Penal Code § 182 PC - Conspiracy
1. What is Penal Code § 182 PC?
Penal Code § 182 PC Law Reads As Followed:
(a) If two or more persons conspire to commit any crime, and one or more of the parties to the conspiracy commits an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, then all persons involved in the conspiracy are guilty of the crime of conspiracy.
(b) Conspiracy is not a crime that is committed solely by agreement; it requires that at least one of the conspirators take an overt act toward accomplishing the criminal objective. The overt act does not have to be a criminal act, but it must be an act that demonstrates an intention to carry out the conspiracy.
2. What Are Examples of Penal Code § 182 PC?
Penal Code § 182 PC criminalizes conspiracy in California, making it illegal for two or more people to agree to commit a crime and for one or more of them to take an overt act in furtherance of that agreement. This charge applies even if the crime that was intended is not carried out. To help better understand this crime, here are several examples of conspiracies under Penal Code § 182 PC:
1. Conspiring to Commit a Burglary
Two individuals, Alex and Ben, agree to break into a home and steal valuable items. Alex goes to the hardware store and buys a crowbar, while Ben scouts out the house to see when the owners will be away. Even though they have not yet broken into the house, their agreement to commit the crime and the overt acts—purchasing tools and surveilling the location—are enough for a conspiracy charge under § 182 PC.
2. Conspiring to Rob a Bank
Sarah and Lisa plan to rob a bank. They discuss how they will approach the bank, divide the money, and avoid detection. To further the plan, Sarah buys ski masks and gloves for them to wear during the robbery, while Lisa rents a getaway car. The purchase of ski masks and the rental of the car qualify as overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy, which makes them both guilty of conspiracy to commit robbery, even if the robbery is never actually carried out.
3. Conspiring to Sell Illegal Drugs
John and Michael agree to sell drugs. John buys a large quantity of narcotics, while Michael sets up a meeting with a potential buyer. Even if they do not go through with the transaction, the agreement to sell illegal drugs and the overt act of purchasing drugs and setting up the meeting constitute conspiracy under Penal Code § 182 PC.
4. Conspiring to Commit Murder
Two individuals, Claire and Robert, agree to kill a mutual acquaintance. Claire purchases a firearm, and Robert begins to gather information on the target’s routine. These overt acts demonstrate that they took steps to further their plan, which makes them both liable for conspiracy to commit murder, even if the murder itself is never executed.
5. Conspiring to Commit Insurance Fraud
Amanda and Tom conspire to commit insurance fraud. Amanda arranges to set fire to her business for an insurance payout, and Tom provides her with an accelerant to help start the fire. Even if the fire is prevented, their actions (the agreement to commit fraud and the purchase of the accelerant) would be enough to charge them both with conspiracy under Penal Code § 182 PC.
6. Conspiring to Commit Identity Theft
A group of individuals agrees to steal personal information from unsuspecting victims in order to open credit accounts in their names. One person in the group, Jake, buys equipment to clone credit cards, while another, Lila, makes fake IDs. These overt acts, even though not leading to completed fraud, show that the group took active steps to carry out their plan.
7. Conspiring to Traffic Illegal Weapons
Three people agree to traffic firearms across state lines. To execute the plan, one person buys firearms, another arranges transport, and the third begins scouting out potential buyers. Even if the weapons are never sold, the agreement to engage in illegal activity and the actions taken to advance the conspiracy make all involved guilty of conspiracy under Penal Code § 182.
3. What are Common Defenses Against Penal Code § 182 PC?
A charge of conspiracy under California Penal Code § 182 PC can have serious consequences, as it involves an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime and one or more overt acts taken to further that agreement. However, a defendant accused of conspiracy can challenge the charge with several legal defenses. These defenses may focus on disproving the elements of the conspiracy or asserting that the defendant was not involved in the criminal agreement. Below are some common defenses against Penal Code § 182 PC charges.
1. No Agreement to Commit a Crime
For a conspiracy charge to be valid, there must be an actual agreement between two or more parties to commit a criminal act. If the prosecution cannot prove that there was an agreement, the defendant cannot be convicted of conspiracy. This is one of the most common defenses used in conspiracy cases.
Example: John and Mike are seen talking in a parking lot, but they never discuss committing any crime. They may have been talking about something unrelated, like sports or the weather. Without evidence of an agreement to commit a crime, no conspiracy charge should stand.
