Penal Code § 666.5 PC – Auto Theft with a Prior
Table of contents
Click To travel To Chapters
1. What is Penal Code § 666.5 PC?
Penal Code § 666.5 PC Law Reads As Followed:
Every person who, having been previously convicted of a felony violation of Section 10851 of the Vehicle Code, or a felony violation of Section 487 or 496d of the Penal Code, or Section 10801 of the Vehicle Code, or of a felony violation of subdivision (a) of Section 459 of the Penal Code, is subsequently convicted of any of these offenses shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years, or a fine of up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or both that imprisonment and fine.
2. What are Examples of Penal Code § 666.5 PC?
3. What are Common Defenses Against Penal Code § 666.5 PC?
Being charged under Penal Code § 666.5 PC – Auto Theft with a Prior – can lead to serious consequences, including enhanced penalties such as longer prison sentences and higher fines. However, just because someone is charged doesn’t mean they are automatically guilty. Several legal defenses can be used to fight these charges, potentially reducing the penalties or getting the case dismissed altogether. Below are some of the most common defenses used against Penal Code § 666.5 PC charges.
1. The Prior Conviction Was Not for a Qualifying Offense
One of the key elements of Penal Code § 666.5 PC is that the defendant must have a prior conviction for auto theft or a related crime, such as:
Grand Theft Auto (Penal Code § 487(d)(1) PC)
Joyriding (Vehicle Code § 10851 VC)
Receiving a Stolen Vehicle (Penal Code § 496d PC)
Operating a Chop Shop (Vehicle Code § 10801 VC)
Auto Burglary (Penal Code § 459 PC)
If the prior conviction was not for one of these specific offenses, the sentencing enhancement under Penal Code § 666.5 does not apply. This can be an effective defense if the defendant’s previous conviction was for a different crime.
Example: A defendant’s prior conviction was for petty theft, not grand theft auto. Penal Code § 666.5 would not apply in this case, and the current auto theft charge may not carry enhanced penalties.
2. The Prior Conviction Was Expunged or Sealed
If the defendant’s previous auto theft conviction was expunged or sealed, it may no longer be valid for the purpose of imposing sentencing enhancements under Penal Code § 666.5. Expungement is a process where a prior conviction is essentially wiped from the defendant’s record, while sealed records are not accessible to the public.
Example: A defendant was convicted of grand theft auto in 2015, but the conviction was expunged in 2020. In 2023, they are charged with another auto theft offense. Their attorney can argue that Penal Code § 666.5 should not apply because the prior conviction has been expunged.
3. The Defendant Did Not Commit the Current Auto Theft
A common defense to the current auto theft charge is that the defendant did not actually commit the crime. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant unlawfully took or possessed someone else’s vehicle. If the evidence is insufficient, the charges may be dismissed or reduced.
Example: The defendant was falsely accused of stealing a car that they were authorized to drive. They have documentation showing that the vehicle’s owner consented to the use of the car. In this case, the defendant cannot be convicted of auto theft, and Penal Code § 666.5 would not apply.
4. Lack of Intent
To be convicted of auto theft, the prosecution must prove that the defendant intended to permanently or temporarily deprive the owner of their vehicle. If the defendant did not have this intent, they cannot be found guilty of auto theft. This defense can also be used against Penal Code § 666.5 PC charges.
Example: The defendant took a car believing they had the owner’s permission, or they believed the car was theirs. Since there was no intent to steal the vehicle, they may have a valid defense against the auto theft charge.
5. Mistaken Identity
In some cases, the defendant may be misidentified as the person who stole the vehicle. This could happen due to unreliable eyewitness testimony or circumstantial evidence. If the defendant can show that they were wrongly identified as the person who committed the crime, this can be a strong defense.
Example: The defendant was accused of stealing a car based on a witness description, but security footage later shows that someone else took the vehicle. The defense can argue that the defendant is a victim of mistaken identity, leading to the dismissal of the charges.
