In the American legal system, two key figures are at the center: the judge and the prosecutor. The judge wears a black robe and presides over the courtroom. The prosecutor brings charges against defendants. Many think the judge has the most power, but the truth is more complex.
The question of who has more power is important. It affects how justice is served. At Grace Legal Group in Los Angeles, our team sees how this balance impacts our clients’ cases.
What many don’t know is that prosecutors have a lot of control over criminal cases. They decide who gets charged and what plea deals to offer. These decisions often decide a case’s outcome before it reaches the judge. Prosecutors have a lot of freedom and face little oversight.
Knowing how judges and prosecutors work together is key. It matters if you’re facing charges, seeking justice, or just want to understand our legal system. In the next sections, we’ll dive into both roles to answer the question of who has more power in American courtrooms.
The American Justice System: An Overview
The American justice system is complex. It has foundational principles and key players. The system is a network of institutions, rules, and individuals. Each has specific roles to balance authority and protect rights.
The system uses an adversarial model. Prosecutors represent the state, and defense attorneys defend the accused. Experienced attorneys at Grace Legal Group say these dynamics can be uneven in practice. This affects case outcomes and defendant rights.
Separation of Powers in the Courtroom
The principle of separation of powers is key in the courtroom. It ensures no single entity has too much power. Judges are part of the judicial branch, while prosecutors are part of the executive branch.
This setup creates checks and balances. Judges oversee trials and interpret laws. Prosecutors decide which cases to pursue. Defense attorneys protect the accused’s rights. Juries decide guilt based on facts.
This balance prevents power abuse. For example, prosecutors decide charges, but judges decide if those charges are legal. This balance is key to the criminal court’s power dynamics.
The Adversarial System Explained
The American justice system is adversarial. This means prosecutors and defense attorneys present their strongest arguments before a neutral judge or jury. The goal is to find truth through competition.
This is different from inquisitorial systems, where judges investigate. In the US, judges mainly ensure procedures are followed. Prosecutors and defense attorneys present evidence and arguments.
Attorneys at Grace Legal Group in Los Angeles say this system shapes case strategies. It places a lot of importance on rules for gathering, presenting, and challenging evidence.
| Feature | Adversarial System (US) | Inquisitorial System | Impact on Power Balance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judge’s Role | Passive referee | Active investigator | Limits judicial influence over evidence |
| Evidence Gathering | Conducted by opposing parties | Directed by the court | Gives prosecutors significant investigative power |
| Trial Format | Competitive presentation | Collaborative truth-seeking | Creates strategic leverage points |
| Decision Making | Often jury-based | Typically judge-determined | Distributes power beyond legal professionals |
Key Players in Criminal Proceedings
Understanding the roles of judge and prosecutor is key. Each participant in the justice system plays a role in case progression and resolution.
Judges oversee trials, interpret laws, and protect constitutional rights. They make important decisions on evidence, jury instructions, and sentences. They also keep the courtroom in order and resolve disputes.
Prosecutors represent the government. They decide which cases to pursue and what charges to file. Their power can influence case outcomes more than judges in some cases.
Defense attorneys protect the accused’s rights and challenge the government’s case. They play a key role in balancing prosecutorial power. They scrutinize evidence, question witnesses, and ensure due process.
Juries are the ultimate fact-finders in many trials. They decide if the prosecution has proven guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This civilian participation checks judicial and prosecutorial power.
Other important participants include court clerks, bailiffs, probation officers, and witnesses. Each plays a part in the balance of power in criminal proceedings.
Grace Legal Group in Los Angeles stresses the importance of understanding these roles. The power dynamics between participants shape case strategies, negotiation positions, and outcomes for defendants.
Defining the Role of a Judge
Judges play a key role in the American legal system. They ensure justice is fair and consistent. Their job is to balance power and impartiality.
Judicial Responsibilities and Authority
Judges do more than just preside over trials. They interpret laws for specific cases. This is a big part of their judicial authority.
In trials, judges decide what evidence jurors can see. They rule on objections and what evidence meets legal standards. These decisions can change the case’s outcome.
Judges also teach juries about the law. They explain complex legal ideas in simple terms. This helps the jury make fair decisions.
Judges decide sentences for those found guilty. This power varies by place and law. The judge and prosecutor work together here, with the judge making the final call.
