Penal Code § 601 PC - Aggravated Trespass

Table of contents

Click To travel To Chapters

1. What is the “Aggravated Trespass”?

Penal Code 601 PC in California defines the crime of “aggravated trespass.” This statute specifically targets individuals who threaten to cause serious bodily injury to another person and, within 30 days of making that threat, unlawfully enter the threatened person’s home or workplace with the intent to execute the threat. Aggravated trespass is considered a more severe offense than simple trespass due to its element of intent to harm and its connection to credible threats of violence.

Penal Code 601 PC aims to deter and punish individuals who threaten violence and then take steps to follow through on that threat by unlawfully entering the victim’s property. The law protects individuals from both physical harm and the fear of potential harm. If you are facing charges under Penal Code 601 PC, it is essential to understand your rights and legal options.

At Grace Legal Group, our experienced criminal defense attorneys are here to help you navigate the complexities of California law, protect your rights, and build a strong defense. Contact us today for a consultation to discuss your case and explore your legal options.

Penal Code § 601 PC Law Reads As Followed:

601. Any person is guilty of trespass who makes a credible threat to cause serious bodily injury…to another person with the intent to place that other person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family…and who does any of the following:

Within 30 days of the threat, unlawfully enters into the residence or real property contiguous to the residence of the person threatened without lawful purpose, and with the intent to execute the threat against the target of the threat.

Within 30 days of the threat, knowing that the place is the threatened person’s workplace, unlawfully enters into the workplace of the person threatened and carries out an act or acts to locate the threatened person within the workplace premises without lawful purpose, and with the intent to execute the threat against the target of the threat.

2. What Are Examples of Penal Code § 601 PC?

Penal Code § 601 PC in California addresses the crime of aggravated trespass, which occurs when someone makes a credible threat to cause serious bodily injury and, within 30 days of making that threat, unlawfully enters the threatened person’s home or workplace with the intent to carry out the threat. This offense is more serious than simple trespass due to its violent nature and intent to harm. To better understand what constitutes aggravated trespass under Penal Code § 601 PC, let’s explore several examples that illustrate different scenarios where this law applies.

Example 1: Entering a Home After Threatening Violence

Scenario: David, upset over a business dispute, sends a text message to his former partner, Lisa, saying, “I’m going to break your legs the next time I see you.” Two weeks later, David is found inside Lisa’s garage without her permission, holding a crowbar.
Analysis: This situation qualifies as aggravated trespass under Penal Code § 601 PC. David made a credible threat to cause serious bodily injury, and then, within 30 days, unlawfully entered Lisa’s property with a potential weapon and the intent to carry out his threat.

Example 2: Threatening a Neighbor and Trespassing

Scenario: Julie is angry at her neighbor, Sam, for hosting loud parties. She shouts at Sam over the fence, “I’m going to make you pay for this!” A few days later, Julie sneaks into Sam’s backyard at night and starts banging on his back door.
Analysis: Julie’s actions constitute aggravated trespass. Her verbal threat could be seen as a credible threat of harm, and her subsequent unauthorized entry into Sam’s backyard within 30 days shows an intent to confront or possibly harm Sam, fulfilling the criteria under Penal Code § 601 PC.

Example 3: Entering a Workplace After Making a Threat

Scenario: After a heated argument with her coworker, Maria tells him, “You’ll regret this, mark my words.” The following week, Maria enters the coworker’s office building after hours without authorization and attempts to locate him in his office.
Analysis: This is a clear case of aggravated trespass. Maria’s threat could be perceived as a credible threat, and her unauthorized entry into the coworker’s workplace within 30 days indicates intent to confront or harm, which satisfies the elements required under Penal Code § 601 PC.

Example 4: Breaking Into a Former Partner’s Residence

Scenario: After a contentious breakup, Tom tells his ex-girlfriend, Kate, “I’ll hurt you if you try to leave me.” Three weeks later, Tom is caught breaking into Kate’s apartment while she is not home.
Analysis: Tom’s behavior meets the criteria for aggravated trespass under Penal Code § 601 PC. His threat was explicit and credible, and his subsequent unlawful entry into Kate’s apartment demonstrates an intent to carry out his threat.

Example 5: Trespassing with Intent to Harm a Family Member

Scenario: Mark sends a threatening email to his brother-in-law, Joe, stating, “You’re going to pay for what you did to my sister.” A week later, Mark is found inside Joe’s house without permission, carrying a weapon.
Analysis: Mark’s actions constitute aggravated trespass. The threat was specific and credible, and his unlawful entry into Joe’s home, combined with carrying a weapon, indicates his intent to execute the threat.

