Penal Code § 68 PC – Bribery by an Executive Officer
1. What is Penal Code § 68 PC?
Penal Code § 68 PC Law Reads As Followed:
“Every executive officer, ministerial officer, or public employee of the State of California, who requests, receives, or agrees to receive any bribe, upon any understanding that the vote, opinion, or decision of such officer will be influenced thereby, is guilty of bribery.”
2. What Are Examples of Penal Code § 68 PC?
Penal Code § 68 PC addresses bribery specifically involving executive officers, ministerial officers, and public employees in California. Understanding real-world examples of violations under this statute can help illustrate its application and the behaviors it seeks to deter. Below are several scenarios that exemplify violations of Penal Code § 68 PC.
1. Police Officer Accepting Cash for Favorable Treatment
Imagine a police officer who pulls over a driver for a traffic violation. Instead of issuing a ticket, the officer accepts a cash payment from the driver in exchange for not citing them. In this situation, the officer is committing a violation of Penal Code § 68 by accepting a bribe with the intent to influence their official duties, namely enforcing traffic laws.
2. City Official Receiving Gifts for Zoning Approval
A city planning official is approached by a developer seeking approval for a new construction project. The developer offers the official expensive gifts and promises of future financial benefits in exchange for expedited zoning approval. If the official accepts these gifts under the understanding that they would influence their decision-making process regarding the project, this constitutes bribery under Penal Code § 68.
3. Public Employee Manipulating Contract Awards
A public employee involved in the procurement process for a government contract is offered a substantial sum of money by a contractor in exchange for favoring their bid over competitors. If the public employee accepts the bribe with the intent to unlawfully influence the contract award, this action violates Penal Code § 68, as it demonstrates corrupt intent to manipulate public resources for personal gain.
4. Ministerial Officer Accepting Money for Expedited Services
Consider a clerk in a government office responsible for processing permits. A citizen approaches the clerk and offers a bribe to expedite the processing of their permit application. If the clerk accepts this bribe with the intent to influence their official duties, this too is a violation of Penal Code § 68, as the clerk is leveraging their position for personal gain.
5. Election Official Taking Bribes for Vote Manipulation
An election official responsible for overseeing the voting process is approached by a political candidate who offers money to manipulate the results of an election. If the official agrees to take the bribe to unlawfully influence the election outcome, this constitutes a clear violation of Penal Code § 68, reflecting a severe breach of public trust.
3. What are Common Defenses Against Penal Code § 68 PC?
Defending against charges of bribery under Penal Code § 68 PC can be complex, as the prosecution must prove specific elements beyond a reasonable doubt. However, there are several common defenses that a defendant can employ to challenge the accusations. Understanding these defenses can be crucial for anyone facing charges under this statute.
1. Lack of Official Status
One of the primary defenses against a charge under Penal Code § 68 is proving that the defendant was not an executive officer, ministerial officer, or public employee of the State of California at the time of the alleged offense. If the defendant can demonstrate that they did not hold any of these positions, the prosecution may not have a valid case. For example, if a person was a private citizen and not acting in an official capacity, they cannot be charged under this statute.
2. No Bribe Was Accepted
To be convicted under Penal Code § 68, the prosecution must show that the defendant accepted, requested, or agreed to receive a bribe. If the defendant can argue that no actual bribe was involved—for instance, if they merely received a gift with no expectation of influence over their official duties—this defense can effectively undermine the prosecution’s case. The absence of a clear agreement or understanding regarding the influence of the alleged bribe can also weaken the charge.
3. No Representation of Unlawful Influence
A critical element of bribery under Penal Code § 68 is that the defendant must have represented that the bribe would unlawfully influence their official acts. A defendant can argue that they did not make such a representation. For example, if the accused merely accepted money without discussing its intended influence on their official duties, they may not meet the criteria for a bribery charge. This defense hinges on demonstrating that no corrupt intent existed at the time of the alleged offense.
4. Entrapment
Entrapment occurs when law enforcement officials induce a person to commit a crime they would not have otherwise committed. If a defendant can demonstrate that they were lured or coerced into accepting a bribe through deceptive practices by law enforcement—such as during a sting operation—this defense may be viable. The defendant must show that they would not have engaged in the bribery had it not been for the unlawful actions of the police.
5. Coercion or Duress
In some cases, a defendant may claim that they were coerced or threatened into accepting a bribe. If the defendant can provide evidence that they faced immediate danger or threats of harm unless they complied with the demands of the individual offering the bribe, this defense may be applicable. Coercion or duress can illustrate that the defendant did not act out of free will, which can lead to reduced culpability.
our clients say it best
Client Testimonials
4. What are The Penalties for Violating Penal Code § 68 PC?
Violating California Penal Code § 68 PC, which pertains to bribery by an executive officer, carries serious consequences. Understanding the penalties associated with this offense is crucial for anyone facing such charges or for individuals seeking to understand the legal framework surrounding bribery in California.