Types of Judges in the US Legal System
The US has different types of judges. Federal judges are appointed for life. They work in district courts, appeals courts, and the Supreme Court.
State courts have similar levels, but judges may face elections. This can affect their decisions.
There are also specialized courts for areas like family and mental health. Judges in these courts focus on specific laws. They may use special remedies.
Magistrate judges handle early steps like search warrants. They have less power but are key to the system’s daily work.
Limits of Judicial Power
Judges have a lot of power but face limits. Laws can limit their choices, like in criminal cases. This can shift power to prosecutors.
Appeals courts check judges’ decisions. They can overturn rulings if they’re wrong. Judges must think about this when making decisions.
Laws also limit judges. Legislators can change or override their interpretations. This keeps judges from making laws.
Politics and public opinion also affect judges. Elected judges worry about keeping their jobs. Even appointed judges care about public opinion.
At Grace Legal Group in Los Angeles, lawyers know about these limits. They use this knowledge to help their clients. Their experience shows that understanding these limits is key to winning cases.
Understanding the Prosecutor’s Function
The role of prosecutors in the U.S. legal system is both powerful and often misunderstood. While judges have the final say in court, prosecutors have a lot of power. They decide who gets charged, negotiate plea deals, and manage cases. This balance between prosecutors and judges shapes our justice system.
Prosecutorial Duties and Discretion
Prosecutors are government lawyers who bring criminal cases against those accused of breaking the law. Their main goal is to seek justice, not just win cases.
The key part of a prosecutor’s job is their prosecutorial discretion. This means they decide who gets charged and what charges to file. As Grace Legal Group (818-650-1744) points out, this choice can mean freedom or jail for someone.
Prosecutors also do other important things:
- They look at evidence to see if a case is strong enough to go to court.
- They represent the government in court.
- They work out plea deals with defense lawyers.
- They suggest bail and sentences.
- They work with police to solve crimes.
Police arrest people based on probable cause, but don’t decide on charges. This lets prosecutors check if there’s enough evidence for a case.
Different Types of Prosecutors
The U.S. has many types of prosecutors, each handling different cases. Knowing about these helps us understand how prosecution works in different places.
Federal prosecutors deal with federal crimes. They are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. They handle big crimes like drug trafficking and terrorism.
State prosecutors, or District Attorneys, handle most cases. They are elected by voters and are responsible for crimes like murder and robbery.
Specialized prosecutors focus on specific crimes. They become experts in areas like domestic violence or white-collar crimes. This helps them manage cases better and support victims.
The Scope of Prosecutorial Authority
Prosecutors have a lot of power, more than many people think. This power affects how cases are handled in many ways.
Deciding who gets charged is a big part of a prosecutor’s job. This choice can change a person’s life before they even go to court. As Grace Legal Group (located at 811 Wilshire Blvd Suite 1701, Los Angeles) notes, these decisions often decide what happens next in a case.
Prosecutors also have a big say in:
- Setting bail, which affects if someone stays free before trial.
- What evidence to share with the defense.
- Offering plea deals, which solve most cases without trial.
- What sentences to recommend.
The roles of judge and prosecutor in criminal cases are interesting. While judges make the final decisions, prosecutors really shape cases from the start. This is clear in plea negotiations, where prosecutors can decide the outcome by controlling charges and penalties.
Looking at prosecutor influence vs judicial authority, it’s clear prosecutors’ choices often affect people’s lives more than judges’. This has led to debates about fairness and oversight in the prosecutorial system, affecting those who are marginalized and seeking justice.
Judge vs Prosecutor Power: A Direct Comparison
When we look at who has more power in court, judges and prosecutors have a balance. Their roles are key to the justice system, but they have different powers. This balance changes based on the case, the place, and the people involved.
Knowing who has more power is important for anyone in the criminal justice system. This includes defendants, lawyers, and citizens who care about justice.
Areas Where Judges Hold More Authority
Judges have a lot of control in court. They manage the proceedings, set the pace, and follow rules. They also make important evidentiary rulings that jurors consider.
Judges give jury instructions that guide jurors. They can also hold people in contempt, which can lead to fines or jail. This shows their strong authority.
Judges also decide on sentencing, within legal limits. An attorney at Grace Legal Group says, “Judges can use their discretion to consider factors that can change a defendant’s sentence.”
