Penal Code § 487d1 PC - “Grand Theft Auto”
Table of contents
Click To travel To Chapters
1. What is Penal Code § 487d1 PC?
Penal Code § 487d1 PC Law Reads As Followed:
Penal Code § 487(d)(1) is a critical statute for Californians facing vehicle theft charges under “grand theft auto.” Emphasizing its specific elements—especially the intent to permanently deprive—and detailing its classification as a wobbler offense with substantial penalties will help inform and serve your clients effectively.
2. What Are Examples of Penal Code § 487d1 PC?
Under California Penal Code § 487(d)(1) PC, grand theft auto occurs when someone unlawfully takes another person’s motor vehicle with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of it. This intent to keep—or deprive the owner of—the vehicle is what separates grand theft auto from lesser offenses like joyriding.
Because the law applies broadly, grand theft auto can occur in many different ways, from traditional theft to more elaborate schemes. Below are some common examples.
1. Stealing a Parked Vehicle
A person walks through a parking garage, finds an unlocked vehicle, hotwires it, and drives away intending never to return it. Even if they later abandon the vehicle, the original intent to keep it permanently satisfies the requirements for grand theft auto.
2. Taking a Friend’s Car and Never Returning It
Borrowing a car without permission, and with the intent to keep it or sell it, qualifies as grand theft auto. For example, if someone takes a roommate’s car and drives it across state lines to sell, they can be charged under § 487(d)(1) PC.
3. Using Fraud to Obtain a Vehicle
Not all grand theft auto cases involve force. If a person poses as a legitimate buyer, writes a fraudulent check, or uses false identification to take possession of a car from a dealership, the deception still counts as “taking” under the law.
4. Carjacking That Includes Intent to Keep the Vehicle
While carjacking under PC § 215 is a separate and more serious offense, if the facts show the person intended to permanently keep the vehicle, they could face charges for both carjacking and grand theft auto.
5. Stealing a Rental Car
If someone rents a car with a valid agreement but decides not to return it—perhaps selling it or keeping it indefinitely—they may be charged with grand theft auto because the original intent shifted from temporary use to permanent deprivation.
6. Test-Drive Theft
A person visits a car dealership, asks to test drive a vehicle, and then drives off without returning it. Even though the dealership initially consented to the test drive, the intent to keep the vehicle permanently turns it into grand theft auto.
7. Taking a Vehicle from a Tow Yard or Repair Shop Without Paying
If a vehicle is held by a mechanic or towing company for unpaid fees, and someone removes it without settling the bill—while intending never to pay—they can be prosecuted under § 487(d)(1) PC.
3. What are Common Defenses Against Penal Code § 487d1 PC?
A charge under California Penal Code § 487(d)(1) PC—grand theft auto—can lead to serious consequences, including jail time, hefty fines, and a permanent criminal record. However, being accused of this offense does not automatically mean you will be convicted.
An experienced criminal defense attorney can evaluate the facts, challenge the prosecution’s evidence, and build strategies to fight the charges. Below are some of the most common defenses used in grand theft auto cases.
1. Lack of Intent to Permanently Deprive
Grand theft auto requires proof that the accused intended to permanently keep the vehicle or deprive the owner of its value. If the evidence shows the accused only intended temporary use—such as returning it later or using it for a short period—the offense may be reduced to joyriding under Vehicle Code § 10851 VC, which carries lighter penalties.
2. Owner’s Consent
If the owner gave permission to use the vehicle, it is not grand theft auto. Consent can be express (directly stated) or implied (based on the relationship or past behavior). For example, if the accused regularly borrowed the vehicle without objection from the owner, this may be a valid defense.
Vehicle theft cases often rely on witness statements, surveillance footage, or circumstantial evidence. Mistaken identification—especially in cases with poor lighting, low-quality video, or brief encounters—can lead to wrongful accusations.
Disputes between friends, family members, or business partners sometimes lead to false claims of vehicle theft. In these cases, the defense can present evidence such as text messages, emails, or prior agreements to prove the accusation is unfounded.
5. No Proof of “Taking”
To convict under § 487(d)(1) PC, the prosecution must show the defendant took or moved the vehicle, even slightly, without permission. If there is no proof that the accused physically took the car, the charge cannot stand.
6. Police Misconduct or Unlawful Search
If the vehicle was found through an illegal search and seizure—for example, if officers searched without a valid warrant or probable cause—the defense may file a motion to suppress the evidence. If granted, the case could be reduced or dismissed.
7. Honest Belief of Ownership or Right to Possession
If the accused genuinely believed they had a legal right to the vehicle—such as thinking it was theirs under a purchase agreement or loan arrangement—this “claim of right” defense can defeat the element of criminal intent.
our clients say it best
Client Testimonials
4. What are The Penalties for Violating Penal Code § 487d1 PC?
A conviction for California Penal Code § 487(d)(1) PC—grand theft auto—can have serious and lasting consequences. This offense is considered a “wobbler” under California law, meaning the prosecutor can charge it as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the facts of the case and the defendant’s criminal history.
The penalties vary significantly depending on how the offense is charged.
Misdemeanor Grand Theft Auto
If charged as a misdemeanor, the penalties may include:
County Jail: Up to 1 year
Fines: Up to $1,000
Probation: Possible summary (informal) probation
Restitution: Payment to the victim for losses related to the theft
Misdemeanor charges are more likely when the vehicle’s value is lower, the accused has no prior record, and the circumstances do not involve aggravating factors.
