Penal Code § 86 PC - Bribery by Legislators or Elected Officials
1. What is Penal Code § 86 PC?
Penal Code § 86 PC Law Reads As Followed:
Every person who, being a legislative officer, willfully requests, accepts, or agrees to accept any bribe, knowing at the time that the bribe is intended to unlawfully influence their official acts, decisions, votes, or opinions, is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of up to four years, and/or substantial fines. A bribe, as defined by Penal Code § 86, refers to any offer of value or advantage intended to corruptly influence the actions of a legislative officer.
2. What are Examples of Penal Code § 86 PC?
Penal Code § 86 PC addresses the serious offense of bribery involving legislators or elected officials in California. Understanding the practical applications of this statute can shed light on how bribery manifests within government structures. Here, we explore several examples that illustrate violations of Penal Code § 86.
1. Accepting a Bribe for Legislative Favor
A city council member might be approached by a developer seeking approval for a new housing project. In exchange for a favorable vote, the council member accepts a cash payment from the developer. This scenario exemplifies a direct violation of Penal Code § 86, as the official has solicited and accepted a bribe with the intent to influence their official decision.
2. Offering a Bribe to Influence a Vote
In another case, a state legislator might be offered a luxury vacation package by a special interest group in return for voting in favor of legislation that benefits the group. If the legislator accepts the offer, they have engaged in bribery, violating Penal Code § 86 by allowing an outside entity to unlawfully influence their vote.
3. Collusion Between Legislators
Two legislators might conspire to exchange votes on certain bills. For instance, Legislator A agrees to vote in favor of Legislator B’s proposed bill, and in return, Legislator B promises to support a bill that Legislator A favors. If either party provides an inducement, such as money or gifts, to solidify this agreement, it can be classified as bribery under Penal Code § 86.
4. Receiving Gifts with Conditions
A school board member receives expensive gifts from a contractor who provides services to the school district. If the contractor later requests that the board member advocate for a particular project or approve contracts worth significant sums, the acceptance of those gifts, coupled with the request for favorable action, can be seen as bribery.
5. Misrepresentation of Influence
An elected official may claim they can facilitate a grant or funding for a nonprofit organization in exchange for a donation to their campaign. If the official receives this donation while intending to unlawfully influence public funding decisions, it constitutes a violation of Penal Code § 86.
6. Public Corruption Investigation
In a broader investigation, a group of city officials is found to be participating in a bribery scheme involving multiple contractors seeking city contracts. Evidence shows that the officials were taking bribes in return for ensuring that these contractors received lucrative deals, directly violating Penal Code § 86.
3. What are the Common Defenses Against Penal Code § 86 PC?
When faced with accusations under Penal Code § 86 PC, which pertains to bribery by legislators or elected officials, defendants may employ various legal defenses to contest the charges. Understanding these defenses is crucial for anyone navigating the complexities of a bribery allegation. Here are some common defenses against charges under Penal Code § 86:
1. Not a Legislative Officer
One of the primary defenses is to challenge the claim that the defendant was a legislative officer at the time of the alleged offense. Penal Code § 86 applies strictly to individuals holding specific positions, such as state legislators or members of local legislative bodies. If the accused can prove that they did not hold such a status, the case against them may be dismissed.
2. Lack of Corrupt Intent
To secure a conviction under Penal Code § 86, the prosecution must demonstrate that the defendant acted with corrupt intent. A common defense is to argue that the defendant did not have the intention to unlawfully influence their official duties. This could involve presenting evidence showing that the defendant’s actions were misinterpreted or that they had legitimate reasons for their behavior.
3. Entrapment
Entrapment occurs when law enforcement officers induce or coerce a person into committing a crime they would not have otherwise committed. If the defendant can establish that they were entrapped by undercover officers or informants, this can serve as a strong defense against bribery charges. Evidence of coercion or manipulation can demonstrate that the defendant did not willingly engage in the alleged criminal behavior.
4. Insufficient Evidence
In any criminal case, the burden of proof lies with the prosecution. Defendants can argue that there is insufficient evidence to support the bribery allegations. This may involve questioning the credibility of witnesses, the reliability of recorded conversations, or the interpretation of any documents presented as evidence. If the prosecution fails to meet its burden, the case may be dismissed.
5. Ambiguous Agreements
Sometimes, what may appear to be a bribery arrangement can be interpreted as a legitimate business transaction or a campaign contribution. Defendants can argue that the terms of the agreement were misunderstood or that there was no intention to exchange favors for bribes. Demonstrating that the interaction fell within legal boundaries can weaken the prosecution’s case.