Domains Where Prosecutors Exercise Greater Control
Prosecutors have a lot of power before cases go to court. They decide what charges to file. This choice can greatly affect the outcome of a case.
Prosecutors also decide on plea deals, which end most cases. They can offer deals that reduce sentences. They also decide on bail, which affects if someone stays free or not.
Prosecutors can also dismiss cases. Judges must agree, but they rarely say no. This gives prosecutors a lot of control over which cases go forward.
Overlapping Spheres of Influence
Sentencing is an area where judges and prosecutors work together. Prosecutors make recommendations that judges often follow. This is true in many places.
Deciding what evidence to allow is another area where they work together. Prosecutors help judges decide what evidence to let in. They also help set the schedule for trials.
The relationship between judges and prosecutors varies. Attorneys at Grace Legal Group say, “Knowing the power dynamic in a courthouse is key for effective legal strategies.”
This relationship creates a balance of power. Judges can reject deals they don’t like. Prosecutors can appeal decisions or change their strategies. Who has more power depends on the case and the place.
Charging Decisions: The Prosecutor’s Domain
The charging phase is key in a criminal case. Prosecutors have a lot of power here. They decide if a case goes forward and what charges are filed. This gives them a big role in the justice system.
Discretion in Filing Charges
Prosecutors have a lot of freedom when deciding to charge someone. They look at the evidence and decide what to do. This discretionary authority goes beyond just following the law.
Many things influence their decisions. These include office policies, available resources, and the strength of evidence. Personal judgment and politics also play a part.
Prosecutors’ decisions are not often reviewed by others. This can lead to unfair treatment in similar cases, as seen by attorneys at Grace Legal Group.
Impact of Charging Decisions on Case Outcomes
The charges filed by prosecutors shape the whole case. They set the stage for everything that follows. These decisions affect bail, sentencing, and more.
Bail is often tied to the severity of the charges. This can mean a defendant might be detained if they can’t pay. This detention can make it hard for them to defend themselves and may lead to plea deals.
The charges also determine the possible sentences. By choosing specific charges, prosecutors set the range of punishment. This gives them a lot of power in negotiations.
| Aspect of Case | How Charging Decisions Impact | Resulting Consequences | Defendant’s Options |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bail/Detention | Higher charges lead to higher bail amounts | Potential pretrial detention | Limited defense preparation |
| Plea Negotiations | Sets the starting point for bargaining | Increased pressure to plead guilty | Accept plea or risk trial |
| Sentencing Range | Determines maximum/minimum penalties | Shapes judge’s sentencing options | Face severe penalties or negotiate |
| Collateral Consequences | Determines immigration, licensing impacts | Long-term effects beyond incarceration | Limited ability to mitigate |
Overcharging as a Strategic Tool
Prosecutors sometimes file more charges than the evidence supports. This is called overcharging. It’s a way to get a better deal in plea negotiations.
There are two types of overcharging:
Vertical overcharging means charging the most serious offense when evidence supports a lesser one. For example, charging assault with intent to kill when simple assault is more fitting.
Horizontal overcharging means filing multiple charges for the same crime. This makes the penalties seem worse than they are.
The goal of overcharging is to get a better plea deal. Defendants often agree to plead guilty to lesser charges to avoid harsh penalties. Grace Legal Group (818-650-1744) notes that this leads to many plea deals.
Critics say overcharging is unfair and gives prosecutors too much power. It can make the justice system seem unfair. Supporters say prosecutors need flexibility to deal with complex crimes and that plea bargaining saves court time.
Prosecutors have a lot of power during the charging phase. Judges have power later, but only after prosecutors have set the stage. Understanding this is key to navigating the justice system.
Courtroom Authority: The Judge’s Realm
The courtroom is where judges have the most power. They control the trial, the evidence, and how things are done. Prosecutors lead at the start, but judges take over once the trial begins. This shows how power changes hands in our legal system.
Control Over Trial Proceedings
Judges have total control over trials from start to finish. This is a big part of judicial power in our courts.
Before the trial, judges decide what to fight over and how to proceed. They make key decisions in these early stages.
When the trial starts, judges have many roles:
- They set the schedule and deadlines.
- They pick the jury and give them instructions.
- They manage how lawyers argue and behave.
- They decide on objections right away.
- They decide when to take breaks and when to start again.