Felony Grand Theft Auto
If charged as a felony, the penalties may include:
State Prison: 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years
Fines: Up to $10,000
Formal Probation: With strict conditions, such as mandatory check-ins and travel restrictions
Restitution: Compensation to the vehicle’s rightful owner
Felony charges are common when the vehicle has high value, the accused has prior theft convictions, or the case involves aggravating circumstances such as multiple stolen vehicles.
Sentence Enhancements for High-Value Vehicles
California imposes additional prison time if the vehicle’s value exceeds certain thresholds:
Over $65,000: Additional 1 year in prison
Over $200,000: Additional 2 years in prison
These enhancements are added to the base sentence and can significantly increase the total time served.
Other Consequences of a Grand Theft Auto Conviction
In addition to jail or prison time, a conviction can have long-term effects, such as:
Permanent Criminal Record: Making it harder to find employment, housing, or professional licensing
Loss of Gun Rights: For felony convictions
Immigration Consequences: For non-citizens, a theft conviction may lead to deportation or denial of reentry to the U.S.
Impact on Driving Record: While grand theft auto is not a traffic offense, related charges or conduct could affect driving privileges
Possibility of Expungement
If the defendant successfully completes probation or their sentence, they may be eligible to have the conviction expunged under Penal Code § 1203.4 PC. Expungement can help reduce the impact of the conviction on employment and background checks, though it does not restore firearm rights lost due to a felony.
5. What Are the Related Offenses To Penal Code § 487d1 PC?
Several California laws are closely related to Penal Code § 487(d)(1) PC—grand theft auto. In some cases, prosecutors may file these charges in addition to, or instead of, grand theft auto, depending on the evidence and circumstances. Understanding these related offenses can help you see the bigger picture of potential legal exposure.
1. Joyriding – Vehicle Code § 10851 VC
Joyriding occurs when someone takes or drives another person’s vehicle without permission but without the intent to permanently deprive the owner of it. This offense is often charged when the accused planned to return the car or use it temporarily.
Key Difference: Grand theft auto requires intent to keep the vehicle permanently; joyriding does not.
Penalties: Misdemeanor or felony charges, with up to 3 years in custody for felony cases.
2. Carjacking – Penal Code § 215 PC
Carjacking involves taking a motor vehicle directly from someone’s immediate presence by force or fear.
Key Difference: Carjacking requires direct confrontation and use of force or threats, making it a more serious felony than grand theft auto.
Penalties: 3, 5, or 9 years in state prison, plus possible enhancements for use of a weapon or causing injury.
3. Petty Theft – Penal Code § 488 PC
Petty theft applies to taking property valued at $950 or less.
Key Difference: If the stolen vehicle’s value is $950 or less (rare but possible for very old or damaged vehicles), the charge may be petty theft rather than grand theft auto.
Penalties: Up to 6 months in county jail and/or fines up to $1,000.
4. Receiving Stolen Property – Penal Code § 496 PC
A person can be charged with receiving stolen property if they buy, receive, conceal, or sell a stolen vehicle, knowing it was stolen.
Key Difference: This applies to those who knowingly possess a stolen car but did not personally steal it.
Penalties: Wobbler offense—up to 1 year in county jail (misdemeanor) or up to 3 years in prison (felony).
5. Burglary – Penal Code § 459 PC
Auto burglary involves entering a locked vehicle with the intent to commit theft or any felony once inside.
Key Difference: Burglary focuses on the unlawful entry into a vehicle, while grand theft auto focuses on taking and keeping the vehicle itself.
Penalties: Up to 3 years in prison for felony auto burglary.
6. Possession of a Stolen Vehicle – Vehicle Code § 10851 VC / Penal Code § 496d PC
While similar to receiving stolen property, this specifically covers possessing a stolen vehicle with knowledge it was stolen.
Key Difference: This focuses on possession rather than the act of theft.
Penalties: Up to 3 years in state prison for felony convictions.
Protecting Your Rights, Defending Your Future
Get in touch with our lawyers today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help you. We are here to answer your questions and provide you with the support you need during this difficult time.
Client Satisfaction Is Priority
function myFunction() { document.getElementById("text").innerHTML = "Facing criminal charges can be overwhelming. It is our job to make the process as clear as possible and lessen the burden on you. Although achieving success is a team effort, we work for you and do not consider the job done until the results bring peace to you and your loved ones."; document.getElementById("btn").style.display = "none"; }
You Are More Than What They Say
function myFunction1() { document.getElementById("text1").innerHTML = "Human beings are much more than what the prosecution may accuse them of. The prosecution sees over 100 criminal defendants in a day. Our clients must stand out among the rest. To do that, our firm creates mitigation packets to give to the prosecutor and the court. Your version of events, our legal analysis, evidence that can support our defense, letters of character, community engagement, and much more is included in this mitigation packet. We have effectively changed the way the prosecution works with clients who come from Grace Legal Group."; document.getElementById("btn1").style.display = "none";}
We Always Go The Extra Mile
function myFunction11() { document.getElementById("text11").innerHTML = "The police are not perfect. So to combat this, our investigative team of former law enforcement examines and reviews every aspect of the case leaning on every ounce of their prior experience. This allows for a thorough analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. Legal Motions are regularly drafted and submitted throughout the process to hold both the police and the prosecutor accountable. The Constitution must be upheld in other courts."; document.getElementById("btn11").style.display = "none"; }