Grace Legal Group

Take Advantage of Our 100% Free Consultation To Secure Redemption

Firearms & Weapons Charge Attorneys

b5995f89ebd2a41769f2da71cadda0e7 1

Free Consultation

4eca0c0e42ca7b9954c8920cff92a02f
4eca0c0e42ca7b9954c8920cff92a02f

Need a Consultation For a Weapons Charge?

Fill out the form below and a member of our legal team will contact you back shortly—usually within minutes. 

our clients say it best

Client Testimonials

Follow Us On Instagram

@Gracelegalgroup

Why Trust Grace Legal Group for Domestic Violence Defense?

California operates under the strictest and most convoluted firearm regulatory scheme in the nation. It is a legal minefield where a slight modification to a rifle grip, the placement of a handgun in a glove box instead of a trunk, or the presence of a “standard capacity” magazine can instantly transform a law-abiding citizen into a defendant facing a felony prison sentence. The laws are designed to be confusing, and the penalties are designed to be severe.

At Grace Legal Group, we recognize that many weapons charges are not crimes of violence—they are crimes of technicality. We defend gun owners, collectors, and citizens who have been caught in the dragnet of California’s penal code. Whether you are facing a “Ghost Gun” allegation or a sentence enhancement for self-defense, we bring a deep understanding of both ballistics and constitutional law to your defense. We do not just argue the law; we challenge the state’s infringement on your rights.

The "Transport" Trap (PC 25400/25850)

Most firearm arrests happen during routine traffic stops when police ask, “Do you have anything in the car I should know about?” A truthful answer often leads to a felony arrest because the gun was not in a “locked container” or the ammunition was not separated. To combat this, we specialize in filing Fourth Amendment Suppression Motions that attack the basis of the stop itself. We scrutinize whether the officer had a valid reason to pull you over or if it was a pretext for a fishing expedition. If we can prove the stop or the subsequent search was unconstitutional, the gun is deemed “fruit of the poisonous tree,” and the case must be dismissed.

The "Feature" Defense (Assault Weapons)

Prosecutors often misidentify legal weapons as “Assault Weapons” simply because they look scary or have tactical accessories. They frequently confuse cosmetic features like muzzle brakes with illegal flash hiders, or fin grips with prohibited pistol grips. We counter this ignorance with technical expertise. We understand the mechanics of bullet buttons, featureless builds, and fixed magazines. By bringing in expert armorers to perform a forensic examination of the weapon, we can prove to the court that your rifle was compliant with California law at the time of seizure, forcing the District Attorney to drop the charges.

The "Constructive Possession" Dragnet

You do not have to be holding a gun to be charged with it. Under the theory of “Constructive Possession,” prosecutors will often charge everyone in a car or a house with a single firearm found under a seat or in a nightstand, arguing that mere access equates to possession. We aggressively fight this presumption by proving a lack of dominion and control. We argue that proximity is not ownership. Unless the state can prove via DNA, fingerprints, or text messages that you specifically knew the gun was there and intended to control it, you cannot be convicted for someone else’s weapon.

The "Self-Defense" Paradox

California law creates a cruel catch-22 where you use a firearm to save your life, but the police arrest you for “Brandishing” or “Assault with a Deadly Weapon.” In these cases, we aggressively assert Affirmative Self-Defense. We use 911 call logs, witness statements, and ballistic trajectory analysis to prove that you were the victim, not the aggressor. We demonstrate that your use of the firearm was a necessary and proportionate response to an imminent threat, transforming what the state calls a “crime” into a lawful act of survival.

II. The Structure of Possession Crimes in California

In California, you do not have to fire a weapon—or even touch it—to go to prison. The Penal Code is designed to punish the status of the weapon or the status of the owner. Understanding these possession statutes is critical because they often rely on technical definitions that we can challenge in court.

Here are the core possession statutes we fight:

1. The Transport Trap (Carrying a Concealed Firearm - PC 25400)

  • The Scenario: You are pulled over for speeding. You have a legally registered handgun tucked inside the center console or under the passenger seat for protection. You tell the officer, “I have a gun in the car,” thinking honesty will help. You are immediately arrested.
  • The Law: In California, unless you possess a valid CCW permit, a concealable firearm must be transported unloaded and secured in a “locked container” (such as a trunk or a dedicated gun safe). The glove box and center console are expressly excluded from this definition, even if they lock.
  • The Defense: We attack the “concealment” element. If the gun was in a locked bag on the seat, it was legal. We also litigate the “Place of Residence” Exception. If you were moving residences or transporting the gun directly to/from a range, you have a statutory defense. Most importantly, we scrutinize the traffic stop—if the officer lacked probable cause to search your car, the gun is inadmissible.