This control makes sure trials are fair and run smoothly. As Grace Legal Group’s lawyers have seen, a judge’s style can greatly affect the case.
Evidentiary Rulings and Their Significance
Judges have a huge role in deciding what evidence jurors can see. These decisions can change the outcome of a case. It’s one of the judge’s most important tools.
- They decide if physical evidence and testimony can be used.
- They rule on expert witnesses’ qualifications and limits.
- They decide if evidence is relevant or could sway the jury unfairly.
- They look at exceptions to hearsay and other technical rules.
These choices affect what the jury hears, which can change the case’s outcome. For example, excluding evidence in a restraining order case can greatly impact the decision.
The power to keep out evidence shows how judge vs prosecutor authority in court is different. Prosecutors choose the charges, but judges decide what evidence supports those charges.
Contempt Powers and Courtroom Management
Judges have special powers to keep the courtroom in order. They can punish anyone who disrupts or disobeys court orders.
The scope of contempt authority includes:
- Issuing fines for bad behavior.
- Ordering brief detentions for disruptions.
- Forcing witnesses to testify by threatening sanctions.
- Removing people who disrupt the courtroom.
- Imposing jail time for serious violations of court orders.
These powers apply to everyone in the courtroom, including prosecutors. A judge can hold a prosecutor in contempt, showing the judge’s ultimate authority.
Judges also manage many aspects of the courtroom. They decide on seating, media access, security, and even what to wear. These details show the judge’s authority in the courtroom.
The judge’s role as manager creates a space where their power is always seen. From the bench to the formal procedures, everything shows the judge’s authority.
While prosecutors have a lot of power outside the courtroom, inside, the judge is in charge. This division of power is a key part of our justice system. It makes sure no one person controls everything.
Sentencing Power: Shared Authority with Distinct Roles
Sentencing decisions show how prosecutors and judges work together in criminal cases. Each plays a key role in deciding a defendant’s fate. Over time, the power balance has changed, affecting justice outcomes.
Prosecutorial Recommendations
Prosecutors have a big say in sentencing through their recommendations. Judges often rely on these, as they handle many cases. This makes prosecutors’ views very important.
The prosecutor’s influence is seen in several ways:
- Sentencing memoranda that outline the government’s position on appropriate punishment
- Strategic presentation of aggravating factors that can increase sentence severity
- Coordination of victim impact statements that may emotionally sway sentencing decisions
- Highlighting or downplaying aspects of the defendant’s criminal history
Prosecutors use their knowledge of the case to make strong arguments for punishment. They focus on keeping the public safe and deterring crime.
Studies show judges often agree with prosecutors’ recommendations. In some places, judges follow them over 70% of the time. This shows how much prosecutors influence sentencing.
Judicial Sentencing Discretion
Judges have the final say in sentencing, within legal limits. They can tailor punishments to fit each case. This is a powerful tool for judges.
- The nature and circumstances of the offense
- The defendant’s criminal history and personal background
- The need for deterrence, rehabilitation, and public protection
- Sentencing guidelines applicable to the case
- Principles of proportionality and fairness
Judges use their discretion to balance different interests. They might give a lighter sentence if it’s better for rehabilitation. Or they might give a harsher sentence if it’s needed for public safety.
But, how much discretion judges have varies a lot. It depends on the state and the type of crime. Some states give judges more freedom, while others limit it.
Mandatory Minimums and Their Effect on Power Dynamics
Mandatory minimum sentencing laws have changed the balance of power in courts. These laws require specific minimum sentences for certain crimes. This shift has given prosecutors more control over sentencing.
With mandatory minimums, the prosecutor’s decision on charges can decide the minimum sentence. Judges have no power to show leniency in these cases.
This change in power has serious effects:
- Prosecutors can use harsh sentences to get guilty pleas
- Judges can’t give lighter sentences, even if they think it’s fair
- Defendants are pressured to cooperate with prosecutors to avoid harsh sentences
- Similar crimes can get very different sentences, based on the prosecutor’s decision
This shift has led to more people in prison and unfair sentencing. It has also made racial and socioeconomic disparities worse. Many experts question if the current power balance serves justice.
The debate over prosecutor influence versus judicial authority is key. Prosecutors need some freedom to represent the public interest. But, the limits on judges’ power raise concerns about fairness in justice.
The push for criminal justice reform focuses on finding the right balance. It’s important to ensure a fair and effective system.