2. No Overt Act Was Committed
Another critical element of a conspiracy charge is the “overt act” in furtherance of the agreement. An overt act is an action taken after the conspiracy is formed that demonstrates an effort to carry out the criminal objective. If no overt act is committed, there cannot be a conviction for conspiracy under Penal Code § 182 PC.
Example: Two individuals may agree to rob a bank, but if neither takes any steps toward carrying out the plan—such as buying weapons or scoping out the bank—they cannot be convicted of conspiracy. The mere agreement, without any overt act, is insufficient.
3. Withdrawal from the Conspiracy
A defendant may avoid liability for conspiracy if they withdraw from the agreement before an overt act is committed. However, withdrawal must be communicated to the other parties in the conspiracy. A defendant can argue that they took steps to abandon the conspiracy and clearly communicated their withdrawal to others involved.
Example: Jane and Peter agree to steal a car. Before any action is taken, Jane decides she no longer wants to participate and tells Peter she is withdrawing from the plan. As long as Peter does not act on Jane’s involvement after she withdrew, Jane cannot be charged with conspiracy.
4. Lack of Intent to Commit a Crime
A common defense to a conspiracy charge is that the defendant did not have the intent to commit a crime. In cases where the defendant did not intend to carry out the illegal act, they can argue that they were simply present during discussions or were misled by other participants. If the prosecution cannot prove that the defendant had criminal intent, the conspiracy charge cannot stand.
Example: A person who attends a meeting with others but does not know that the discussion involves planning a crime might claim that they were unaware of the illegal objective. If they were not a willing participant in the conspiracy, they can defend against the charge.
5. Entrapment
Entrapment occurs when law enforcement or another authority induces someone to commit a crime they otherwise would not have committed. In conspiracy cases, a defendant may argue that they were coerced or manipulated into participating in the conspiracy by law enforcement agents. Entrapment can be used as a defense if the defendant can show that they were induced to join the conspiracy by law enforcement officers.
Example: An undercover officer may engage with a suspect and suggest that they participate in a criminal activity. If the defendant argues that they were coerced into joining the conspiracy by law enforcement, they may have a valid defense of entrapment.
6. Involuntary Participation
A defendant can argue that they were forced or coerced into participating in the conspiracy. In such cases, the defendant would assert that they did not agree to the criminal act willingly and were compelled by threats, force, or other external pressures. If the defendant can establish that their participation was involuntary, they may not be guilty of conspiracy.
Example: A person who is threatened with harm or blackmailed into taking part in a conspiracy can argue that their involvement was not voluntary and should not be grounds for a conviction.
7. No Knowledge of the Conspiracy
A person can also defend themselves against conspiracy charges by arguing that they were unaware of the criminal conspiracy. If they can demonstrate that they did not know that the other parties were planning to commit a crime, they may avoid conviction. This defense can be effective if the defendant was simply a bystander or had no knowledge of the criminal elements involved.
Example: A person may have been unknowingly part of a conversation or action that was later construed as part of a conspiracy. If they were unaware of the plan and did not knowingly agree to the crime, they can argue that they did not have the necessary knowledge to be guilty of conspiracy.
8. Co-Defendants Were Not Part of the Conspiracy
In some cases, a defendant may argue that the alleged co-conspirators were not actually part of the conspiracy. For example, the defendant might assert that they were only tangentially involved or did not agree to commit a crime with the other people involved. If the prosecution cannot establish that the other parties were part of a valid conspiracy, the defendant may be able to argue that there was no agreement.
Example: One individual may be accused of conspiring with a group of people, but they were not aware of or involved in the other parties’ actions. In such a case, the defendant could argue that they were not part of a criminal conspiracy.
our clients say it best
Client Testimonials
4. What are The Penalties for Violating Penal Code § 182 PC?
California Penal Code § 182 PC makes it a criminal offense to conspire with others to commit a crime. A conviction for conspiracy can have serious consequences, including substantial fines, imprisonment, and long-lasting impacts on one’s criminal record. The penalties for violating Penal Code § 182 PC vary based on several factors, such as the underlying offense that was the subject of the conspiracy and whether the charge is considered a felony or misdemeanor. Below is an overview of the potential penalties for violating Penal Code § 182 PC.
1. Felony vs. Misdemeanor Charges
The penalties for conspiracy under Penal Code § 182 PC depend on whether the underlying crime that was the subject of the conspiracy is classified as a felony or misdemeanor. Conspiracy is typically charged as a felony, but it may also be considered a wobbler offense, meaning it can be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on the circumstances.