2. The "Loaded" Technicality (PC 25850)

  • The Scenario: You are transporting a rifle or handgun. The chamber is empty, but a loaded magazine is inserted into the magazine well.
  • The Law: California’s definition of “loaded” is broader than common sense suggests. Under the Penal Code, a firearm is considered “loaded” if there is an unexpended cartridge in the firing chamber OR in any magazine attached to the firearm. You can be charged with a crime even if the gun was mechanically incapable of firing in its current state.
  • The Defense: We focus on the “Knowledge” Element. The prosecution must prove you knew the gun was loaded. If you borrowed the car or the bag and were unaware of the magazine’s status, you cannot be convicted. We also litigate the location—PC 25850 only applies in a “public place” or on a “public street.” If you were on private property (like a driveway or a ranch), the statute may not apply.

3. The Lifetime Ban (Felon in Possession - PC 29800)

  • The Scenario: You have a felony conviction from 20 years ago, or a temporary Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO). Police search your home and find a firearm belonging to your spouse or roommate.
  • The Consequence: This is a “status crime.” It carries a mandatory prison sentence in many cases, regardless of why the gun was there.
  • The Defense: We attack the theory of Constructive Possession. Just because a gun is in your house does not mean it is in your possession. We argue that you lacked “Dominion and Control” over the weapon—it was locked in a safe you couldn’t access, or it was in a roommate’s room. If you didn’t have the right or the ability to control the weapon, you are not guilty.

4. The "Unregistered" Escalation (PC 25850(c)(6))

  • The Scenario: You are caught carrying a loaded handgun in your car. Usually, this is a misdemeanor. However, the gun belongs to your father, your spouse, or was bought privately years ago and never formally registered in your name.
  • The Law: This is the trap that catches the most “accidental” criminals. Carrying a loaded firearm becomes an automatic straight felony if the person in possession is not the registered owner in the DOJ’s Automated Firearms System (AFS). A simple paperwork error transforms a ticket into a prison sentence.
  • The Defense: We trace the provenance of the weapon. We look for “Community Property” defenses (if it belongs to a spouse) or evidence of a pending transfer. If we can prove lawful ownership despite the clerical gap, we can often force the DA to reduce the charge back to a misdemeanor or dismiss it entirely.

The New Frontier: Ghost Guns, Assault Weapons & Magazines

The California legislature is currently waging a legislative war on “untraceable” and “military-style” weapons. These charges represent the most complex area of modern criminal defense because the laws change almost annually.

The Allegation: Possession or manufacture of a firearm without a DOJ-issued serial number (e.g., Polymer80 builds, 3D printed frames).

The Reality: Under AB 1621, the state now treats “Firearm Precursor Parts” (unfinished frames/receivers) as if they were fully functioning guns. Prosecutors treat hobbyists like international arms traffickers.

  • Our Defense: We challenge the “Readily Convertible” Standard. For a chunk of plastic or metal to be illegal, it must be “readily” convertible into a firing weapon. If your kit was still in the box, or if the machining was never completed, we argue it was just a piece of plastic, not a firearm. We also fight the “manufacturing” charge by proving you built it for personal use before the statutory ban dates.

The Allegation: Possession of a semi-automatic centerfire rifle (AR-15 or AK-style) with “banned features” such as a pistol grip, flash suppressor, or telescoping stock.

The Reality: The difference between a legal rifle and a felony “Assault Weapon” is often a piece of plastic worth $15 (a fin grip) or the type of magazine release button installed.

  • Our Defense: We use the Compliance Defense.” We often find that police officers strip the weapon during booking, removing the “fin grip” or “fixed mag” device to make it look illegal for the evidence photo. We use body cam footage and defense expert armorers to prove the weapon was “featureless” or “mag-locked” at the time of seizure, forcing a dismissal.

The Allegation: Possession of “nuisance” weapons: Brass knuckles, switchblades, batons, or short-barreled shotguns.

The Reality: Many of these items are sold openly in other states or online, trapping unwary owners.

  • Our Defense: We argue the “Curio or Relic” defense for older items (like a grandfather’s antique baton). We also challenge the classification of the object—proving that a “dirk or dagger” was actually a lawful work tool or fishing knife that was not “capable of ready use” as a stabbing weapon.

The Allegation: Possession, importation, or manufacture of a magazine capable of holding more than 10 rounds.

The Reality: This is one of the most litigated areas of law (Duncan v. Bonta). While simple possession is technically an infraction or misdemeanor, prosecutors often charge “Importation” or “Manufacture” as a felony if they catch you bringing them across state lines.

  • Our Defense: We assert the “Freedom Week” Exception. For one week in April 2019, it was legal to purchase these magazines in California. If you bought your magazines during that window, your possession is lawful. We place the burden on the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you did not buy them during that week—a timeline that is often impossible for them to establish.