Plea Bargaining: The Intersection of Powers
In the world of criminal justice, plea bargaining shows how judges and prosecutors work together. About 95% of cases end in plea deals, not trials. This shows how big a role plea bargaining plays in our justice system.
Plea bargaining is where prosecutors and judges meet, creating a unique situation. It’s key for defendants to know about this. It also helps keep the justice system fair.
The Prosecutor’s Leverage in Negotiations
Prosecutors have a lot of power in plea talks. They start by deciding which charges to bring. This can put a lot of pressure on defendants.
Prosecutors have several ways to influence negotiations:
- They decide which charges to file or drop
- They suggest sentences to the judge
- They know more about the evidence than defendants do
- They can use mandatory minimum sentences
Prosecutors also use the “trial penalty” to their advantage. This means defendants who go to trial and lose often get harsher sentences. This makes defendants more likely to take plea deals.
The Judge’s Oversight and Approval Role
While prosecutors lead the talks, judges have a big role in checking the process. They make sure defendants understand what they’re agreeing to. This helps balance the power, but it’s not always effective everywhere.
Judges can:
- Accept or reject plea deals
- Ask questions to make sure defendants know what they’re doing
- Make sure there’s a good reason for the plea
- In some cases, suggest different sentences
In some places, judges can also decide who sentences a defendant. This is called an Arbuckle waiver. It shows how judges and prosecutors work together in plea deals.
Even with these checks, judges usually follow what prosecutors suggest. Judges often see plea deals as a way to handle a lot of cases.
Real-world Implications for Defendants
Plea bargaining has big effects on defendants. They often have to make tough choices with little information. The pressure to accept a plea can be huge, even more so for those who can’t afford a lawyer.
Some big problems include:
- Innocent people might plead guilty to avoid harsher sentences
- People often make big decisions without all the facts
- Those who can’t afford to fight may take bad deals
- Plea deals can happen too fast, missing important details
Studies show these issues hit hard on those who are already struggling. It’s a big problem for fair trial rights and justice. People from tough backgrounds might take bad deals because they can’t fight back.
Plea bargaining means prosecutors often decide what happens to defendants. This changes how we see criminal court power dynamics. It shows prosecutors have more power than judges in many cases.
How Power Dynamics Affect Justice Outcomes
Power imbalances between judges and prosecutors change justice outcomes a lot. They affect how people see the criminal justice system. Attorneys at Grace Legal Group in Los Angeles have seen how these power issues impact justice.
Impact on Defendants’ Rights and Fair Trial
The power balance between judges and prosecutors affects defendants’ rights. Prosecutors’ strong influence can make defendants give up theirfair trial rights. This pressure shows in many ways:
Prosecutors control what evidence defendants see. This can limit defendants’ knowledge of their case.
Defendants often choose plea deals to avoid harsh sentences. Legal experts at Grace Legal Group say many never get to trial by jury.
Prosecutors have more resources and preparation for trials. This makes trials unfair for defendants.
Judges can balance this by following rules and staying neutral. But, they must want to challenge prosecutors’ power.
Effects on Marginalized Communities
Power issues between judges and prosecutors hurt marginalized groups a lot. Racial minorities and the poor face big challenges:
A Bureau of Justice Statistics report shows Black males have a 1 in 3 chance of prison. Latino males have a 1 in 6 chance, and white males have a 1 in 17 chance. These numbers show howcriminal court power dynamicsmake social inequalities worse.
Prosecutors decide which cases to pursue and how hard to go after them. They also decide charges, plea offers, and whether to recommend jail or programs.
These decisions can help or hurt racial disparities. If prosecutors think about these issues, they can help fix biases. But if they ignore them, they might make things worse.
Judges also play a big role through sentencing and managing cases. They can help fix disparities if they understand and care about them.
Public Perception of Justice System Fairness
The public’s view of justice is shaped by the power between judges and prosecutors. This view is very important for the system’s trustworthiness.
Many people learn about justice from TV shows that show judges as all-powerful. This makes people think judges control everything. But, this is not true.
Prosecutors really decide most things, but their work is often hidden. This can make people doubt justice when they see unfair outcomes.
When prosecutors and judges act withlegal ethicsand fairness, people trust the system more. Attorneys at Grace Legal Group (818-650-1744) say being open about decisions helps build trust.
