures, or incorrect records to the court with the intent to deceive or mislead the judicial process.
Example: A person who presents a forged letter or fake contract to the court in an attempt to sway the outcome of a trial could be charged under Penal Code § 132 PC. This offense may involve documents that are critical to the case, such as fake alibis, financial records, or contracts.
The penalties for Penal Code § 132 PC can be severe, as the crime undermines the integrity of the judicial system and can affect the outcome of a case. Individuals convicted under this statute can face imprisonment, fines, or both.
2. Penal Code § 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence
Under Penal Code § 134 PC, it is a crime to prepare false evidence with the intent of using it in a legal proceeding. This offense involves the creation or modification of evidence that is designed to mislead or deceive the court or law enforcement authorities.
Example: A person who creates fake documents, such as a fraudulent will or a fake receipt, to support their claims in a legal dispute may be guilty of preparing false evidence. This statute covers the act of creating false documents, as well as the intent behind their preparation.
Convictions for Penal Code § 134 PC can result in serious consequences, including jail time and significant fines. The crime is considered more severe than merely offering false evidence because it involves the proactive preparation of deceptive materials.
3. Penal Code § 141 PC – Planting Evidence
Penal Code § 141 PC makes it a crime to plant evidence with the intent to frame someone else or mislead law enforcement. This offense is a form of evidence tampering and is distinct from Penal Code § 135 PC, which deals with the destruction or concealment of evidence.
Example: If an individual places drugs, weapons, or other incriminating materials in another person’s property, such as their car or home, to make it appear as if that person is guilty of a crime, they can be charged under Penal Code § 141 PC. Planting evidence is a serious crime because it not only interferes with the legal process but also wrongfully implicates an innocent person.
A conviction for Penal Code § 141 PC can carry severe penalties, including substantial prison time. The penalties are often more severe than those for Penal Code § 135 PC because planting evidence involves directly causing harm to an innocent party by making them appear guilty.
4. Penal Code § 134.5 PC – False Documentary Evidence in a Criminal Investigation
Penal Code § 134.5 PC criminalizes the act of creating or presenting false documentary evidence during a criminal investigation. This statute covers situations in which a person produces false documents or records with the intent to mislead investigators or law enforcement officials during the course of an investigation.
Example: A suspect who presents false documents, such as fake identification papers or forged financial statements, in an attempt to mislead law enforcement investigators could be charged under Penal Code § 134.5 PC.
The penalties for violating Penal Code § 134.5 PC can include imprisonment, fines, and other criminal sanctions, similar to the penalties for presenting or preparing false evidence under Penal Code § 132 and Penal Code § 134 PC.
5. Penal Code § 132.5 PC – False Evidence in the Possession of a Defendant
Penal Code § 132.5 PC addresses the possession of false evidence by a defendant with the intent to use it during a legal proceeding. If an individual knowingly possesses forged, fabricated, or altered evidence to support their case, they can be charged under this statute.
Example: A person involved in a criminal trial who hides or keeps forged documents or falsified records in their possession for the purpose of using them in court may face charges under Penal Code § 132.5 PC.
This offense is treated seriously because it demonstrates an effort to deceive the court and manipulate the outcome of the trial. Penalties can include significant fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity of the case and the evidence involved.
6. Penal Code § 137.1 PC – Intimidating or Influencing a Witness
While Penal Code § 135 PC deals with the destruction or concealment of evidence, Penal Code § 137.1 PC addresses the broader issue of witness tampering. This statute makes it a crime to intimidate or influence a witness in an attempt to prevent them from testifying or to alter their testimony.
Example: A person who pressures a witness to lie or threatens a witness to prevent them from testifying in court could face charges under Penal Code § 137.1 PC.
While this offense is distinct from evidence destruction or concealment, it is related in that both types of crimes aim to obstruct the legal process and affect the outcome of a case.
7. Penal Code § 185 PC – Obstructing Justice by Destroying Evidence
In some cases, individuals may be charged under Penal Code § 185 PC for obstructing justice by destroying evidence. This statute specifically addresses the act of destroying evidence to hinder a criminal investigation or prevent the prosecution of a crime.
Example: A person who destroys a weapon used in a crime to prevent law enforcement from discovering it could be charged with obstruction of justice under Penal Code § 185 PC.
The penalties for this offense depend on the severity of the obstruction, but it generally carries significant legal consequences, including potential jail time.
Protecting Your Rights, Defending Your Future
Get in touch with our lawyers today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help you. We are here to answer your questions and provide you with the support you need during this difficult time.
Client Satisfaction Is Priority
You Are More Than What They Say
We Always Go The Extra Mile