Penal Code § 92 PC - Bribery of Judges or Jurors

Table of contents

Click To travel To Chapters

1. What is Penal code § 92 PC?

California Penal Code § 92 addresses the crime of bribery involving judges and jurors. This statute is crucial for upholding the integrity of the judicial system by prohibiting any attempts to influence judicial officers through bribery.

Elements of the Offense

To secure a conviction under Penal Code 92 PC, the prosecution must demonstrate two key elements:

Offering or Giving Something of Value: The accused must have given or offered to give something of value to a judicial officer. This can include money, gifts, or any other form of compensation that could influence the officer’s decision-making.
Corrupt Intent: The accused must have acted with the corrupt intent to influence the judicial officer’s decision in an official matter. This means that the bribe was intended to affect the outcome of a case, decision, or proceeding.

For the purposes of this statute, a “judicial officer” includes various roles such as:

Judges
Jurors
Referees
Arbitrators
Umpires
Any person authorized to hear or determine questions or controversies

It’s important to note that the law does not require a specific case or action to be pending at the time the bribe is received. The mere act of giving a bribe with the intention of influencing any future case or decision is sufficient for prosecution.

Penal Code 92 PC serves as a vital safeguard against corruption in the judicial system, ensuring that judges and jurors remain impartial and untainted by outside influence. Understanding the elements of the offense, potential defenses, penalties, and related crimes is essential for anyone involved in legal proceedings surrounding bribery. If you or someone you know is facing charges under this statute, seeking experienced legal representation is crucial to navigate the complexities of the law effectively.

Penal Code § 92 PC Law Reads As Followed:

“Every person who gives or offers to give any bribe to a judicial officer, with the corrupt intent to influence the decision of that officer in an official matter, is guilty of bribery. This includes the giving of anything of value to a judge, juror, referee, arbitrator, or any person authorized to hear or determine any question or controversy.”

2. What Are Examples of Penal Code § 92 PC?

California Penal Code § 92 PC addresses the serious offense of bribing judges and jurors. Understanding real-world examples of this crime can illuminate the various ways individuals may attempt to manipulate the judicial system and highlight the legal repercussions associated with such actions. Here are several scenarios that exemplify violations of Penal Code § 92 PC.

1. Offering Money to a Judge for a Favorable Ruling

In a civil case, a litigant approaches a judge during a break in the proceedings and offers cash in exchange for a favorable ruling on a pending motion. If the judge accepts the money with the understanding that it will influence their decision, this act constitutes a clear violation of Penal Code § 92. The intent to corruptly influence the judge’s decision makes this a prosecutable offense.

2. Gifts to Jurors During a Trial

Imagine a defendant on trial for a serious crime who decides to give gifts—such as expensive meals or entertainment tickets—to members of the jury in an effort to sway their verdict. If it can be shown that the gifts were given with the intent to influence the jurors’ decisions, this scenario would fall under Penal Code § 92, as it directly attempts to bribe individuals who play a crucial role in the judicial process.

3. A Lawyer Offering Bribes to Judges

A defense attorney, aiming to secure a lighter sentence for their client, offers a judge a sum of money to influence the judge’s sentencing decision. This scenario exemplifies bribery as it involves a legal professional attempting to compromise the integrity of the judicial system by directly influencing a judge’s ruling. Such actions are a direct violation of Penal Code § 92.

4. Influencing an Arbitrator

In an arbitration case, one party offers an arbitrator a financial incentive to rule in their favor. If the arbitrator accepts this bribe with the intent of corruptly influencing their decision on the case, this act also constitutes a violation of Penal Code § 92. Arbitrators, like judges and jurors, are included in the definition of judicial officers under this statute.

5. Bribing a Umpire in a Sports Dispute

Consider a situation where a sports team seeks to influence the outcome of a dispute regarding player eligibility. A representative from the team approaches the umpire and offers a bribe to favor their position during the decision-making process. If the umpire accepts this bribe, it would represent a violation of Penal Code § 92, as the umpire is acting in a judicial capacity to resolve the dispute.

3. What Are Common Defenses Against Penal Code § 92 PC?

Facing charges under California Penal Code § 92 PC, which addresses the bribery of judges and jurors, can have severe consequences. However, individuals accused of this crime have the right to defend themselves using various legal strategies. Understanding these common defenses can be crucial for anyone involved in a bribery case. Below are some of the most effective defenses against charges under Penal Code § 92.

1. Lack of Criminal Intent

One of the most fundamental defenses in a bribery case is the lack of criminal intent. To be convicted under Penal Code § 92, the prosecution must prove that the accused acted with corrupt intent to influence the judicial officer’s decision. If the defendant can demonstrate that they did not intend to bribe the judge or juror or that their actions were misinterpreted, this defense can undermine the prosecution’s case. For example, if the accused can show that the monetary exchange was a legitimate transaction and not intended to influence the judicial process, they may avoid conviction.

2. No Value Given

Another defense against Penal Code § 92 is asserting that no bribe or thing of value was actually given or offered. If the defendant can demonstrate that they did not provide anything of value—whether money, gifts, or other incentives—to the judicial officer, the charges may lack the necessary evidence to proceed. This defense is particularly effective if the accused can show that the alleged bribe was mischaracterized or that no intent to influence existed.

3. Entrapment

Entrapment is a legal defense that applies when law enforcement officials induce a person to commit a crime they would not have committed otherwise. If the accused can prove that they were coerced or manipulated into offering a bribe by undercover officers or agents, this defense can lead to a dismissal of charges. The key is showing that the law enforcement conduct was so compelling that it prompted the defendant to act against their better judgment.