6. No Knowledge the Vehicle Was Stolen
Another common defense is that the defendant was unaware that the vehicle in question was stolen. This defense is especially useful in cases where the defendant is charged with receiving or purchasing a stolen vehicle under Penal Code § 496d PC.
Example: The defendant bought a used car from a private seller, not knowing it was stolen. If the defendant can show that they had no knowledge of the car’s stolen status, they may avoid a conviction for auto theft, and Penal Code § 666.5 would not apply.
7. Lack of Evidence for the Prior Conviction
If the prosecution cannot prove that the defendant has a valid prior conviction for auto theft or a related crime, Penal Code § 666.5 does not apply. In some cases, records of the prior conviction may be incomplete or unavailable.
Example: The prosecution alleges that the defendant has a prior conviction for grand theft auto, but they cannot produce the necessary documentation to prove it. Without this evidence, the court cannot impose the enhanced penalties under Penal Code § 666.5.
8. The Prior Offense Was Not a Felony
Penal Code § 666.5 applies only if the prior auto theft-related offense was a felony. If the prior conviction was a misdemeanor, the sentencing enhancement under Penal Code § 666.5 cannot be imposed.
Example: The defendant’s prior joyriding conviction was classified as a misdemeanor, not a felony. Since Penal Code § 666.5 only applies to felony convictions, the enhanced penalties do not apply in this case.
our clients say it best
Client Testimonials
4. What are The Penalties for Violating Penal Code § 666.5 PC?
Penal Code § 666.5 PC is a California law that imposes harsher penalties on repeat offenders who are convicted of auto theft or related crimes. If someone with a prior conviction for an auto theft-related offense is charged again, they face more severe consequences than they would for a first-time offense. The penalties under Penal Code § 666.5 PC can include lengthy prison sentences, hefty fines, and other long-term consequences.
Here, we break down the penalties for violating Penal Code § 666.5 PC and what you can expect if convicted under this law.
1. Prison Sentence
One of the most significant penalties for violating Penal Code § 666.5 PC is a prison sentence. Unlike some first-time auto theft offenses, which may be charged as misdemeanors, a violation of Penal Code § 666.5 PC is always a felony. This means that a convicted defendant will face state prison time.
Sentence Length: A conviction under Penal Code § 666.5 PC can result in a prison sentence of 2, 3, or 4 years in state prison. The specific length of the sentence depends on several factors, including the circumstances of the crime, the defendant’s criminal history, and any aggravating or mitigating factors in the case.
Example: If someone with a prior conviction for grand theft auto is convicted again under Penal Code § 666.5, they could face up to 4 years in state prison, even if the new offense would have been a misdemeanor without the prior conviction.
2. Fines
In addition to prison time, defendants convicted under Penal Code § 666.5 PC may face substantial fines. The fines for a violation of this law can be as high as $10,000.
Fines in Combination with Prison Time: It’s important to note that the court can impose both prison time and fines, meaning that a defendant could face years in prison and still be ordered to pay significant financial penalties.
Example: A defendant who is convicted under Penal Code § 666.5 may be sentenced to 3 years in state prison and fined $5,000, depending on the details of the case.
3. Probation
In some cases, a judge may choose to impose probation instead of, or in addition to, a prison sentence. This option is typically reserved for cases where the defendant has mitigating factors or the crime was less severe. Probation can come with strict conditions, and failure to follow these conditions can lead to additional penalties.
Conditions of Probation: If probation is granted, the defendant may be required to follow specific rules, such as regularly reporting to a probation officer, paying restitution to the victim, attending counseling, or performing community service. Probation can last for several years, and any violation can result in the defendant being sent to prison.
Example: A defendant convicted of auto theft under Penal Code § 666.5 may receive probation instead of the maximum prison sentence. However, if they violate the terms of their probation, such as failing to appear for required meetings, they could be sent to prison for the full term.