Example 6: Following Through on a Threat at a Workplace

Scenario: Karen, angry over a promotion she didn’t receive, tells her manager, “You’ll regret this decision.” Two days later, Karen enters the manager’s office building without permission and waits outside his office with a threatening demeanor.
Analysis: This is an example of aggravated trespass under Penal Code § 601 PC. Karen’s threat and her unauthorized entry into the manager’s workplace within a short period indicate her intent to intimidate or harm, which is enough to satisfy the elements of the offense.

These examples demonstrate the various ways someone can violate Penal Code § 601 PC in California. The common elements across all these scenarios include:

Credible Threat: The person made a believable threat of serious bodily injury that would cause the victim reasonable fear for their safety.
Unlawful Entry: The person entered the victim’s home or workplace without permission.
Intent to Execute the Threat: The entry was made with the intent to carry out the threat or confront the victim.

Understanding these examples can help clarify what constitutes aggravated trespass and how serious the consequences can be. If you are charged with aggravated trespass under Penal Code § 601 PC, it is vital to seek experienced legal counsel to explore your options for defense.

At Grace Legal Group, we specialize in defending clients against aggravated trespass charges and other criminal offenses. Our skilled attorneys are here to help you navigate the legal system, protect your rights, and build a strong defense. Contact us today for a consultation to discuss your case and explore your legal options.

3. What Are Common Defenses Against Penal Code § 601 PC?

Penal Code § 601 PC in California criminalizes “aggravated trespass,” which involves making a credible threat to cause serious bodily injury to someone and, within 30 days, unlawfully entering that person’s home or workplace with the intent to carry out the threat. While this is a serious offense with significant penalties, there are several defenses that can be effectively employed to challenge such charges. Understanding these defenses is crucial for anyone facing allegations under Penal Code § 601 PC. Here are some of the most common defenses against aggravated trespass:

1. No Credible Threat

Defense Argument: The defendant did not make a credible threat to cause serious bodily injury.
Explanation: A credible threat must be one that would reasonably cause the alleged victim to fear for their safety or the safety of their immediate family, and it must be a threat that the defendant appears capable of carrying out. If the threat was vague, non-specific, or made in a joking or sarcastic manner, it might not meet the legal definition of a credible threat.
Example: If someone casually mentions in a light-hearted context, “I’ll get you back someday,” this could be argued as not being a credible threat since it lacks specificity and seriousness.

2. No Intent to Cause Fear

Defense Argument: The defendant did not intend to cause fear in the alleged victim.
Explanation: The prosecution must prove that the defendant made the threat with the specific intent to place the victim in reasonable fear for their safety. If the defendant can demonstrate that they had no such intent, this defense can be effective.
Example: If the defendant made a statement out of frustration but did not mean to frighten the person, and the context shows no real intent to scare, this could negate the necessary intent to cause fear.

3. No Unlawful Entry

Defense Argument: The defendant did not unlawfully enter the home or workplace of the alleged victim.
Explanation: For a charge under Penal Code § 601 PC, the entry must be unauthorized and done without a lawful purpose. If the defendant had permission to enter or if there was no actual entry into the home or workplace, this element of the offense is not met.
Example: If a person enters a property to return something or because they were invited and then asked to leave, this could be argued as a lawful entry.

4. No Intent to Carry Out the Threat

Defense Argument: The defendant did not have the intent to carry out the threat when they entered the property.
Explanation: Even if the defendant entered the property, they must have done so with the intent to execute the threat for the charge of aggravated trespass to stand. If the entry was for a different purpose, such as to apologize or discuss an unrelated matter, this could be a valid defense.
Example: If the defendant went to the alleged victim’s workplace to apologize or to collect personal belongings, and not with the intent to harm or intimidate, this defense could be used.

5. Lack of Evidence

Defense Argument: The prosecution lacks sufficient evidence to prove all the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Explanation: The burden of proof lies with the prosecution to establish every element of aggravated trespass. If there is insufficient evidence, or if the evidence is based on unreliable testimony or circumstantial evidence, the defense can argue that the charges should be dismissed.
Example: If the only evidence of a threat is a vague statement with no witnesses or corroboration, the defense could argue that this is insufficient to prove a credible threat or intent.

6. Duress or Coercion

Defense Argument: The defendant acted under duress or coercion and did not willingly commit the act of trespass.
Explanation: If the defendant was forced or threatened by another person to commit the trespass, this could serve as a defense. The law recognizes that actions taken under extreme pressure or threats lack the voluntary component required for criminal liability.
Example: If someone was threatened with harm unless they went to the victim’s home, this could be used as a defense under duress.

7. Mistaken Identity

Defense Argument: The defendant was mistakenly identified as the person who made the threat or committed the trespass.
Explanation: In some cases, the wrong person may be accused due to mistaken identity. If the defendant can prove they were not present at the scene or that someone else committed the act, this could be a strong defense.
Example: Providing an alibi or evidence that places the defendant elsewhere at the time of the alleged crime can help establish mistaken identity.