4. Coerced Confession

If a confession was obtained through coercion or improper interrogation techniques, it may be inadmissible in court. California law prohibits law enforcement from using overbearing tactics to extract confessions. If the defendant can demonstrate that their confession was obtained under duress or through coercive means, the judge may exclude the confession from evidence, potentially weakening the prosecution’s case significantly.

5. Mistake of Fact

A mistake of fact defense can be raised if the defendant genuinely believed that their actions were legal or appropriate. For instance, if the accused thought they were giving a gift without the intention of influencing a judicial decision, this misunderstanding may negate the corrupt intent required for a bribery conviction. Demonstrating that the accused acted under a false belief can be a compelling defense.

6. Lack of Official Status

Lastly, the defense can argue that the individual charged did not hold the status of a judicial officer or did not act in their official capacity when the alleged bribery took place. If the accused can establish that they were not a judge, juror, or any other recognized judicial officer, the charges may be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

our clients say it best

Client Testimonials

4. What Are The Penalties for Violating Penal Code § 92 PC?

Violating California Penal Code § 92 PC, which prohibits bribery of judges and jurors, is a serious offense that carries significant legal consequences. Understanding the potential penalties associated with this crime is crucial for anyone facing such charges or seeking to understand the ramifications of bribery in the judicial system.

Classification of the Offense

Penal Code § 92 PC classifies bribery of judges and jurors as a felony offense. This classification reflects the severity of the crime and the impact it can have on the integrity of the judicial process.

Potential Penalties

If convicted under Penal Code § 92, a defendant may face several possible penalties, including:

Imprisonment: A violation of Penal Code § 92 can result in imprisonment for up to four years in state prison. The length of the sentence can vary based on factors such as the specifics of the case, the defendant’s prior criminal history, and any aggravating circumstances involved in the bribery.
Fines: In addition to imprisonment, the court may impose substantial fines on the defendant. While the exact amount can differ based on the case, fines for felony offenses can be significant, potentially reaching $10,000 or more.
Felony Probation: In some cases, the judge may grant felony probation instead of imposing a prison sentence. This option allows the defendant to serve their sentence under supervised conditions while fulfilling certain requirements set by the court. Successful completion of probation can lead to a reduced sentence, but violations of probation terms can result in harsher penalties.

Additional Consequences

Beyond imprisonment and fines, a conviction for violating Penal Code § 92 can have additional far-reaching consequences, including:

Loss of Employment: Individuals convicted under this statute may face challenges in maintaining employment, especially in public service or government-related positions. Many employers conduct background checks that reveal felony convictions, leading to job loss or difficulties securing future employment.
Loss of Professional Licenses: Certain professional licenses may be revoked or suspended following a felony conviction. This can affect individuals in various fields, particularly those that require high levels of trust and integrity.
Negative Immigration Consequences: For non-citizens, a conviction under Penal Code § 92 may result in severe immigration repercussions. Some felony convictions can be classified as “aggravated felonies,” leading to deportation or being marked as inadmissible to the United States.
Impact on Gun Rights: A felony conviction will also result in the loss of gun rights. Under California law, convicted felons are prohibited from owning or possessing firearms, which can significantly affect personal freedoms.

5. What Are Related Offenses To Penal Code § 92 PC?

California Penal Code § 92 PC addresses the crime of bribery specifically involving judges and jurors. This statute is part of a broader legal framework designed to combat corruption and protect the integrity of the judicial system. Understanding related offenses can provide insight into the various forms of bribery and corruption that the law seeks to prevent. Here are several key related offenses to Penal Code § 92.

1. Bribery of Judges or Jurors (PC § 93)

Penal Code § 93 makes it a crime for a judicial officer to ask for or receive any bribe. This statute complements PC § 92 by addressing the receiving end of bribery. While Penal Code § 92 penalizes individuals who offer bribes to judges or jurors, PC § 93 ensures that those in positions of power are also held accountable for corrupt behavior. Both statutes work together to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.

2. Bribery by or of Witnesses (PC § 137 and 138)

Penal Code § 137 addresses the crime of bribery involving witnesses, making it illegal to bribe a witness to influence their testimony or actions in a legal proceeding. Conversely, Penal Code § 138 criminalizes the act of witnesses accepting bribes. These offenses are significant as they directly impact the reliability of witness testimonies, which are crucial for maintaining justice in legal proceedings. Both statutes carry felony penalties and are designed to ensure that the judicial process remains fair and unbiased.

3. Bribery of Executive Officers (PC § 67 and 68)

California law also includes statutes addressing bribery involving executive officers. Penal Code § 67 makes it a crime to bribe any executive officer, while Penal Code § 68 prohibits executive officers, ministerial officers, or public employees from asking for or taking bribes. Although these statutes do not specifically pertain to judges or jurors, they reflect a broader commitment to combat corruption within public service and maintain accountability among those in positions of authority.

4. Conspiracy to Commit Bribery (PC § 182)

Penal Code § 182 outlines the crime of conspiracy, which can include planning to commit bribery. If two or more individuals agree to engage in a bribery scheme, they may face conspiracy charges, even if the bribery itself has not been successfully executed. This offense emphasizes that the act of conspiring to commit bribery is punishable, highlighting the seriousness with which California law views any attempt to corrupt the judicial process.

5. Extortion (PC § 518)

While distinct from bribery, Penal Code § 518 addresses extortion, which involves obtaining property or services through coercion or threats. Extortion and bribery share similarities, as both involve illicit exchanges intended to influence actions or decisions. The presence of coercion in extortion cases can also undermine the integrity of the judicial process, making this related offense significant in discussions of corruption.

Protecting Your Rights, Defending Your Future

Get in touch with our lawyers today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help you. We are here to answer your questions and provide you with the support you need during this difficult time.

Client Satisfaction Is Priority

You Are More Than What They Say

We Always Go The Extra Mile

Get A Free Consult

818.650.1744

@Gracelegalgroup