Trust is key in areas hit hard by the justice system. Seeing fair treatment and balance makes people believe in justice more.
The relationship between judges and prosecutors affects not just cases but also how society sees justice. When it works right, with checks and balances, it shows justice is fair and seen to be fair.
Checks and Balances Between Judicial and Prosecutorial Authority
In the criminal justice system, a system of checks and balances keeps things balanced. This system stops either side from having too much power. Prosecutors have a lot of freedom in criminal cases, but there are ways to keep their power in check.
How Judges Can Check Prosecutorial Overreach
Judges have tools to stop prosecutors from going too far. When prosecutors act unethically or illegally, judges must step in. This keeps the justice system fair.
Judges can dismiss cases if the evidence is weak or if there’s misconduct. This stops prosecutors from bringing bad cases. It acts as a strong warning to prosecutors.
Judges also control what evidence can be used in court. By keeping out bad evidence, they make sure trials are fair. This is a key part of keeping trials on the right track.
Judges can also reject plea deals if they’re unfair. This stops prosecutors from pushing for deals that aren’t right. It keeps the justice system fair.
In cases ofserious prosecutorial misconduct, judges can punish prosecutors. This can include formal warnings or even dismissing the case. These punishments keep prosecutors honest and stop bad behavior.
But, how well judges can check prosecutors varies. Many decisions are made before court, limiting what judges can do. Also, proving misconduct is hard, making challenges rare.
How Prosecutors Navigate Judicial Constraints
Prosecutors find ways to keep their power despite judges’ checks. They use strategies to work within the rules. This lets them keep their freedom while being watched by judges.
Prosecutors choose which court to take a case to. They pick courts that are likely to rule in their favor. This way, they avoid judges who might disagree with them.
Prosecutors also time their actions carefully. They make key decisions when judges are less likely to interfere. This gives them an edge in court.
Prosecutors pick charges that limit judges’ power. By choosing certain charges, they can control sentencing. This shifts power from judges to prosecutors.
Prosecutors use pre-trial detention to get plea deals. The threat of more jail time often makes defendants agree to plea deals. This gives prosecutors a lot of power, even with judges watching.
These tactics show how prosecutors can keep control, even with judges watching. The secret nature of many decisions makes it hard for judges to check prosecutors. This leads to what some call “prosecutorial dominance.”
The Role of Appeals Courts in Power Balance
Appeals courts are key in balancing power between judges and prosecutors. They set the rules for how both sides must act.
Appeals courts can support or limit judges’ decisions. If they back a judge, it strengthens checks on prosecutors. If they disagree, it gives prosecutors more power.
How appeals courts interpret laws is very important. Their decisions on what prosecutors must disclose and how they must act shape the relationship between prosecutors and judges. These interpretations set the rules for future cases.
Appeals courts also set standards for prosecutorial behavior. Clear rules help prevent misconduct. These rules guide judges in dealing with prosecutors who might overstep their bounds.
Appeals court decisions have a big impact. One ruling can change the balance of power for thousands of cases. This makes appeals courts very important in the ongoing battle for authority.
But, appeals have big limits. They are expensive, take a long time, and are hard to win. This means many prosecutorial actions go unchecked. This creates gaps in the system of checks and balances.
The complex relationship between trial courts, prosecutors, and appeals courts shows that checks and balances work differently in practice. It takes a lot of legal knowledge and strategy to navigate these power dynamics. Experienced defense attorneys must have these skills to protect their clients.
Conclusion: The Delicate Balance of Power in Criminal Justice
The American criminal justice system is complex. Judges and prosecutors have different roles. Judges have formal power, while prosecutors have a big say through their decisions.
This balance has changed over time. Now, prosecutors have more power because of mandatory minimum sentences. Their choices can decide what happens to someone in court.
People facing charges feel the impact of this power. Those with less money can be pushed hard by prosecutors. Even judges try to be fair, but it’s tough.
The system works because of checks and balances. Judges can say no to unfair deals. Prosecutors must follow the law as judges see it. This balance is key to protecting everyone’s rights.
Knowing how power works in the justice system is important. At Grace Legal Group in Los Angeles, lawyers understand this. They help clients by knowing how judges and prosecutors work together.
It’s hard to say who has more power, judges or prosecutors. Both are important for justice and protecting rights. The strength of our system comes from their working together.