Felony Charges
When conspiracy is charged as a felony, the penalties can be severe and often align with the penalties for the underlying offense that the defendant conspired to commit. For example, if the conspiracy was to commit a robbery (a felony), the defendant could face penalties consistent with a robbery conviction, which could include significant prison time.
For example, if a defendant conspires to commit a felony like grand theft or assault with a deadly weapon, the potential punishment will depend on the severity of the crime they were conspiring to commit.
Misdemeanor Charges
In some cases, conspiracy may be charged as a misdemeanor. This can happen when the underlying offense is considered a misdemeanor or when the prosecutor has discretion to reduce the charge. If conspiracy is charged as a misdemeanor, the penalties are typically less severe than those for a felony.
A misdemeanor conviction for conspiracy under Penal Code § 182 PC can result in:
Up to 1 year in county jail, or
Substantial fines (usually up to $1,000), or both.
However, keep in mind that even misdemeanor conspiracy charges can lead to long-term consequences, such as a criminal record that can affect employment and other areas of life.
2. Penalties Based on the Underlying Offense
The penalties for conspiracy under Penal Code § 182 PC are heavily influenced by the crime that the defendant conspired to commit. The punishment for the conspiracy charge is typically the same as or directly related to the punishment for the underlying offense. For example:
Conspiracy to Commit Theft: If a person conspires to commit theft, they could face the penalties for theft, which might include jail time, restitution to the victim, and fines.
Conspiracy to Commit Murder: If the conspiracy involves a violent crime like murder, the penalties can be life imprisonment or even the death penalty, depending on the severity of the crime.
Conspiracy to Commit Drug Trafficking: For a conspiracy to commit drug trafficking, the penalties may involve significant prison sentences, with the length of time dependent on the specific drugs involved and the quantity.
3. Penalties for Conspiracy to Commit Multiple Felonies
If a person conspires to commit more than one felony, the penalties are typically focused on the crime with the most severe punishment. The defendant could face the highest potential penalty for the felony they were conspiring to commit, which may increase their time in prison.
For example, if a defendant conspired to commit both burglary and murder, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit murder and face the more severe penalties associated with that offense.
4. Mandatory Sentences for Certain Crimes
Some crimes carry mandatory minimum sentences, even when the crime involves a conspiracy. For example:
Gang-related Conspiracy: If the conspiracy involves committing a crime for the benefit of a gang (Penal Code § 186.22), the defendant may face mandatory prison sentences that run consecutively to the penalties for the underlying felony. This could result in significantly increased prison time.
Drug-Related Conspiracies: Conspiring to commit a drug crime could involve mandatory minimum sentences, especially if the conspiracy involves large quantities of controlled substances.
5. Potential Additional Penalties
In addition to jail or prison time, a conviction for conspiracy under Penal Code § 182 PC may result in the following additional penalties:
Fines: Fines can be substantial, often ranging from hundreds to thousands of dollars, depending on the nature of the crime.
Restitution: The court may order the defendant to pay restitution to the victim of the underlying crime, especially if the crime involved financial harm or property damage.
Probation: Instead of or in addition to jail time, the court may impose probation, which may require the defendant to adhere to specific conditions, such as regular check-ins with a probation officer, community service, or attending counseling programs.
Loss of Civil Rights: A felony conviction for conspiracy may result in the loss of certain civil rights, such as the right to vote or possess firearms.
6. Immigration Consequences
Non-citizens who are convicted of conspiracy may face immigration consequences, including deportation or inadmissibility. If a conspiracy conviction involves a crime of moral turpitude or an aggravated felony, the defendant could be deported or denied entry to the United States. It is important for non-citizens to understand these potential consequences when facing conspiracy charges.
7. Expungement and Record Sealing
Under California law, individuals convicted of conspiracy under Penal Code § 182 PC may be eligible to have their records expunged or sealed after completing probation or a jail sentence. Expungement can help remove the legal and social consequences of a conviction, but eligibility depends on the specific circumstances of the case. It is important to consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney to determine if expungement is possible.
5. What Are the Related Offenses To Penal Code § 182 PC?
California Penal Code § 182 PC criminalizes conspiracy, which occurs when two or more people agree to commit a crime, and at least one party performs an overt act to advance the conspiracy. While conspiracy itself is a serious crime, there are several related offenses that can be tied to this charge, each carrying its own legal implications and potential penalties. These related offenses can stem from the criminal conduct associated with a conspiracy or from actions that assist in the commission of a conspiracy.