4. Restitution to Victims
Defendants convicted of auto theft, especially under Penal Code § 666.5 PC, may also be ordered to pay restitution to the victims. Restitution is meant to cover any financial losses suffered by the victim, such as the cost of the stolen or damaged vehicle.
Restitution Amounts: The court will determine the amount of restitution based on the victim’s losses, which can include the cost of repairs, replacement of the stolen vehicle, or any other financial harm the victim experienced as a result of the theft.
Example: If a defendant stole a car worth $10,000 and caused $2,000 worth of damage, they could be ordered to pay $12,000 in restitution in addition to other fines and penalties.
5. Other Consequences
Beyond the immediate penalties of prison time, fines, and probation, a conviction under Penal Code § 666.5 PC can lead to other long-lasting consequences that can affect various aspects of your life. These include:
Permanent Criminal Record: A conviction under Penal Code § 666.5 PC results in a permanent felony record, which can affect employment opportunities, housing, and more.
Loss of Rights: As with other felony convictions, those convicted under Penal Code § 666.5 PC may lose certain civil rights, including the right to own or possess firearms.
Increased Future Penalties: If convicted again for auto theft or other crimes, the penalties could be even more severe due to the repeat offender status.
6. Aggravating Factors
Certain circumstances, known as aggravating factors, can lead to even harsher penalties under Penal Code § 666.5 PC. These factors can include:
The Value of the Stolen Vehicle: If the vehicle stolen in the second offense was particularly valuable, the court may impose a longer sentence.
Criminal History: A defendant with an extensive criminal history, particularly of theft-related crimes, may face the maximum penalty allowed under the law.
Use of Violence or Threats: If the auto theft involved force, violence, or threats, the defendant could face additional charges, such as carjacking (Penal Code § 215 PC), which carries even more severe penalties.
7. Mitigating Factors
Conversely, the court may consider mitigating factors that could reduce the sentence, such as:
Lack of Criminal History: If the prior conviction was the defendant’s only other offense, the court may impose a lighter sentence.
Cooperation with Law Enforcement: If the defendant cooperated with the police during the investigation, this might lead to reduced penalties.
Demonstrating Remorse: Showing genuine remorse and taking steps toward rehabilitation can sometimes result in more lenient sentencing, such as probation instead of prison time.
5. What Are the Related Offenses To Penal Code § 666.5 PC?
Penal Code § 666.5 PC deals with auto theft by individuals who have prior convictions for auto-related theft offenses. It enhances penalties for those who are repeat offenders. However, California law covers a variety of other offenses related to auto theft that may be charged in conjunction with or as alternatives to a violation of Penal Code § 666.5 PC. These related offenses include crimes such as grand theft auto, joyriding, carjacking, and more. Understanding these related offenses is important, as each carries its own set of penalties and legal implications.
1. Grand Theft Auto (Penal Code § 487(d)(1) PC)
One of the most common auto-related crimes is grand theft auto, which falls under Penal Code § 487(d)(1) PC. This law makes it a crime to steal someone’s vehicle with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of it. Grand theft auto is often charged in cases where the value of the vehicle exceeds $950, which classifies it as a felony.
Connection to Penal Code § 666.5 PC: If someone is convicted of grand theft auto and then commits another auto-related offense, Penal Code § 666.5 can be applied to enhance the penalties for the second offense.
Penalties: Grand theft auto can lead to up to 3 years in state prison for a first offense, with additional time under Penal Code § 666.5 for repeat offenders.
2. Joyriding (Vehicle Code § 10851 VC)
Joyriding refers to the unauthorized taking or use of someone’s vehicle temporarily, without the intent to permanently steal it. It is covered under Vehicle Code § 10851 VC. Unlike grand theft auto, joyriding is considered a less serious offense because the vehicle is intended to be returned to its owner.
Connection to Penal Code § 666.5 PC: Even though joyriding is often treated as a misdemeanor for first-time offenders, it can become a felony if the defendant has a prior auto theft-related conviction. In such cases, Penal Code § 666.5 may apply, leading to harsher penalties.