Classification of the Offense
Penal Code § 68 PC classifies bribery by an executive officer as a felony offense. This classification signifies that the crime is viewed as a severe violation of public trust and integrity within governmental roles.
Potential Penalties
If convicted under Penal Code § 68, a defendant may face several potential penalties, including:
Imprisonment: A violation of Penal Code § 68 can result in imprisonment in state prison for up to four years. The length of the prison sentence can depend on various factors, including the circumstances surrounding the offense, the defendant’s prior criminal history, and the specifics of the case.
Fines: In addition to imprisonment, the court may impose significant fines on the defendant. While the exact amount can vary, fines for felony offenses can be substantial and may range up to $10,000 or more, depending on the severity of the bribery involved.
Probation: In some cases, a judge may grant felony probation instead of imposing a prison sentence. This alternative allows the defendant to serve their sentence under supervision while fulfilling certain conditions set by the court. If the defendant successfully completes probation, they may avoid serving time in prison, but violations of probation terms can lead to harsher penalties.
Additional Consequences
Beyond imprisonment and fines, a conviction for violating Penal Code § 68 can have additional far-reaching consequences, including:
Loss of Employment: Individuals convicted under this statute may find it challenging to maintain employment in public service or other government-related positions. Many employers conduct background checks that can reveal felony convictions, leading to job loss or difficulty securing future employment.
Loss of Professional Licenses: Certain professional licenses may be revoked or suspended following a felony conviction. This can include licenses for professions such as law, finance, or other fields that require integrity and trustworthiness.
Negative Immigration Consequences: For non-citizens, a conviction under Penal Code § 68 may result in significant immigration issues, including deportation or being deemed inadmissible to the United States. Bribery can be classified as an aggravated felony, leading to severe repercussions.
Impact on Gun Rights: A felony conviction will result in the loss of gun rights under California law. Convicted felons are prohibited from owning or possessing firearms, which can significantly affect personal freedoms and rights.
5. What Are the Related Offenses To Penal Code § 68 PC?
California Penal Code § 68 PC addresses bribery specifically involving executive officers, ministerial officers, and public employees. However, the legal landscape surrounding bribery includes several related offenses that address various forms of bribery and corruption. Understanding these related offenses can provide insight into the broader context of bribery laws in California.
1. Bribing an Executive Officer (PC § 67)
Penal Code § 67 makes it illegal for individuals to bribe executive officers. While Penal Code § 68 penalizes the executive officer for accepting a bribe, PC § 67 targets those who offer or give bribes to such officials. Both statutes reflect California’s commitment to maintaining integrity in public service and combating corruption.
2. Bribery of Legislators (PC § 85)
Penal Code § 85 addresses the bribery of state legislators. This statute specifically prohibits offering or giving bribes to legislators in exchange for influencing their votes or actions on legislative matters. It aims to prevent corruption within the legislative process, ensuring that elected officials act in the public interest rather than for personal gain.
3. Bribery by Legislators (PC § 86)
Conversely, Penal Code § 86 criminalizes the act of bribery committed by legislators and other elected officials. This statute ensures that those in power are held accountable for accepting bribes to influence their legislative actions or decisions. Both PC § 85 and PC § 86 work together to create a framework that protects the integrity of the legislative process.
4. Bribery of Witnesses (PC § 137)
Penal Code § 137 makes it a crime to bribe a witness in order to influence their testimony. This offense targets attempts to corrupt the judicial process by undermining the integrity of witness statements, which are critical to fair trials. Ensuring that witnesses provide truthful testimony is essential for maintaining the justice system’s integrity.
5. Bribery by Witnesses (PC § 138)
Conversely, Penal Code § 138 addresses the crime of bribery by witnesses, making it illegal for a witness to accept a bribe in exchange for providing false testimony or withholding information. This statute aims to prevent witnesses from being coerced or manipulated into compromising their integrity in legal proceedings.
6. Extortion (PC § 518)
Penal Code § 518 defines extortion as obtaining property or services through coercion or threats. While extortion and bribery are distinct offenses, they share similarities, as both involve illicit exchanges intended to influence actions or decisions. Extortion typically involves threats of harm or retaliation, whereas bribery involves the exchange of value for favorable treatment.
7. Fraud (PC § 487)
Fraud offenses under Penal Code § 487 can overlap with bribery, particularly in cases where deceitful practices are used to gain a financial advantage or to influence decision-making. Fraud may involve misrepresentation or deceit, making it another related offense that can arise in situations involving bribery.
Protecting Your Rights, Defending Your Future
Get in touch with our lawyers today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help you. We are here to answer your questions and provide you with the support you need during this difficult time.
Client Satisfaction Is Priority
You Are More Than What They Say
We Always Go The Extra Mile