Here are some of the key related offenses to Penal Code § 182 PC:
1. Aiding and Abetting – Penal Code § 31
Under Penal Code § 31 PC, aiding and abetting refers to encouraging, assisting, or facilitating the commission of a crime. A person who aids and abets a crime may be charged with the same crime as the principal perpetrator, even if they did not directly commit the criminal act.
In the context of conspiracy, a defendant can be charged with aiding and abetting if they helped one of the conspirators carry out an overt act to further the conspiracy, even if they did not agree to the criminal plan themselves. For example, if a person knowingly provides tools or resources to one of the conspirators without being part of the conspiracy agreement, they can be charged under this statute.
2. Accessory After the Fact – Penal Code § 32
An accessory after the fact refers to someone who helps a criminal defendant avoid arrest, prosecution, or conviction after the commission of a crime. This can include actions such as hiding a conspirator, providing them with money to flee, or destroying evidence.
Under Penal Code § 32 PC, an accessory after the fact may face criminal charges for helping the conspirator escape justice. This offense is distinct from conspiracy itself, as it occurs after the conspiracy has been carried out and may involve different legal elements.
For instance, if a group of conspirators successfully commits a crime and one member helps the others evade law enforcement, that individual could be charged with being an accessory after the fact.
Under Penal Code § 664 PC, attempt refers to a person taking a direct step toward committing a crime but failing to complete it. Attempt charges are often linked to conspiracy charges because, in many cases, an overt act within the conspiracy is seen as an attempt to commit the underlying crime.
For example, if two people conspire to commit burglary, and one of them purchases tools (e.g., crowbars) to break into a building, that act can be considered an attempt to commit the burglary. While the burglary itself may not be completed, the overt act is still sufficient to charge an individual with conspiracy to commit the crime, and the attempt may carry its own penalties.
4. Gang Sentencing Enhancement – Penal Code § 186.22
Under Penal Code § 186.22, a gang sentencing enhancement may be applied if a conspiracy is committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang. This sentencing enhancement adds a mandatory prison term to the defendant’s sentence, often significantly increasing the length of imprisonment.
If a conspiracy involves a gang, the defendant could face not only the penalties for conspiracy itself but also additional time behind bars for the gang-related enhancement. This is particularly true if the conspiracy was committed to further the gang’s illegal activities, such as drug trafficking, robbery, or violent crimes.
5. Solicitation – Penal Code § 653f
Solicitation refers to encouraging, requesting, or commanding someone to commit a crime. Under Penal Code § 653f, a person who solicits another to commit a crime can be charged with solicitation, even if the person they solicited does not agree to commit the crime.
Although solicitation is distinct from conspiracy, the two offenses are closely related because both involve an agreement to commit a crime. The key difference is that, in conspiracy, at least one person must take an overt act to further the crime, whereas in solicitation, the crime may be initiated simply through verbal encouragement or a request.
6. Criminal Association – Penal Code § 11300
California Penal Code § 11300 prohibits certain activities related to criminal associations, such as forming or being part of a group that conspires to commit crimes. While the statute does not specifically address conspiracy, it prohibits the formation of groups intending to commit illegal acts.
This law is often related to conspiracy because individuals involved in criminal organizations or gangs may be implicated in larger conspiracy schemes. In these cases, the individuals may face criminal charges under both Penal Code § 11300 and § 182 PC.
7. Money Laundering – Penal Code § 186.10
Money laundering is the process of concealing the origins of illegally obtained money, often as a result of criminal activities such as conspiracy, drug trafficking, or organized crime. Under Penal Code § 186.10, it is illegal to engage in money laundering or to assist others in laundering money gained from criminal activity.
If a conspiracy involves illegal financial activity, such as drug trafficking or fraud, participants may also face money laundering charges, adding additional penalties to the conspiracy charges.
8. Fraud – Penal Code § 487
Fraud is a broad term that encompasses a variety of deceptive practices intended to gain an unfair advantage, often through misrepresentation, false claims, or deception. Fraud-related crimes can be closely tied to conspiracy, especially in cases involving financial schemes, insurance fraud, or identity theft.
Under Penal Code § 487, fraud can be charged as a felony, and a person involved in a fraudulent scheme may also be charged with conspiracy if they agree with others to carry out fraudulent activities.
Protecting Your Rights, Defending Your Future
Get in touch with our lawyers today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help you. We are here to answer your questions and provide you with the support you need during this difficult time.
Client Satisfaction Is Priority
You Are More Than What They Say
We Always Go The Extra Mile