Penalties: Joyriding can result in up to 1 year in jail for a first offense, but with a prior conviction, the penalties can increase to 2, 3, or 4 years in state prison under Penal Code § 666.5.
3. Receiving or Buying a Stolen Vehicle (Penal Code § 496d PC)
Under Penal Code § 496d PC, it is illegal to knowingly receive, buy, or possess a stolen vehicle. This offense targets individuals who are involved in purchasing or holding onto stolen cars, even if they did not actually steal the vehicle themselves.
Connection to Penal Code § 666.5 PC: A conviction for receiving a stolen vehicle counts as an auto-related offense under Penal Code § 666.5. If someone has a prior conviction for receiving stolen property and is caught again, they may face the enhanced penalties provided by Penal Code § 666.5.
Penalties: Receiving or buying a stolen vehicle is a felony, punishable by up to 3 years in state prison. With a prior conviction, this time can be extended under Penal Code § 666.5.
4. Carjacking (Penal Code § 215 PC)
Carjacking involves taking a vehicle directly from the owner by force or fear and is a much more serious offense than simple auto theft. Penal Code § 215 PC makes carjacking a violent felony, and it carries severe penalties because of the threat or use of violence.
Connection to Penal Code § 666.5 PC: While carjacking is its own separate and serious offense, it shares elements with auto theft. However, Penal Code § 666.5 does not enhance penalties for carjacking, as it is already treated as a violent felony with severe consequences.
Penalties: A conviction for carjacking can result in 3, 5, or 9 years in state prison, with additional time if a weapon was used or if the victim was injured.
5. Auto Burglary (Penal Code § 459 PC)
Auto burglary, covered under Penal Code § 459 PC, involves breaking into a locked vehicle with the intent to steal either the vehicle itself or items inside. While auto burglary doesn’t always involve the actual theft of the vehicle, it is often connected to larger auto theft operations.
Connection to Penal Code § 666.5 PC: A prior conviction for auto burglary can trigger Penal Code § 666.5 if the defendant is later convicted of an auto-related theft offense. Auto burglary itself is treated as a form of theft, so it fits into the scope of repeat auto theft enhancements.
Penalties: Auto burglary is typically a felony, carrying a sentence of up to 3 years in state prison. Repeat offenders may face enhanced penalties under Penal Code § 666.5.
6. Petty Theft with a Prior (Penal Code § 666 PC)
While petty theft generally involves stealing items worth less than $950 and is treated as a misdemeanor, Penal Code § 666 PC increases the penalties for individuals with prior theft convictions. If someone with a prior theft-related conviction is caught committing petty theft again, they can face felony charges and harsher penalties.
Connection to Penal Code § 666.5 PC: Though petty theft does not always involve auto theft, the principle of repeat offender enhancements is similar to Penal Code § 666.5. In both cases, repeat offenders face much more severe consequences for subsequent offenses.
Penalties: Petty theft with a prior conviction can lead to up to 3 years in state prison, depending on the defendant’s criminal history.
7. Operating a Chop Shop (Vehicle Code § 10801 VC)
A chop shop is a location where stolen vehicles are dismantled for parts or resold as a whole. Vehicle Code § 10801 VC makes it illegal to knowingly operate or work in a chop shop. This offense is closely tied to organized auto theft rings and is treated as a serious crime.
Connection to Penal Code § 666.5 PC: Operating a chop shop is considered an auto theft-related offense. If someone with a prior conviction for operating a chop shop commits another auto theft offense, they may face enhanced penalties under Penal Code § 666.5.
Penalties: Operating a chop shop is a felony, with penalties of up to 4 years in state prison. Repeat offenses can lead to longer prison terms under Penal Code § 666.5.
Protecting Your Rights, Defending Your Future
Get in touch with our lawyers today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help you. We are here to answer your questions and provide you with the support you need during this difficult time.
Client Satisfaction Is Priority
You Are More Than What They Say
We Always Go The Extra Mile