Being charged with aggravated trespass under Penal Code § 601 PC is a serious matter, but several defenses can be used to fight these charges. No credible threat, no intent to cause fear, no unlawful entry, no intent to carry out the threat, lack of evidence, duress, and mistaken identity are all viable defenses that can potentially lead to a reduction or dismissal of charges.

At Grace Legal Group, we are committed to providing comprehensive defense strategies tailored to each client’s unique situation. Our experienced criminal defense attorneys understand the intricacies of California law and are dedicated to protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome for your case. If you are facing charges under Penal Code § 601 PC, contact us today for a consultation to discuss your legal options.

our clients say it best

Client Testimonials

4. What Are The Penalties for Violating Penal Code § 601 PC?

Penal Code § 601 PC in California defines the crime of “aggravated trespass,” which occurs when an individual makes a credible threat to cause serious bodily injury and, within 30 days of making that threat, unlawfully enters the threatened person’s home or workplace with the intent to carry out the threat. This offense is considered more serious than simple trespass due to its elements of threat and potential violence. Understanding the penalties associated with a conviction under Penal Code § 601 PC is crucial for anyone facing such charges or seeking to understand the legal consequences. Here’s a detailed look at the potential penalties for violating Penal Code § 601 PC.

Classification of the Offense

Penal Code § 601 PC is classified as a “wobbler” offense in California. This means that it can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the specific circumstances of the case and the defendant’s criminal history. The prosecutor’s decision to charge the offense as a misdemeanor or felony will depend on factors such as the severity of the threat, the nature of the entry, and any prior criminal record.

Misdemeanor Penalties

If aggravated trespass is charged as a misdemeanor, the potential penalties include:

Imprisonment: Up to one year in county jail.
Fines: A fine of up to $2,000.
Misdemeanor Probation: Also known as summary or informal probation, this may include conditions such as community service, counseling, mandatory check-ins with a probation officer, or other court-mandated requirements.

Felony Penalties

If aggravated trespass is charged as a felony, the penalties are more severe and can include:

Imprisonment: Up to three years in county jail.
Fines: A fine of up to $10,000.
Felony Probation: Also known as formal probation, this may require regular meetings with a probation officer, adherence to strict conditions, completion of community service, mandatory counseling or treatment programs, and potential restrictions on travel or association.

Additional Consequences

In addition to the direct penalties of imprisonment, fines, and probation, a conviction for aggravated trespass under Penal Code § 601 PC can have several collateral consequences:

Criminal Record: A conviction will result in a permanent criminal record, which can affect employment opportunities, professional licenses, housing applications, and other aspects of daily life.
Immigration Consequences: For non-citizens, a conviction for aggravated trespass, especially if charged as a felony, could result in serious immigration consequences, including deportation or inadmissibility to the United States. This is particularly relevant if the offense is considered a crime involving moral turpitude or an aggravated felony under federal immigration laws.
Effect on Gun Rights: A felony conviction under Penal Code § 601 PC will result in the loss of the right to own, possess, or purchase firearms in California. Even a misdemeanor conviction can affect gun rights, depending on the circumstances of the offense and the defendant’s criminal history.

Expungement Eligibility

Individuals convicted of aggravated trespass may be eligible for expungement of their records under Penal Code § 1203.4, provided they have successfully completed probation or served their sentence and are not currently facing any other criminal charges. An expungement releases the defendant from many of the consequences of a conviction, such as having to disclose the conviction to potential employers. However, it does not restore firearm rights or affect immigration consequences.

Eligibility for Expungement:
- Successful completion of probation or sentence.
- No pending criminal charges, current probation, or ongoing criminal sentences.

Expungement provides significant benefits, including removing some barriers to employment and housing, and providing a fresh start in certain aspects of life.

Violating Penal Code § 601 PC by committing aggravated trespass carries significant penalties, which can profoundly impact a person’s life. The classification of the offense as a misdemeanor or a felony greatly influences the severity of the penalties, including potential imprisonment, fines, and probation. Additionally, a conviction can have serious collateral consequences, such as impacts on immigration status, firearm rights, and one’s ability to find employment or housing.

At Grace Legal Group, we understand the serious nature of aggravated trespass charges and are committed to providing robust defense strategies tailored to your unique situation. If you or someone you know is facing charges under Penal Code § 601 PC, contact us today for a consultation to discuss your legal options and ensure your rights are protected.