When the Weapon is Used in California (Action Crimes)

The stakes escalate dramatically when a weapon is displayed, discharged, or even pointed. These are no longer “possession” crimes; they are “violent” felonies that can trigger life sentences.

California Weapon Use Penalties by Charge

Brandishing (The “Self-Defense” Paradox – PC 417)

  • The Charge: Drawing or exhibiting a weapon in a “rude, angry, or threatening manner.”
  • The Reality: You pulled your gun to de-escalate a threat, but the other guy called 911 first. The police arrive and see you as the aggressor.
  • Our Defense: We argue Affirmative Self-Defense (CALCRIM 3470). It is not a crime to display a weapon if you reasonably believe you are in imminent danger. We use witness testimony, surveillance video, and 911 logs to prove that your display was a “warning,” not a threat, and that you were the true victim acting to prevent harm.

The “10-20-Life” Enhancements (PC 12022.53)

The Charge: These are consecutive prison terms added to the base sentence of a felony (like Robbery or Assault) involving a firearm.

  • Use: +10 Years.
  • Discharge: +20 Years.
  • Great Bodily Injury: +25 Years to Life. Our Defense: We fight to strike the enhancement under Senate Bill 620. Before this law, judges had no choice. Now, we can file a “Romero Motion” asking the judge to dismiss the enhancement in the “interest of justice.” We present a mitigation package—showing your lack of criminal history or the unique circumstances of the event—to convince the judge that adding 20 years is excessive.

Shooting at Inhabited Dwellings (PC 246 vs. PC 246.3)

  • The Charge: Firing a gun at a house, car, or into the air.
  • Malicious Shooting (PC 246): Shooting at an occupied house or car. This is a “Strike” and carries a heavy prison sentence.
  • Negligent Discharge (PC 246.3): Shooting into the air (celebratory gunfire) or into the ground. This is a “wobbler” that can often be reduced to a misdemeanor.
  • Our Defense: The difference lies in the target. We analyze the ballistic trajectory to prove you were not aiming at a person or building (PC 246), but rather acted recklessly (PC 246.3). This distinction can save you from a Life Sentence.

Ammunition Violations (Prop 63 & PC 30305)

  • The Charge: Possession of ammunition by a “Prohibited Person” (Felon or person with a Restraining Order).
  • The Reality: Police raid a house and find a box of bullets in the garage or a shared closet.
  • Our Defense: We argue Lack of Exclusive Possession. Just because ammo was in your garage does not mean it was yours. If other people lived there or had access to the space, the state cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you exercised “dominion and control” over the ammunition.

"With Grace, There's Always a Second Chance"

Zino O. Osehobo, Esq.
Managing Attorney

The Grace Legal Group Shield: Technical & Constitutional Defense

Defending a gun case requires more than just knowing the Penal Code; it requires knowing the gun and the Constitution. We do not accept the police report as fact; we deconstruct the encounter frame by frame.

The Fourth Amendment Suppression Motion (PC 1538.5)

The most effective way to win a gun case is to prove the police never should have found the weapon in the first place.

  • The Argument: Police often invent reasons to search a car. They claim they “smelled marijuana” (which is no longer automatic probable cause in California) or that you “consented” when you actually stayed silent. We file a Motion to Suppress Evidence. We challenge the length of the detention (did they hold you too long just to call a K-9?) and the scope of the search.
  • The Result: If the judge agrees the stop or search was unconstitutional, the gun is suppressed as “fruit of the poisonous tree.” Without the gun, there is no evidence. Dismissal follows.

The "Momentary Possession" Defense (CALCRIM 2511)

Sometimes you handle a weapon briefly—to move it, to check it, or to take it away from someone dangerous.

  • The Argument: Under CALCRIM 2511, possession is not unlawful if it is “momentary or transitory” and for the purpose of disposal or abandonment. If you grabbed a gun from a friend to unload it and lock it away, or if you found a gun and were in the process of turning it in, you are not guilty of criminal possession. We use fingerprints and witness testimony to prove your intent was safety, not ownership.

The "Knowledge" Defense (Constructive Possession)

In a car with three people, who owns the gun found under the passenger seat?

  • The Argument: Prosecutors rely on “Constructive Possession,” arguing that because the gun was near you, it was yours. We fight this presumption.
  • The Strategy: We argue “Lack of Knowledge.” Proximity is not possession. Unless the state can prove you knew the gun was there (e.g., your DNA is on the magazine, or you texted about it), being a passenger in a car with a gun is not a crime. We force the state to prove “dominion and control” beyond a reasonable doubt, often resulting in acquittals for everyone in the vehicle.

The "Necessity" Defense (People v. King)

This is the “break glass in case of emergency” defense for prohibited persons.