6. Misinterpretation of Actions
In some cases, actions taken by the defendant might be misinterpreted as bribery. For instance, if a legislative officer accepts gifts or favors without the intent to influence their duties, they could argue that their actions were not criminal. Presenting evidence of customary practices or established relationships can help clarify the context of the interaction.
our clients say it best
Client Testimonials
4. What are The Penalties for Violating Penal Code § 86 PC?
Violating Penal Code § 86 PC, which addresses bribery by legislators or elected officials, carries serious legal repercussions. This statute is designed to maintain the integrity of government operations and ensure that public officials act in the best interest of their constituents. Understanding the penalties associated with this offense is crucial for those facing allegations under this law.
1. Classification as a Felony
Bribery under Penal Code § 86 is classified as a felony. This classification signifies that the offense is considered a serious crime, subjecting the defendant to harsher penalties compared to misdemeanor offenses. A felony conviction can have long-term consequences, including a permanent criminal record, which may affect employment opportunities, professional licenses, and other aspects of life.
2. Imprisonment
A conviction under Penal Code § 86 can result in significant prison time. The potential imprisonment for those found guilty is up to four years in state prison. This substantial sentence reflects the severity of bribery offenses, particularly given the role of public officials in upholding ethical standards in governance.
3. Fines
In addition to imprisonment, individuals convicted of bribery under this statute may face substantial fines. The exact amount can vary based on the circumstances of the case, but fines are typically significant, reflecting the serious nature of the crime. Fines serve as both punishment and a deterrent to prevent future offenses.
4. Felony Probation
In certain situations, a judge may grant felony probation instead of imposing a prison sentence. This alternative allows the defendant to remain in the community while complying with specific conditions set by the court. These conditions may include regular check-ins with a probation officer, community service, attending counseling or rehabilitation programs, and maintaining employment. However, if the defendant violates any terms of probation, they may face additional penalties, including potential imprisonment.
5. Impact on Career and Reputation
The consequences of a bribery conviction extend beyond legal penalties. Public officials convicted of violating Penal Code § 86 may face professional repercussions, including loss of office, disqualification from future public service, and damage to their reputation. This impact can deter others from pursuing a career in public service or tarnish the public’s trust in governmental institutions.
6. Expungement Limitations
Under California law, individuals convicted of bribery under Penal Code § 86 can only seek expungement of their conviction if they received probation rather than a prison sentence. Those sentenced to prison are barred from having their records expunged, meaning the conviction will remain on their criminal record indefinitely.
5. What are the Related Offenses To Penal Code § 86 PC?
Penal Code § 86 PC addresses the crime of bribery specifically involving legislators or elected officials in California. Understanding this statute also involves recognizing its relationship with other criminal offenses that fall within the broader category of bribery and corruption. Here, we explore the related offenses that share similarities with Penal Code § 86.
1. Bribery by or of Executive Officers (PC § 67 and § 68)
Penal Code § 67 and § 68 govern bribery involving executive officers. While Penal Code § 86 focuses on legislative officers, these statutes address bribery related to those in executive positions, such as governors, mayors, and other high-ranking officials. The key elements of bribery remain consistent across these offenses, including the need for corrupt intent and the unlawful exchange of value for favorable actions or decisions.
2. Bribery by or of Judges and Jurors (PC § 92 and § 93)
Bribery involving judges and jurors is outlined in Penal Code § 92 and § 93. These statutes make it a crime to offer or accept bribes intended to influence judicial proceedings. Similar to Penal Code § 86, these laws emphasize the importance of integrity in the legal system and the serious consequences for those who engage in bribery to sway court outcomes.
3. Bribery by or of Witnesses (PC § 137 and § 138)
Penal Code § 137 and § 138 address bribery involving witnesses in legal proceedings. Offering or accepting a bribe to secure testimony or silence a witness undermines the justice system. Like other bribery offenses, these laws require proof of corrupt intent and an exchange aimed at influencing the integrity of the judicial process.
4. Conspiracy to Commit Bribery (PC § 182)
Conspiracy to commit bribery involves an agreement between two or more individuals to engage in bribery, even if the bribery itself has not yet occurred. Under Penal Code § 182, individuals can face charges for conspiring to commit any crime, including bribery. This statute broadens the scope of potential liability for those involved in corrupt activities, even if they do not directly participate in the bribery.
5. Corruption of Public Officials (Various Statutes)
In addition to specific bribery laws, California has various statutes addressing corruption in public office more broadly. These laws encompass a range of activities that undermine the ethical conduct of public officials, including accepting gifts or favors in exchange for preferential treatment. Engaging in such actions can lead to serious legal consequences similar to those for bribery under Penal Code § 86.
Protecting Your Rights, Defending Your Future
Get in touch with our lawyers today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help you. We are here to answer your questions and provide you with the support you need during this difficult time.
Client Satisfaction Is Priority
You Are More Than What They Say
We Always Go The Extra Mile