5. What Are The Related Offenses To Penal Code § 601 PC?

Penal Code § 601 PC in California addresses the crime of aggravated trespass, which involves making a credible threat to cause serious bodily injury and, within 30 days of making that threat, unlawfully entering the threatened person’s home or workplace with the intent to execute the threat. While this statute focuses on the intersection of trespass and threats of violence, there are several related offenses in California law that also deal with similar actions or elements of criminal behavior. Understanding these related offenses can provide a broader perspective on the legal landscape surrounding aggravated trespass. Here are some of the key related offenses:

1. Penal Code § 602 PC – Trespass

Definition: Penal Code § 602 PC defines the crime of simple trespass, which involves entering or remaining on someone else’s property without permission or a legal right to do so.
Relation to Aggravated Trespass: While simple trespass under Penal Code § 602 does not require a credible threat or intent to cause harm, it is often considered a less serious offense compared to aggravated trespass. Aggravated trespass involves additional elements of intent and threat, making it more severe.
Penalties: Trespass under Penal Code § 602 PC is typically charged as a misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in county jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000.

2. Penal Code § 459 PC – Burglary

Definition: Penal Code § 459 PC defines burglary as entering any residential or commercial building or locked vehicle with the intent to commit theft or any felony once inside.
Relation to Aggravated Trespass: Both burglary and aggravated trespass involve unlawful entry into a property. However, burglary specifically requires the intent to commit theft or a felony inside the building, whereas aggravated trespass focuses on entering with the intent to carry out a threat of serious bodily harm.
Penalties: Burglary is divided into two degrees:
- First-Degree Burglary (Residential): Always a felony, punishable by up to six years in state prison.
- Second-Degree Burglary (Commercial): Can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony (“wobbler”), with felony convictions carrying up to three years in county jail.

3. Penal Code § 422 PC – Criminal Threats

Definition: Penal Code § 422 PC defines the crime of making criminal threats, which involves threatening to kill or physically harm someone, causing them to reasonably fear for their safety or the safety of their immediate family.
Relation to Aggravated Trespass: Aggravated trespass under Penal Code § 601 PC requires a credible threat of violence as a precursor to the unlawful entry. Similarly, Penal Code § 422 PC focuses on the act of making a criminal threat that causes fear. Both offenses involve threats but differ in the subsequent actions (entry vs. just the threat).
Penalties: Criminal threats are a “wobbler” offense and can be charged as a misdemeanor or felony. Felony convictions can result in up to three years in state prison.

4. Penal Code § 243(d) PC – Battery Causing Serious Bodily Injury

Definition: Penal Code § 243(d) PC deals with battery that results in serious bodily injury to another person.
Relation to Aggravated Trespass: Aggravated trespass could escalate to battery if the person unlawfully enters a property with the intent to carry out a threat and then physically attacks the victim, causing injury. This progression from trespass to physical violence links these two offenses.
Penalties: Battery causing serious bodily injury is a “wobbler” offense, with felony convictions carrying up to four years in state prison.

5. Penal Code § 273.5 PC – Domestic Violence

Definition: Penal Code § 273.5 PC makes it a crime to willfully inflict corporal injury on a spouse, cohabitant, or the parent of one’s child, resulting in a traumatic condition.
Relation to Aggravated Trespass: In cases where the victim of aggravated trespass is a domestic partner, spouse, or cohabitant, and the offense involves physical harm, the act may also qualify as domestic violence. The presence of a credible threat and unlawful entry could enhance the severity of the domestic violence charge.
Penalties: Domestic violence under Penal Code § 273.5 is a “wobbler” offense, with felony convictions resulting in up to four years in state prison.

6. Penal Code § 646.9 PC – Stalking

Definition: Penal Code § 646.9 PC defines stalking as willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly following or harassing another person and making a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for their safety.
Relation to Aggravated Trespass: Aggravated trespass could be part of a broader pattern of stalking behavior. For instance, repeated threats and unlawful entries into a victim’s home or workplace could constitute stalking if they cause ongoing fear and distress.
Penalties: Stalking is a “wobbler” offense, with felony convictions resulting in up to five years in state prison, especially if there are prior stalking convictions or if the victim has a restraining order against the defendant.

Penal Code § 601 PC is closely related to several other California statutes that address crimes involving threats, unlawful entry, violence, and harassment. Understanding these related offenses—such as trespass, burglary, criminal threats, battery, domestic violence, and stalking—can provide a more comprehensive view of the potential legal ramifications and interconnections between various criminal acts.

At Grace Legal Group, our experienced attorneys are well-versed in defending against a wide range of criminal charges, including aggravated trespass and related offenses. If you or someone you know is facing charges under Penal Code § 601 PC or any related statutes, contact us today for a consultation to discuss your legal options and develop a strong defense strategy.

Protecting Your Rights, Defending Your Future

Get in touch with our lawyers today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help you. We are here to answer your questions and provide you with the support you need during this difficult time.

Client Satisfaction Is Priority

You Are More Than What They Say

We Always Go The Extra Mile

Get A Free Consult

818.650.1744

@Gracelegalgroup