  • The Scenario: You are a felon or have a restraining order, so you cannot touch a gun. But you are attacked in your home, and you grab your spouse’s gun to save your life.
  • The Argument: Under the landmark case People v. King, a prohibited person may temporarily possess a firearm if:
    1. They are in imminent peril of great bodily injury.
    2. There is no legal alternative to avoid the danger.
    3. They possess the weapon only as long as necessary to neutralize the threat.
  • The Result: If we can prove these elements, your possession was justified, and you cannot be convicted of being a “Felon in Possession.”

Protect Your Rights. Call Grace Legal Group.

A firearms arrest is more than just a criminal case; it is a direct threat to your civil liberties. In California, a single felony conviction—or even certain misdemeanors—can trigger a lifetime ban on owning, possessing, or even touching a firearm.

At Grace Legal Group, we do not just defend your freedom; we defend your Second Amendment rights. We understand that for many of our clients, firearms are not just property—they are a hobby, a means of protection, and a constitutional right. We fight to ensure a temporary legal battle does not become a permanent disarmament.

Our Pathway to Rights Restoration

  • The “Wobbler” Reduction (PC 17(b)): Many firearm offenses (like Carrying a Concealed Weapon) are “wobblers,” meaning they can be charged as felonies or misdemeanors. We aggressively negotiate to have felonies reduced to misdemeanors before a plea is entered. If successful, this preserves your right to own a firearm in the future (unless the charge involves domestic violence).
  • Motion for Return of Property: Police departments are notorious for seizing an entire collection when only one gun is in question—and then refusing to give them back. We file specific motions to force the department to return your lawful property once the case is resolved, preventing the state from destroying your valuable collection.
  • Petition for Factual Innocence (PC 851.8): If we get your case dismissed or you are acquitted, we take the extra step. We petition the court to declare you “Factually Innocent.” This completely seals and destroys the arrest record, ensuring that a background check for a future gun purchase or CCW permit comes back clean.

Why Gun Owners Trust Grace Legal Group

Clients choose us because we speak the language of the gun owner. You do not need to explain to us what a “bullet button” or a “lower receiver” is—we already know.

  • Technical Fluency: Most lawyers don’t know the difference between a flash hider and a muzzle brake. We do. We use this technical knowledge to educate judges and juries, proving that your “illegal assault weapon” was actually a compliant, featureless build.
  • Collection Protection: We understand the financial and sentimental value of a firearm collection. We fight to ensure that a single alleged violation does not result in the forfeiture of tens of thousands of dollars in legal property.
  • The “Intent” Defense: We humanize you. We distinguish between a “criminal” with a gun and a “citizen” who made a technical error. By presenting your background (CCW holder, veteran, collector), we dismantle the prosecution’s narrative that you are a danger to the public.

Protect Your Freedom Immediately

If you have been arrested for a firearms offense, do not try to explain yourself to the police. Police officers will act friendly. They will ask, “Why did you have this in the car?” or “Did you know this was modified?” These are traps. They are looking for an admission of knowledge or intent.

Contact Grace Legal Group immediately. We are available 24/7 to intervene at the station, assert your right to remain silent, and challenge the legality of the search. Call now for a confidential, strategy-focused consultation.

Protecting Your Rights, Defending Your Future

Get in touch with our lawyers today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help you. We are here to answer your questions and provide you with the support you need during this difficult time.

Client Satisfaction Is Priority

function myFunction() { document.getElementById("text").innerHTML = "Facing criminal charges can be overwhelming. It is our job to make the process as clear as possible and lessen the burden on you. Although achieving success is a team effort, we work for you and do not consider the job done until the results bring peace to you and your loved ones."; document.getElementById("btn").style.display = "none"; }

You Are More Than What They Say

function myFunction1() { document.getElementById("text1").innerHTML = "Human beings are much more than what the prosecution may accuse them of. The prosecution sees over 100 criminal defendants in a day. Our clients must stand out among the rest. To do that, our firm creates mitigation packets to give to the prosecutor and the court. Your version of events, our legal analysis, evidence that can support our defense, letters of character, community engagement, and much more is included in this mitigation packet. We have effectively changed the way the prosecution works with clients who come from Grace Legal Group."; document.getElementById("btn1").style.display = "none";}

We Always Go The Extra Mile

function myFunction11() { document.getElementById("text11").innerHTML = "The police are not perfect. So to combat this, our investigative team of former law enforcement examines and reviews every aspect of the case leaning on every ounce of their prior experience. This allows for a thorough analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. Legal Motions are regularly drafted and submitted throughout the process to hold both the police and the prosecutor accountable. The Constitution must be upheld in other courts."; document.getElementById("btn11").style.display = "none"; }

Take Advantage of Our 100% Free Consultation To Secure Redemption

Fill In The Form

By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & acknowledge our Privacy Policy.